The Tecno Spark 4 and Motorola Moto E6 Plus represent the lower end of the smartphone market, targeting first-time buyers or those seeking a reliable secondary device. While both aim for affordability, they take different approaches to achieving it, particularly in their core processing power. This comparison dissects those differences to determine which phone delivers the best experience for the price.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Motorola Moto E6 Plus offers a more balanced experience. Its Mediatek Helio P22 chipset, with its octa-core configuration, provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Tecno Spark 4’s quad-core processor, translating to smoother multitasking and app loading. While the Spark 4 may offer a slightly lower price point, the E6 Plus’s efficiency and responsiveness make it the better overall choice.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, September 25. Released 2019, September 25 | 2019, September 05. Released 2019, September 16 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 165.3 x 75.9 x 8.2 mm (6.51 x 2.99 x 0.32 in) | 155.6 x 73.1 x 8.6 mm (6.13 x 2.88 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Micro-SIM |
| Weight | - | 149.7 g (5.29 oz) |
| | - | Water-repellent coating |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~282 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 91.3 cm2 (~80.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 2.0 GHz | Octa-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | - | Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 (12 nm) |
| GPU | - | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), HIOS 5.5 | Android 9.0 (Pie) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 13 MP, f/2.0, 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | Dual LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 13 MP, AF
Auxiliary lenses | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0, 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 4000 mAh | Li-Po 3000 mAh, removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Royal Purple, Vacation Blue | Polished Graphite, Bright Cherry, Dark Red |
| Models | KC8 | PAGA0004, PAGA0004IN, PAGA0033IN, PAGA0033 |
| Price | - | About 200 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.28 W/kg (head) 1.25 W/kg (body) |
Tecno Spark 4
- Potentially lower price point
- Simple and straightforward user experience
- May include features like face unlock
- Quad-core processor limits performance
- Likely shorter battery life
- Potentially slower app loading times
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
- Octa-core processor for smoother performance
- Larger 4000mAh battery for extended use
- More efficient 12nm chipset
- May be slightly more expensive
- Basic camera system
- 10W charging is relatively slow
Display Comparison
Neither device is expected to boast a high-end display. Given the price bracket, both likely utilize LCD panels with 720p+ resolutions. The lack of detailed display specifications necessitates a focus on the processing power's impact on UI smoothness. A faster processor, like the Moto E6 Plus’s Helio P22, will contribute more to a fluid visual experience than a marginal difference in display quality at this price point.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is difficult. However, it’s reasonable to assume both phones feature basic camera setups geared towards casual photography. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is likely more of a marketing feature than a substantial improvement in image quality. The image signal processor (ISP) within the Helio P22 chipset of the Moto E6 Plus may offer slightly better image processing capabilities, potentially resulting in more detailed and vibrant photos, but this is speculative without further data.
Performance
The core difference lies in the CPU configuration. The Tecno Spark 4 features a quad-core 2.0 GHz processor, while the Motorola Moto E6 Plus utilizes a Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 with an octa-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 setup. The Helio P22, built on a more efficient 12nm process, offers a significant advantage in multi-threaded tasks. While both CPUs are clocked at the same speed, the eight cores of the Helio P22 allow for parallel processing, resulting in faster app launches and smoother multitasking. This is particularly beneficial for users running multiple apps simultaneously or engaging in light gaming.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for the Tecno Spark 4, but the Moto E6 Plus benefits from a large 4000mAh battery. Coupled with the 12nm efficiency of the Helio P22 chipset, the E6 Plus is likely to offer significantly longer battery life than the Spark 4. The Moto E6 Plus also supports 10W wired charging, which, while not fast, is a standard offering in this price range. The Spark 4’s charging speed is unknown, but it’s unlikely to exceed the E6 Plus’s 10W capability.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Spark 4 if your primary need is absolute minimal cost and you primarily use your phone for basic tasks like calls, texts, and light social media. It's a viable option for those on a severely restricted budget. Buy the Motorola Moto E6 Plus if you value a more responsive user experience, smoother multitasking, and slightly better long-term performance. The E6 Plus is ideal for users who want a phone that can handle a wider range of apps and tasks without significant lag.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Motorola Moto E6 Plus struggle with popular apps like Facebook or WhatsApp?
While the Helio P22 isn't a powerhouse, it's capable of running apps like Facebook and WhatsApp smoothly. The octa-core configuration provides enough processing power for these everyday applications, and the 4000mAh battery ensures you won't run out of power quickly while using them.
❓ Is the Tecno Spark 4 a good option for someone who primarily uses their phone for calls and texts?
Yes, the Tecno Spark 4 is a suitable option for basic communication. Its quad-core processor is sufficient for making calls, sending texts, and using simple apps. However, if you anticipate using your phone for anything beyond these basic tasks, the Moto E6 Plus offers a more responsive and enjoyable experience.
❓ Can either of these phones handle light gaming?
Light gaming is possible on both devices, but the Motorola Moto E6 Plus will provide a noticeably smoother experience. The Helio P22’s GPU is more capable than what’s typically paired with a quad-core processor, allowing for playable frame rates in less demanding games. Expect to lower graphics settings for optimal performance.
