The Tecno Spark 20 Pro+ and Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. The Spark 20 Pro+ focuses on maximizing battery life and offering solid performance at an aggressive price point, while the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ prioritizes charging speed and a significantly brighter display alongside a more powerful chipset. This comparison will dissect their key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a vibrant display and rapid charging, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is the clear winner. Its 120W charging and significantly brighter screen outweigh the Tecno Spark 20 Pro+'s longer battery life in active use. However, budget-conscious users will find the Tecno a compelling alternative.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA- International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, December 29 | 2023, September 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, February 09 | Available. Released 2023, September 21 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 164.7 x 75 x 7.6 mm (6.48 x 2.95 x 0.30 in) | 161.4 x 74.2 x 8.9 mm (6.35 x 2.92 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 199 g or 204.5 g (7.02 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2436 pixels (~393 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 109.9 cm2 (~89.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1000 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 Ultimate | Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G610 MC4 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 200 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", 0.7µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 19 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Temporal Orbits, Lunar Frost, Radiant Starstream, Magic Skin 2.0 Green | Midnight Black (Fushion Black), Moonlight White (Fushion White), Aurora Purple, Fushion Purple, Camo Green |
| Models | KJ7 | 23090RA98C, 23090RA98G, 23090RA98I |
| Price | - | $ 299.98 / £ 299.00 / € 208.98 / ₹ 24,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.85 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.98 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
Tecno Spark 20 Pro+
- Exceptional battery life (11:56h active use)
- Aggressive price point
- Solid performance for everyday tasks
- Slower charging speed (33W)
- Dimmer display (549 nits)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+
- Ultra-fast 120W charging (0-100% in 19 min)
- Significantly brighter display (1283 nits)
- More powerful chipset (Dimensity 7200 Ultra)
- Shorter battery life (10:38h active use)
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ boasts a significantly brighter display, peaking at 1283 nits, compared to the Tecno Spark 20 Pro+'s 549 nits. This difference is immediately noticeable in outdoor visibility, making the Redmi far more usable in direct sunlight. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels (though not explicitly stated), the Redmi’s higher peak brightness and potential for wider color gamut coverage provide a superior viewing experience. The lack of information on refresh rates or panel technology (LTPO) for either device leaves a gap, but the brightness difference is a decisive factor.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications beyond the main sensors, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Redmi Note 13 Pro+’s chipset benefits from a more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor), potentially leading to better image processing and low-light performance. The absence of OIS information for either device is a concern, but the Redmi’s more advanced chipset suggests a greater capacity for computational photography techniques to compensate. We can assume both phones will feature a range of lenses, but the Redmi’s processing power will likely be the deciding factor in image quality.
Performance
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ leverages the Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Ultra, a 4nm chipset with Cortex-A715 cores clocked at 2.8 GHz. This represents a substantial upgrade over the Tecno Spark 20 Pro+'s Mediatek Helio G99 Ultimate, which uses Cortex-A76 cores at 2.2 GHz and is built on a less efficient process. The Dimensity 7200 Ultra’s more modern architecture and smaller node translate to improved performance and thermal efficiency, meaning sustained performance during demanding tasks like gaming. While both phones feature octa-core CPUs, the Redmi’s chipset will deliver a smoother and more responsive experience.
Battery Life
The Tecno Spark 20 Pro+ achieves an impressive 11:56h of active use, outperforming the Redmi Note 13 Pro+'s 10:38h. However, this advantage is offset by the Redmi’s blazing-fast 120W charging, capable of fully charging the device in just 19 minutes. The Tecno’s 33W charging is considerably slower. This trade-off is crucial: the Tecno offers longer runtimes between charges, while the Redmi minimizes downtime with its incredibly rapid charging capabilities. The Redmi also supports PD3.0, adding to its charging versatility.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Spark 20 Pro+ if you need exceptional battery endurance and prioritize value over raw processing power. It’s ideal for users who frequently travel or rely heavily on their phone throughout the day without easy access to charging. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ if you prefer a stunningly bright display, incredibly fast charging, and a more responsive user experience, even if it means slightly less battery life.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Ultra in the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ get hot during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 7200 Ultra is built on a 4nm process, which inherently offers better thermal efficiency compared to the Helio G99 Ultimate's larger node. While some heat generation is inevitable during intensive gaming, the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is expected to manage temperatures more effectively, minimizing throttling and maintaining consistent performance for longer periods.
❓ Is the 33W charging on the Tecno Spark 20 Pro+ slow enough to be a significant inconvenience?
While 33W charging isn't slow by any means, it pales in comparison to the Redmi Note 13 Pro+'s 120W charging. Expect a full charge to take considerably longer on the Tecno – likely over an hour. If you frequently find yourself needing to top up quickly, the slower charging speed could be a drawback.
❓ How does the Helio G99 Ultimate handle multitasking compared to the Dimensity 7200 Ultra?
The Dimensity 7200 Ultra’s Cortex-A715 cores and more efficient architecture provide a noticeable advantage in multitasking. The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ will handle more apps running in the background and switch between them more smoothly than the Tecno Spark 20 Pro+.
