The smartphone market is brimming with options, making it tough to choose. Today, we're pitting two popular contenders against each other: the budget-friendly Tecno Pova Neo 5G and the well-regarded Samsung Galaxy A54. Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison to see which device reigns supreme.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A54 emerges as the overall winner, offering a superior display, camera, and software experience. While the Tecno Pova Neo 5G provides decent performance at a lower price, the A54's refinement and longevity make it the better investment for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, September 23 | 2023, March 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, September 26 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 170.8 x 77.9 x 9.5 mm (6.72 x 3.07 x 0.37 in) | 158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2 mm (6.23 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | Splash resistant | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 500 nits | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| OS | Android 12, HIOS 8.6 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 8 MP | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.X", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1440p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR | - |
| Single | 8 MP | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1440p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Sprint Blue, Sapphire Black | Lime, Graphite, Violet, White |
| Models | LE6j | SM-A546V, SM-A546U, SM-A546U1, SM-A546B, SM-A546B/DS, SM-A546E, SM-A546E/DS, SM-A5460, SM-A546M, SM-A546M/DS, SM-A546W |
| Price | About 190 EUR | € 210.00 / $ 119.11 / £ 169.95 / ₹ 28,999 |
| SAR | - | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.69 W/kg (head) 1.34 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.6 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 506678 (v9)
GeekBench: 2703 (v5.1), 2797 (v6)
GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Tecno Pova Neo 5G
- Superior Display
- Excellent Camera
- Long-Term Software Support
- Strong Performance
- Great Battery Life
- Slower Charging (25W)
- Higher Price
Samsung Galaxy A54
- Affordable Price
- 5G Connectivity
- Decent Performance for the Price
- Large Battery
- Less Bright Display
- Inferior Camera
- Less Refined Software
- Slower Charging (18W)
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A54 boasts a significantly brighter display (980 nits peak) with an 'infinite' contrast ratio, offering richer colors and deeper blacks. The Tecno Pova Neo 5G's display is adequate but lacks the vibrancy and outdoor visibility of the A54. The A54's Super AMOLED technology provides a noticeable advantage.
Camera Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A54's camera system is a clear winner. It offers superior image quality, better low-light performance, and more versatile shooting options. While the Tecno Pova Neo 5G's camera is functional, it doesn't match the A54's detail and dynamic range. The A54 also likely has better video recording capabilities.
Performance
The Exynos 1380 in the Galaxy A54, built on a 5nm process, generally outperforms the Dimensity 810 (6nm) in the Tecno Pova Neo 5G in sustained tasks. While the Pova Neo 5G handles everyday tasks well, the A54 offers smoother multitasking and better performance in demanding games. Both have octa-core CPUs, but the A54's Cortex-A78 cores provide a performance edge.
Battery Life
Both phones offer excellent battery life, with the Galaxy A54 demonstrating exceptional endurance (119h endurance rating). The Tecno Pova Neo 5G also provides solid battery performance. However, the A54's optimized power management and larger battery capacity give it a slight edge.
Buying Guide
The Tecno Pova Neo 5G is ideal for budget-conscious users prioritizing 5G connectivity and gaming on a tight budget. The Samsung Galaxy A54 is perfect for those seeking a reliable, well-rounded phone with a great camera, vibrant display, and long-term software support.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
While both can handle gaming, the Samsung Galaxy A54's more powerful chipset provides a smoother and more consistent gaming experience, especially for demanding titles.
❓ How long will Samsung provide software updates for the Galaxy A54?
Samsung typically provides 4 years of major Android updates and 5 years of security patches for its A-series phones, ensuring long-term software support for the Galaxy A54.
