The Tecno Pova Slim and Oppo A58 4G represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone market. While both aim to deliver essential features at an accessible price point, they diverge significantly in their core hardware. The Pova Slim boasts a newer, more efficient Mediatek Dimensity 6400 chipset, while the A58 4G relies on the established Helio G85. This comparison will dissect these differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing performance and faster charging, the Tecno Pova Slim emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 6400 chipset offers a noticeable performance uplift over the Helio G85 in the Oppo A58 4G, and its 45W charging significantly reduces downtime. However, the A58 4G remains a viable option for those seeking a reliable, everyday phone with decent battery life.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 900 / 1800 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, September 02 | 2023, July 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, October 08 | Available. Released 2023, July 28 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), fiber-reinforced plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 75.9 x 6 mm (6.46 x 2.99 x 0.24 in) | 165.7 x 76 x 8 mm (6.52 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 156 g (5.50 oz) | 192 g (6.77 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | - |
| Resolution | 1224 x 2720 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~440 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~86.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 144Hz, 1600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 550 nits (typ), 680 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6400 (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6769 Helio G85 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 15, HIOS 15 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, ColorOS 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, (wide), PDAF
2 MP | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 100% in 57 min
10W reverse wired
Bypass charging | 33W wired, 56% in 30 min |
| Type | 5160 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Sky Blue, Slim White, Cool Black | Glowing Black, Dazzling Green |
| Models | KM9 | CPH2577 |
| Price | ₹ 20,999 | About 150 EUR |
Tecno Pova Slim
- Faster charging with 45W support
- More powerful Dimensity 6400 chipset
- Potentially better thermal management due to 6nm process
- Camera performance is less documented
- Build quality may not match the Oppo A58 4G
Oppo A58 4G
- Potentially more refined software experience (based on Oppo’s history)
- Generally considered better build quality
- Reliable performance for basic tasks
- Older and less efficient Helio G85 chipset
- Slower 33W charging
- Less capable for demanding games and multitasking
Display Comparison
Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the price bracket, both likely feature LCD panels with 60Hz refresh rates. The A58 4G’s build quality is generally considered more premium, potentially offering slightly better viewing angles and color reproduction. Without specific data, it’s reasonable to assume both displays prioritize functionality over high-end features like HDR support or high peak brightness.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a precise comparison is difficult. However, both phones likely feature a primary camera paired with depth and macro sensors. The A58 4G’s image processing is known for its vibrant, sometimes oversaturated, color profiles, appealing to users who prefer punchy images. The Pova Slim’s camera performance is less documented, but the newer chipset may offer improved image signal processing capabilities. The presence or absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) would be a critical differentiator, but this information is unavailable.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Tecno Pova Slim’s Mediatek Dimensity 6400, built on a 6nm process, offers a significant architectural advantage over the Oppo A58 4G’s 12nm Helio G85. The Dimensity 6400’s Cortex-A76 cores, clocked at 2.5 GHz, are substantially more powerful than the A58’s 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming performance. The 6nm node also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads. While both are octa-core CPUs, the Dimensity 6400’s architecture provides a clear performance edge.
Battery Life
The Oppo A58 4G supports 33W wired charging, reaching 56% charge in 30 minutes. The Tecno Pova Slim, however, boasts 45W charging, achieving a full charge in just 57 minutes. While the A58 4G’s charging speed is respectable, the Pova Slim’s faster charging is a significant advantage for users who frequently need to top up their battery. The actual battery capacity of both devices is not provided, but the faster charging of the Pova Slim mitigates any potential disadvantage from a smaller battery size.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Pova Slim if you need a phone capable of handling moderate gaming and multitasking with relative ease, and if minimizing charging time is a priority. Its more modern chipset and faster charging are key advantages. Buy the Oppo A58 4G if you prefer a consistently stable experience for basic tasks like calling, messaging, and social media, and if you value a potentially more refined software experience (based on Oppo’s historical software support).
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 6400 in the Tecno Pova Slim handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The Mediatek Dimensity 6400 is a significant step up from the Helio G85. While it won't deliver flagship-level gaming performance, it should comfortably handle PUBG Mobile at medium settings with stable frame rates. The 6nm process also helps mitigate thermal throttling, allowing for longer gaming sessions.
❓ Does the Tecno Pova Slim support reverse wired charging, and is it useful?
Yes, the Tecno Pova Slim supports 10W reverse wired charging. This allows you to use the phone as a power bank to charge other devices, such as wireless earbuds or smartwatches. While 10W is relatively slow, it can be a lifesaver in emergencies when you need to top up a small device on the go.
❓ How does the charging speed of the Oppo A58 4G compare to real-world usage?
The Oppo A58 4G’s 33W charging reaches 56% in 30 minutes. In practical terms, this means you can get a substantial boost in battery life during a quick coffee break. However, a full charge will still take considerably longer, around 1 hour and 45 minutes to 2 hours, depending on usage.
