The sub-$200 smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Tecno Spark 20P and Motorola Moto G84 represent compelling options for users prioritizing 5G connectivity without breaking the bank. This comparison dives deep into their specifications, focusing on real-world performance implications to determine which device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Motorola Moto G84 is the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 695 chipset offers a more efficient architecture, translating to better sustained performance and a significantly longer battery life (12:31h active use) compared to the Tecno Spark 20P. While the Spark 20P is cheaper, the G84’s usability advantage justifies the price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - LATAM |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 66 - LATAM |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 26, 28, 40, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - LATAM |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, June 13 | 2023, August 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, June | Available. Released 2023, September 08 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back or eco leather back |
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 75.6 x 8.6 mm (6.44 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) | 160 x 74.4 x 7.6 mm (6.30 x 2.93 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 166.8 g (5.86 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~267 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | P-OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | - | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 4GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.9 (wide), 1/1.5", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, (wide), 1/2.8", PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | - |
| Single | 8 MP | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio (market/region dependent) |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 30W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Alpenglow Gold, Magic Skin | Marshmallow Blue, Midnight Blue, Viva Magenta |
| Models | - | XT2347, XT2347-1, XT2347-2 |
| Price | About 240 EUR | $ 399.00 / £ 189.99 / € 169.00 |
Tecno Spark 20P
- Lower price point makes it highly accessible.
- 5G connectivity offers future-proofed data speeds.
- Suitable for basic smartphone tasks.
- Older chipset architecture limits performance.
- Likely inferior battery life compared to the Moto G84.
- Display brightness and quality are likely lower.
Motorola Moto G84
- Superior performance thanks to the Snapdragon 695.
- Excellent battery life (12:31h active use).
- Brighter display (996 nits) for better outdoor visibility.
- Higher price compared to the Tecno Spark 20P.
- May still lack features found in higher-end smartphones.
- Software update support may be limited.
Display Comparison
The Motorola Moto G84 boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 996 nits. This is crucial for outdoor visibility, a clear advantage over the Tecno Spark 20P, whose peak brightness is not specified but is likely lower given its market positioning. While both likely utilize IPS LCD panels, the G84’s higher brightness and potentially better color calibration contribute to a superior viewing experience. The absence of refresh rate information for the Spark 20P suggests a standard 60Hz panel, while the G84 is expected to have a 120Hz panel, offering smoother scrolling and animations.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are lacking for the Tecno Spark 20P. The Motorola Moto G84 likely features a more refined camera system, benefiting from Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP). Without sensor size or aperture information for the Spark 20P, it’s difficult to assess its low-light performance. The G84’s camera is expected to deliver more consistent results across various lighting conditions. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the G84, if present, would further enhance image and video quality.
Performance
The chipset is where the most significant difference lies. The Motorola Moto G84’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (6nm) utilizes a more modern architecture – Kryo 660 Gold & Silver cores – compared to the Tecno Spark 20P’s Mediatek chipset and its Cortex-A53 cores. The 6nm process node of the Snapdragon 695 also contributes to improved power efficiency. While both CPUs feature octa-core configurations with a 2.2 GHz peak clock speed, the Snapdragon’s core design and manufacturing process provide a noticeable performance edge in demanding applications and multitasking. The Spark 20P’s older architecture will likely struggle with heavier workloads.
Battery Life
The Motorola Moto G84 excels in battery performance, achieving an impressive 12:31h of active use and an endurance rating of 117 hours. This is a substantial improvement over what we’d expect from the Tecno Spark 20P, given its 18W charging and unspecified battery capacity. The G84’s 30W wired charging also allows for faster top-ups, reducing downtime. The Snapdragon 695’s power efficiency plays a key role in the G84’s extended battery life, making it ideal for users who rely heavily on their smartphones throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Spark 20P if your primary need is absolute affordability and you primarily engage in light tasks like calling, texting, and basic social media. Buy the Motorola Moto G84 if you prioritize all-day battery life, smoother multitasking, and a brighter, more usable display, even if it means spending a bit more upfront.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Mediatek chipset in the Tecno Spark 20P struggle with graphically demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
Yes, the older Cortex-A53 cores and less powerful GPU in the Tecno Spark 20P will likely result in lower frame rates and potential stuttering in demanding games like PUBG Mobile, even at lower settings. The Motorola Moto G84’s Snapdragon 695 is better equipped to handle such games.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge the Motorola Moto G84 with the 30W charger?
While a precise 0-100% charging time isn't available, the Motorola Moto G84’s 30W charging should fully charge the battery in approximately 1 hour and 30 minutes to 2 hours, depending on usage during charging. This is significantly faster than the Tecno Spark 20P’s 18W charging.
❓ Does the Motorola Moto G84 support VoLTE and VoWiFi for improved call quality?
The Motorola Moto G84 is highly likely to support VoLTE (Voice over LTE) and VoWiFi (Voice over Wi-Fi), given Motorola’s typical implementation in its smartphones. These technologies provide clearer call quality and faster connection times. The Tecno Spark 20P’s support for these features is less certain and would depend on regional carrier compatibility.
