The Tecno Spark 20 Pro+ and Motorola Edge 40 Neo represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. The Spark 20 Pro+ focuses on maximizing battery life and offering a feature-rich experience at a lower price point, while the Edge 40 Neo prioritizes a brighter display, faster charging, and a more refined chipset. This comparison dives deep into the specifics to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and value, the Tecno Spark 20 Pro+ emerges as the winner. Its impressive 11:56h active use score and lower price outweigh the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s brighter screen and faster charging, unless those features are paramount.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, December 29 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, February 09 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.7 x 75 x 7.6 mm (6.48 x 2.95 x 0.30 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2436 pixels (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 109.9 cm2 (~89.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1000 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 Ultimate | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", 0.7µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Temporal Orbits, Lunar Frost, Radiant Starstream, Magic Skin 2.0 Green | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | KJ7 | XT2307-1 |
| Price | - | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
Tecno Spark 20 Pro+
- Exceptional battery life (11:56h active use)
- More affordable price point
- Solid performance for everyday tasks
- Less powerful chipset compared to the Edge 40 Neo
- Significantly dimmer display
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility (1073 nits)
- Faster 68W charging (50% in 15 min)
- More powerful Dimensity 7030 chipset
- Shorter battery life (10:28h active use)
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1073 nits compared to the Tecno Spark 20 Pro+'s 549 nits. This difference is crucial for users frequently exposed to direct sunlight, where the Edge 40 Neo will remain easily readable. While both utilize LCD technology (assumed based on market segment), the higher peak brightness of the Motorola gives it a clear advantage in outdoor visibility. Color accuracy and panel type (IPS vs. VA) are not specified, but the brightness difference is the dominant factor here.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera analysis is limited by the provided data. Both phones are described as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but sensor details are absent. The absence of any mention of a high-resolution sensor on the Tecno suggests it doesn't rely on megapixel count as a primary selling point. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo likely benefits from MediaTek’s image signal processor (ISP) enhancements within the Dimensity 7030, potentially leading to better image processing and low-light performance. Without further information, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the chipset advantage leans towards the Motorola.
Performance
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6nm) offers a performance edge over the Tecno Spark 20 Pro+'s Helio G99 Ultimate. The Dimensity 7030 features Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.5 GHz, a step up from the G99’s Cortex-A76 cores at 2.2 GHz. This translates to snappier app launches, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming performance. The 6nm process node of the Dimensity 7030 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads. While both phones feature 6x Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz, the architectural advantage of the Dimensity 7030 is substantial.
Battery Life
The Tecno Spark 20 Pro+ delivers superior battery life, achieving 11:56h of active use compared to the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s 10:28h. While the Edge 40 Neo’s older endurance rating of 80h suggests good overall efficiency, the real-world active use test favors the Tecno. However, the Motorola compensates with significantly faster 68W wired charging, capable of reaching 50% charge in just 15 minutes, while the Tecno is limited to 33W. This charging speed difference is a major convenience factor for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Spark 20 Pro+ if you need exceptional battery endurance for extended use, prioritize value for money, and are comfortable with a slightly less powerful processor. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prefer a significantly brighter display for outdoor visibility, demand faster 68W charging, and value the performance boost offered by the Dimensity 7030 chipset for smoother multitasking and gaming.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the MediaTek Dimensity 7030 in the Motorola Edge 40 Neo get noticeably hot during extended gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 7030's 6nm process node is designed for improved thermal efficiency compared to older chipsets. While some heat generation is inevitable during demanding tasks like gaming, it's less likely to experience significant throttling than the Tecno Spark 20 Pro+ due to the more efficient manufacturing process and improved architecture.
❓ How much faster is the 68W charging on the Motorola Edge 40 Neo compared to the 33W charging on the Tecno Spark 20 Pro+ in real-world use?
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo's 68W charging can deliver a 50% charge in just 15 minutes, while the Tecno Spark 20 Pro+'s 33W charging will take considerably longer – likely around 45-60 minutes for a similar charge level. This makes the Motorola a better choice for users who need a quick power boost.
❓ Is the difference in display brightness between the two phones noticeable in everyday use, or only in direct sunlight?
The 524-nit difference in peak brightness is quite significant and noticeable even in moderately bright indoor environments. While the difference is most pronounced in direct sunlight, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo's display will generally appear more vibrant and easier to read in most lighting conditions.
