The Tecno Pova and Samsung Galaxy A24 4G represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone market. The Pova aims for a gaming-focused experience, while the A24 prioritizes a vibrant display and Samsung’s established software ecosystem. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device delivers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a bright, color-accurate display and a polished software experience, the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G is the better choice. However, gamers and those needing slightly more raw processing power for demanding apps will find the Tecno Pova a more suitable option, despite its less refined display.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, October 03. Released 2020, October 16 | 2023, April 19 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2023, May 05 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 171.2 x 77.6 x 9.4 mm (6.74 x 3.06 x 0.37 in) | 162.1 x 77.6 x 8.3 mm (6.38 x 3.06 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1640 pixels (~263 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~396 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~82.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 103.7 cm2 (~82.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 480 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 10, HIOS 7.0 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 13 MP or 16 MP, f/1.9, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lenses | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS
5 MP, f/2.2, 17mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0 | 13 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Magic Blue, Speed Purple, Dazzle Black | Black, Lime Green, Blue gradient, Dark red |
| Models | LD7, LD7j, MZ-TECNO LD7 | SM-A245F, SM-A245F/DS, SM-A245F/DSN, SM-A245M, SM-A245M/DS, SM-A245N |
| Price | About 110 EUR | About 150 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 0.41 W/kg (head) 1.30 W/kg (body) |
Tecno Pova
- Potentially better gaming performance due to Helio G80
- More affordable price point (likely)
- May offer larger storage options
- Less efficient 12nm chipset
- Dimmer display with lower brightness
- Slower charging speed (18W)
Samsung Galaxy A24 4G
- Brighter and more vibrant display (1012 nits)
- More efficient 6nm Helio G99 chipset
- Faster 25W charging
- Samsung’s One UI software experience
- Potentially higher price
- Gaming performance slightly behind the Pova
- Camera performance may be inconsistent in low light
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A24 4G immediately stands out with its significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 1012 nits. This is a substantial advantage over the Tecno Pova, which lacks published brightness data but is expected to be considerably dimmer given its chipset and market positioning. The A24’s higher brightness translates to better outdoor visibility. While both likely utilize LCD panels, the A24’s superior brightness and color calibration make it the clear winner for multimedia consumption and general usability. The Pova’s display, while functional, will likely appear washed out in direct sunlight.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera analysis is hampered by a lack of specific sensor information for both devices. However, the market positioning suggests the A24 will likely offer a more refined camera experience. Samsung’s image processing algorithms are generally well-regarded, and the A24 benefits from a more sophisticated software suite. The Pova, while potentially offering a higher megapixel count, will likely rely on less advanced image processing. The presence of a 2MP macro lens on both devices is largely a marketing gimmick, offering limited practical benefit due to the small sensor size and lack of optical image stabilization (OIS).
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy A24 4G’s Mediatek Helio G99, fabricated on a 6nm process, offers a clear architectural advantage over the Tecno Pova’s Helio G80 (12nm). The G99’s Cortex-A76 cores, clocked at 2.2 GHz, provide a noticeable performance uplift compared to the Pova’s 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming performance. The 6nm process also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during extended gaming sessions. While both phones feature octa-core CPUs, the G99’s more modern architecture and efficient fabrication process give it a distinct edge.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A24 4G boasts an endurance rating of 141 hours, indicating strong battery life. While the Tecno Pova’s battery capacity is not specified, its 18W charging is slower than the A24’s 25W charging. This means the A24 will likely reach a full charge faster, minimizing downtime. The A24’s efficient Helio G99 chipset also contributes to better power management, potentially offsetting any capacity difference between the two devices. The faster charging speed of the A24 is a significant convenience factor for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Pova if you need a phone primarily for mobile gaming, frequently run demanding applications, and prioritize raw processing power over display quality. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G if you prefer a vibrant, bright display for media consumption, value Samsung’s One UI software, and prioritize a more refined overall user experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Mediatek Helio G99 in the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G get hot during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Helio G99’s 6nm process is more efficient than the Tecno Pova’s Helio G80, resulting in lower heat generation. While some throttling is inevitable during extended gaming, the A24 is less likely to experience significant performance drops due to overheating compared to the Pova.
❓ Is the 2MP macro camera on either phone worth using?
Generally, no. The 2MP macro cameras on both the Tecno Pova and Samsung Galaxy A24 4G suffer from limited detail and poor low-light performance due to their small sensor size. They are primarily a marketing feature and offer minimal practical benefit over using the main camera in close-up mode.
❓ Can the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile at high settings?
The A24 4G can run PUBG Mobile, but achieving consistently high frame rates at maximum settings may be challenging. Expect to play at medium settings for a smoother experience. The Helio G99 is capable, but it's not a flagship-level chipset.
❓ How long does it take to fully charge the Tecno Pova with the 18W charger?
Given the 18W charging speed, a full charge from 0% to 100% on the Tecno Pova is estimated to take around 2.5 to 3.5 hours, depending on battery capacity. This is significantly slower than the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G’s 25W charging.
