The Tecno Spark 20 Pro represents a new wave of aggressively priced smartphones, while the Oppo Reno 10x Zoom, though older, was a flagship known for its camera and performance. This comparison examines whether the newer chipset and faster charging of the Tecno can overcome the Reno’s legacy hardware and refined experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user in 2024, the Tecno Spark 20 Pro offers a better value proposition. While the Oppo Reno 10x Zoom boasts a more powerful (though older) Snapdragon 855, the Spark 20 Pro’s efficient Helio G99, coupled with its faster 33W charging, provides a more modern and practical experience for everyday use and light gaming.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE |
| | - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, December 15 | 2019, April. Released 2019, June |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, December | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 168.6 x 76.6 x 8.4 mm (6.64 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) | 162 x 77.2 x 9.3 mm (6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~396 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~387 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 108.6 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, ColorOS 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/3.0, 130mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF OIS, 5x optical zoom, 10x hybrid zoom
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide) |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS; video rec. only with main camera |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, EDR, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 20W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4065 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Moonlit Black, Frosty Ivory, Sunset Blush, Magic Skin 2.0 Green | Ocean Green, Jet Black, Mist Pink, Ocean Blue |
| Models | KJ6 | CPH1919, PCCM00 |
| Price | About 50 EUR | About 1020 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 107h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-24.7 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 364220 (v7), 407473 (v8)
GeekBench: 10395 (v4.4), 2103 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 35fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Tecno Spark 20 Pro
- Faster 33W charging for quicker top-ups
- More efficient 6nm Helio G99 chipset
- Likely more modern software features
- Potentially less raw processing power than the Snapdragon 855
- Camera specs are unknown, potentially limiting image quality
Oppo Reno 10x zoom
- Powerful Snapdragon 855 processor (for its time)
- Potentially superior zoom capabilities (based on name)
- Established brand reputation
- Slower 20W charging
- Older chipset with potentially higher power consumption
- Likely outdated software and security patches
Display Comparison
The Oppo Reno 10x Zoom’s display is reported at 440 nits of peak brightness, a respectable figure for its time, but likely overshadowed by modern panels. The Tecno Spark 20 Pro’s display specifications are not provided, but given its price point, it likely falls in a similar brightness range. Both displays feature an 'infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, typical of OLED/AMOLED panels. The Reno’s age means it lacks features like high refresh rates common in the Spark 20 Pro’s segment, potentially resulting in a less fluid scrolling experience.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed camera specs are absent. The Reno 10x Zoom’s name suggests a focus on zoom capabilities, likely utilizing a periscope lens. However, without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to assess image quality. The Tecno Spark 20 Pro, being a newer device, may benefit from improved image processing algorithms, even with a potentially less sophisticated camera system. The absence of details necessitates caution; relying on megapixel counts alone would be misleading.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Reno 10x Zoom utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (7nm), featuring a Kryo 485 CPU configuration with a prime core clocked at 2.84 GHz. This was a flagship processor in its day, offering substantial performance. However, the Tecno Spark 20 Pro’s MediaTek Helio G99 (6nm) is built on a more efficient node. While the Snapdragon 855 has a higher peak clock speed, the G99’s architecture and 6nm process offer better power efficiency, potentially leading to longer sustained performance and less thermal throttling. The G99’s Cortex-A76 cores, while not as powerful as the Kryo 485, are still capable for everyday tasks and moderate gaming.
Battery Life
Both the Tecno Spark 20 Pro and Oppo Reno 10x Zoom share an endurance rating of 107 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life despite differing battery capacities (not specified). However, the charging speeds differ significantly. The Tecno Spark 20 Pro supports 33W wired charging, allowing for a much faster 0-100% charge compared to the Oppo Reno 10x Zoom’s 20W charging. This faster charging is a significant advantage for users who prioritize convenience and minimal downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Spark 20 Pro if you prioritize a modern chipset for efficient multitasking and gaming on a budget, and value faster charging speeds. Buy the Oppo Reno 10x Zoom if you can find it at a significantly discounted price and prioritize a potentially smoother experience in demanding applications, accepting the slower charging and older software.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Helio G99 in the Tecno Spark 20 Pro struggle with demanding games like Genshin Impact?
While the Helio G99 isn't a flagship gaming chip, it's capable of running Genshin Impact at medium settings with reasonable frame rates. Expect some frame drops during intense scenes, but it's playable. The 6nm process helps mitigate thermal throttling, allowing for sustained performance.
❓ Is the Oppo Reno 10x Zoom still receiving software updates in 2024?
It's highly unlikely that the Oppo Reno 10x Zoom is receiving regular software updates in 2024. Being an older device, it has likely reached its end-of-life support from Oppo, potentially leaving it vulnerable to security risks.
❓ How does the charging speed difference impact daily use between the two phones?
The 33W charging on the Tecno Spark 20 Pro allows for a full charge in approximately 70-90 minutes, while the Oppo Reno 10x Zoom’s 20W charging will take over 2 hours. This means you can quickly top up the Tecno during short breaks, making it more convenient for users on the go.
