The Tecno Spark 20P and Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The Spark 20P aims for affordability, while the Poco X5 Pro prioritizes performance with a more powerful chipset and faster charging. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device delivers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 778G 5G chipset provides a significantly smoother experience, especially for gaming and demanding applications, and the 67W charging is a game-changer. While the Tecno Spark 20P offers a lower price, the performance trade-offs are substantial.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, June 13 | 2023, February 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, June | Available. Released 2023, February 07 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 75.6 x 8.6 mm (6.44 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) | 162.9 x 76 x 7.9 mm (6.41 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~267 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 900 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | - | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 256GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, (wide), 1/2.8", PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.2 (Intl), 5.1 (India), A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band - India |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 45 min
5W reverse wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Alpenglow Gold, Magic Skin | Astral Black, Horizon Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | - | 22101320G, 22101320I |
| Price | About 240 EUR | € 156.00 / $ 221.33 / ₹ 22,490 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 113h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-24.9 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 531398 (v9)
GeekBench: 2930 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Tecno Spark 20P
- More affordable price point
- Decent battery endurance (113h)
- Functional for basic smartphone tasks
- Significantly weaker processor
- Slow 18W charging
- Likely lower display quality
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
- Powerful Snapdragon 778G 5G chipset
- Ultra-fast 67W charging with PD3.0/QC4
- Brighter and potentially smoother display
- Higher price tag
- May be overkill for basic users
- No reverse wireless charging
Display Comparison
The Poco X5 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 912 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Tecno Spark 20P. This higher peak brightness translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both are likely LCD panels given the price points, the Poco’s brightness advantage is a clear win. Contrast ratio is listed as infinite (nominal) for the Poco, suggesting a well-tuned panel, though this is a common marketing term. The absence of refresh rate data for the Tecno Spark 20P suggests it likely operates at the standard 60Hz, while the Poco X5 Pro is expected to offer a smoother 120Hz experience, enhancing scrolling and animations.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but details are limited. Without sensor size or aperture information for either phone, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Poco X5 Pro’s more powerful image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 778G will likely result in better image processing, particularly in low-light conditions. The Tecno Spark 20P likely relies on software enhancements to compensate for a less capable camera system. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the Poco X5 Pro, if equipped, would further enhance image quality and video stabilization.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco X5 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Tecno Spark 20P’s Mediatek processor. The Snapdragon 778G features a prime Cortex-A78 core clocked at 2.4 GHz, alongside three additional Cortex-A78 cores at 2.2 GHz, and four efficiency cores at 1.9 GHz. This contrasts with the Spark 20P’s octa-core 2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 configuration, which represents an older and less efficient architecture. The 6nm manufacturing process of the Snapdragon further contributes to better power efficiency and sustained performance. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more enjoyable gaming experience on the Poco X5 Pro.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 113 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life despite the Tecno Spark 20P’s unspecified battery capacity. However, the charging experience is drastically different. The Poco X5 Pro’s 67W wired charging, supporting PD3.0 and QC4, can fully charge the device in just 45 minutes. The Tecno Spark 20P’s 18W charging is significantly slower. Furthermore, the Poco X5 Pro offers 5W reverse wired charging, allowing it to top up other devices, a feature absent on the Spark 20P. The faster charging speed of the Poco X5 Pro is a major convenience factor.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Spark 20P if you need a functional smartphone for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use, and your budget is extremely limited. You'll accept compromises in performance and charging speed. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro if you prioritize a responsive user experience, enjoy mobile gaming, and value fast charging – it’s a worthwhile investment for those seeking a more capable device.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 778G in the Poco X5 Pro get hot during extended gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 778G is a relatively efficient chipset. While it will generate heat during prolonged gaming, the 6nm process and likely thermal management solutions within the Poco X5 Pro should prevent significant throttling. Expect some warmth, but not to the point of severely impacting performance.
❓ Is the 18W charging on the Tecno Spark 20P slow enough to be a major inconvenience?
Yes, 18W charging is considerably slower than the 67W charging on the Poco X5 Pro. A full charge will take significantly longer, potentially requiring overnight charging. This is a major drawback for users who need a quick power boost.
❓ What type of storage does the Poco X5 Pro use, and does it impact performance?
The Poco X5 Pro utilizes UFS 2.2 storage, which is a fast storage standard. This contributes to quicker app loading times and smoother overall performance compared to slower eMMC storage found in some budget phones.
❓ Does the Tecno Spark 20P support 5G connectivity?
The context data does not explicitly state 5G support for the Tecno Spark 20P. Given its positioning as a budget device, it's possible it only supports 4G LTE. The Poco X5 Pro, with its Snapdragon 778G 5G, definitively supports 5G connectivity.
