The Tecno Spark 10 and Oppo A57s represent compelling options in the ultra-competitive budget smartphone market. Both devices leverage MediaTek’s Helio series chipsets, but subtle differences in processing power and, crucially, charging technology, dictate which phone is the better fit for different users. This comparison dives deep into the specs to reveal the true strengths of each device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo A57s emerges as the slightly better choice. While the Tecno Spark 10 offers a comparable processor, the Oppo A57s’ significantly faster 33W charging – capable of a full charge in just 69 minutes – provides a tangible benefit in daily usability, outweighing the minor CPU clock speed difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, March 23 | 2022, August 31 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, April | Available. Released 2022, September 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Panda Glass), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 75.4 x 8.4 mm (6.45 x 2.97 x 0.33 in) | 163.8 x 75 x 8 mm (6.45 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 187 g (6.60 oz) |
| | - | IP5X (dust), IPX4 (water) resistance |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Panda Glass |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~267 ppi density) | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~84.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio G37 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 13, HIOS 12 | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF
0.08 MP, (depth) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | Panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 33W wired, 100% in 69 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, White, Skin Orange | Starry Black, Sky Blue |
| Models | KI5q | CPH2385 |
| Price | € 151.38 / ₹ 9,899 | - |
Tecno Spark 10
- Potentially slightly lower price point.
- Comparable processor performance for basic tasks.
- Likely similar battery life (assuming comparable capacity).
- Slower 18W charging.
- No standout features.
- Display likely average for the price.
Oppo A57s
- Significantly faster 33W charging (69 minutes to 100%).
- Slightly higher CPU clock speed on Cortex-A53 cores.
- Convenience of quicker top-ups.
- May be slightly more expensive.
- Similar camera performance to the Tecno Spark 10.
- Display likely average for the price.
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both utilize standard LCD panels, and detailed specifications like resolution and refresh rate are absent from the provided data. This suggests a focus on cost-cutting in this area. Bezels are likely comparable, typical of this price segment. Color accuracy is also likely similar, leaning towards the acceptable but not exceptional for casual viewing.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely to be similar on both devices, given the lack of detailed sensor information. The market segment suggests both will feature a primary camera paired with auxiliary lenses of limited utility (likely a 2MP macro and depth sensor). Image processing will likely prioritize social media-friendly results over accuracy. Without knowing sensor sizes or apertures, it’s difficult to assess low-light performance, but expectations should be tempered.
Performance
Both the Tecno Spark 10 and Oppo A57s are powered by MediaTek Helio G37 and G35 chipsets respectively, both fabricated on a 12nm process. The Tecno Spark 10’s Helio G37 has a slightly higher CPU clock speed (2.3 GHz vs 2.3 GHz, but with 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 cores compared to 1.8 GHz on the A57s). This translates to a marginal performance advantage in CPU-intensive tasks, but the difference will likely be imperceptible in everyday use. The GPU performance is also likely similar, making both phones suitable for light gaming. The lack of information on RAM type (LPDDR4X is probable) and speed limits a deeper analysis of multitasking capabilities.
Battery Life
The battery capacity is not specified for either device, but both likely feature batteries in the 5000mAh range, typical for this price point. However, the Oppo A57s’ 33W wired charging is a significant advantage over the Tecno Spark 10’s 18W charging. The Oppo A57s can achieve a 100% charge in just 69 minutes, while the Tecno Spark 10 will require considerably longer, making the Oppo a more convenient option for users who need to quickly replenish their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Spark 10 if you prioritize a slightly lower initial cost and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. It’s a solid all-rounder for basic smartphone tasks. Buy the Oppo A57s if you value convenience and faster charging; the 33W charging is a significant advantage for users who frequently find themselves needing to top up their battery quickly, and the slightly higher CPU clock speed offers a marginal performance boost.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ How much faster is the 33W charging on the Oppo A57s compared to the 18W charging on the Tecno Spark 10 in real-world use?
The 33W charging on the Oppo A57s will significantly reduce charging times. While a precise comparison requires testing, the Oppo A57s can reach 100% in 69 minutes. The Tecno Spark 10, with its 18W charging, will likely take well over 2 hours to fully charge, making the Oppo a much more convenient option for users who need a quick power boost.
❓ Will I notice a performance difference between the Helio G37 in the Tecno Spark 10 and the Helio G35 in the Oppo A57s while playing games like PUBG Mobile?
The performance difference between the Helio G37 and G35 is minimal. Both chipsets are capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium settings, but don't expect a flagship gaming experience. The slight CPU clock speed advantage of the G37 might result in marginally smoother performance, but it's unlikely to be noticeable during gameplay.
❓ Are both phones likely to receive regular software updates and security patches?
Software update support is often inconsistent in the budget segment. Tecno and Oppo have both improved their software support in recent years, but neither can guarantee long-term updates. Check the manufacturers' websites for specific update policies before making a decision.
