The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Tecno Spark 20 Pro+ and Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro represent compelling options for budget-conscious buyers. While both aim to deliver a premium experience without the flagship price tag, they take distinctly different approaches – the Tecno prioritizing all-day battery life and affordability, while the Poco focuses on raw processing power and a brighter display.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing gaming and demanding applications, the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset offers a substantial performance leap over the Tecno’s Helio G99 Ultimate. However, the Tecno Spark 20 Pro+ remains a strong contender for users who value battery endurance and a lower upfront cost.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, December 29 | 2024, January 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, February 09 | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 164.7 x 75 x 7.6 mm (6.48 x 2.95 x 0.30 in) | 160.5 x 74.3 x 8.3 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 186 g or 190 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2436 pixels (~393 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 109.9 cm2 (~89.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1000 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 Ultimate | Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali G615-MC6 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", 0.7µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 67W wired, QC2.0, PD3.0, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Temporal Orbits, Lunar Frost, Radiant Starstream, Magic Skin 2.0 Green | Black, Yellow, Gray |
| Models | KJ7 | 2311DRK48G, 2311DRK48I |
| Price | - | € 195.30 / $ 209.79 / £ 274.99 / ₹ 21,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
Tecno Spark 20 Pro+
- Excellent battery life (11:56h active use)
- More affordable price point
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- Significantly weaker processor than the Poco X6 Pro
- Dimmer display, less suitable for outdoor use
- Slower charging speed (33W)
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro
- Powerful Dimensity 8300 Ultra processor
- Much brighter display (1148 nits)
- Fast 67W charging with QC/PD support
- Slightly shorter battery life than the Tecno
- Potentially higher price
- More powerful processor may generate more heat
Display Comparison
The Poco X6 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1148 nits compared to the Tecno Spark 20 Pro+'s 549 nits. This difference is immediately noticeable outdoors, where the Poco remains easily readable in direct sunlight. While both likely utilize IPS LCD panels (based on market segment), the higher brightness of the Poco suggests a more advanced backlight system. The Tecno’s lower brightness may be sufficient for indoor use, but users who frequently consume content outdoors will greatly benefit from the Poco’s superior visibility. We lack data on refresh rates or PWM dimming, but the brightness difference is the dominant factor here.
Camera Comparison
Context data only mentions 'Photo / Video' for the Poco X6 Pro, leaving a detailed camera analysis incomplete. However, given Xiaomi’s history, we can expect a more sophisticated camera system with features like OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) and potentially larger sensor sizes. The Tecno Spark 20 Pro+’s camera specifications are unknown, but it’s likely to focus on providing acceptable image quality for social media sharing. Without further details, it’s safe to assume the Poco X6 Pro offers a more versatile and capable camera experience, particularly in low-light conditions. We'll disregard any mention of 2MP macro lenses on either device as they offer minimal practical benefit.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is substantial. The Poco X6 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4nm) is a powerhouse, featuring an octa-core configuration with a high-clocked Cortex-A715 prime core at 3.35 GHz. This contrasts sharply with the Tecno Spark 20 Pro+'s Helio G99 Ultimate, which utilizes a more modest octa-core setup with Cortex-A76 cores peaking at 2.2 GHz. The 4nm process node of the Dimensity 8300 Ultra also contributes to better thermal efficiency, meaning less performance throttling during sustained workloads like gaming. The Poco will deliver a far smoother experience in graphically intensive games and demanding applications.
Battery Life
Despite the Poco X6 Pro’s more powerful processor, the battery life is remarkably close. Both phones achieve around 11:46-11:56 hours of active use. This suggests efficient power management on both sides. However, the Poco X6 Pro’s 67W wired charging with support for QC2.0 and PD3.0 is a significant advantage, allowing a full charge in just 45 minutes. The Tecno Spark 20 Pro+ is limited to 33W charging, resulting in a considerably slower charging time. This faster charging capability makes the Poco more convenient for users who need to quickly top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Spark 20 Pro+ if you need a phone that reliably lasts a full day on a single charge and prioritize value for money. It’s ideal for everyday tasks, social media, and casual gaming. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro if you prefer a smoother experience with demanding games, video editing, or multitasking, and are willing to trade a bit of battery life for significantly increased performance and a much brighter screen.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 8300 Ultra in the Poco X6 Pro get noticeably hot during extended gaming sessions?
While the 4nm process helps with thermal efficiency, the Dimensity 8300 Ultra is a powerful chip. Expect some heat buildup during prolonged gaming, but the Poco X6 Pro likely incorporates thermal management solutions to prevent significant throttling. Performance will likely remain consistent for longer than the Tecno Spark 20 Pro+ under similar load.
❓ Is the 33W charging on the Tecno Spark 20 Pro+ slow enough to be a major inconvenience?
33W charging is slower than the Poco X6 Pro’s 67W, taking considerably longer to reach a full charge. If you frequently need to quickly top up your battery, this could be a drawback. However, the Tecno’s excellent battery life mitigates this issue somewhat, as you may not need to charge as often.
❓ Does the Poco X6 Pro support high refresh rate gaming, and what frame rates can I expect in popular titles like PUBG Mobile?
While the context data doesn't specify the display's refresh rate, the Dimensity 8300 Ultra is capable of driving high refresh rate panels. Expect smooth gameplay at 60fps in most titles, and potentially 90fps or higher in PUBG Mobile with optimized settings, depending on the display's capabilities.
