The smartphone market is brimming with options, and choosing the right one can be overwhelming. Today, we're pitting two compelling contenders against each other: the budget-friendly Tecno Pova Neo 5G and the established Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G. Let's dive into a detailed comparison to see which phone reigns supreme.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G offers a more refined experience with a superior display, camera, and overall build quality. While the Tecno Pova Neo 5G provides impressive value for its price, the A52s 5G's performance and features justify its slightly higher cost for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, September 23 | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, September 26 | Available. Released 2021, September 01 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 170.8 x 77.9 x 9.5 mm (6.72 x 3.07 x 0.37 in) | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| | Splash resistant | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 500 nits | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 12, HIOS 8.6 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 8 MP | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1440p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1440p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual Proximity Sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | 6000 mAh | Li-Ion 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Sprint Blue, Sapphire Black | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Purple, Awesome Mint |
| Models | LE6j | SM-A528B, SM-A528B/DS, SM-A528N |
| Price | About 190 EUR | £ 112.98 / € 249.47 |
| SAR | - | 0.72 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.88 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 113h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-27.5 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 429675 (v8), 506432(v9)
GeekBench: 11060 (v4.4), 2801 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Tecno Pova Neo 5G
- Superior Display
- Better Performance (Snapdragon 778G)
- Excellent Camera
- Reliable Brand
- Faster Charging (25W)
- Higher Price
- Potentially Larger Size/Weight
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
- Affordable Price
- Long Battery Life
- Decent Gaming Performance
- 5G Connectivity
- Less Bright Display
- Mediocre Camera
- Slower Charging (18W)
- Less Refined Software
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G boasts a significantly brighter display (800 nits) with a near-infinite contrast ratio, offering richer colors and better visibility in sunlight. The Tecno Pova Neo 5G's display is adequate but lacks the same level of vibrancy and brightness. The A52s 5G also likely has better color accuracy.
Camera Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G consistently delivers superior camera performance. It captures more detailed photos and videos with better dynamic range and color accuracy. The Tecno Pova Neo 5G's camera is decent for its price range, but it struggles in low-light conditions and lacks the advanced features of the A52s 5G.
Performance
While both phones feature octa-core processors, the Snapdragon 778G 5G in the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G provides noticeably better performance than the MediaTek Dimensity 810. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the A52s 5G. The Dimensity 810 is still capable, but the Snapdragon holds an edge.
Battery Life
Both phones offer excellent battery life, with the Galaxy A52s 5G achieving an impressive endurance rating of 113 hours. The Tecno Pova Neo 5G likely has a larger battery capacity, but the A52s 5G's efficiency allows it to match or exceed its longevity. The A52s 5G also supports 25W charging, slightly faster than the Tecno's 18W.
Buying Guide
The Tecno Pova Neo 5G is ideal for budget-conscious users who prioritize gaming and long battery life. The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G is a better choice for those seeking a well-rounded smartphone with a great camera, vibrant display, and reliable performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Tecno Pova Neo 5G good for gaming?
Yes, the Tecno Pova Neo 5G is decent for casual gaming, but the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G offers a smoother and more enjoyable gaming experience due to its more powerful processor.
❓ Which phone has better software support?
Samsung generally provides longer software update support than Tecno, so the Galaxy A52s 5G is likely to receive updates for a longer period.
