The smartphone market is segmented, and these two devices exemplify that. The Tecno Pova Neo 3 aims to deliver a solid gaming experience at an ultra-affordable price point, while the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro steps up with a more powerful chipset and premium features, targeting users who demand more from their device without breaking the bank.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset offers a substantial leap in processing power and efficiency compared to the Tecno Pova Neo 3’s Helio G85. However, the Pova Neo 3 remains a viable option for budget-conscious gamers.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, June 29 | 2024, January 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, July | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 170.7 x 77.6 x 9.3 mm (6.72 x 3.06 x 0.37 in) | 160.5 x 74.3 x 8.3 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 186 g or 190 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1640 pixels (~263 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.82 inches, 110.5 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali G615-MC6 |
| OS | Android 13, HIOS | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 67W wired, QC2.0, PD3.0, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | 7000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Amber Gold, Mecha Black, Hurricane Blue | Black, Yellow, Gray |
| Models | LH6n | 2311DRK48G, 2311DRK48I |
| Price | - | € 195.30 / $ 209.79 / £ 274.99 / ₹ 21,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
Tecno Pova Neo 3
- Ultra-affordable price point
- Decent gaming performance for the price
- Potentially large battery capacity (unconfirmed)
- Outdated and less efficient Helio G85 chipset
- Slow 18W charging
- Likely inferior display quality
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro
- Powerful Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset
- Fast 67W charging with QC2.0/PD3.0
- Bright and high-quality display (1148 nits)
- Higher price compared to the Tecno Pova Neo 3
- Camera details are limited in provided data
- May not be the absolute best value for extremely budget-constrained users
Display Comparison
The Poco X6 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1148 nits, which translates to excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Tecno Pova Neo 3’s display specifications are not provided, it’s likely to be considerably dimmer. The X6 Pro’s higher brightness is a major advantage for outdoor use and HDR content consumption. We can assume the X6 Pro uses a higher quality panel given its price point, potentially with better color accuracy and viewing angles.
Camera Comparison
The context data only mentions 'Photo / Video' for the Poco X6 Pro, lacking specific sensor details. However, given its positioning, we can expect a more sophisticated camera system than the Tecno Pova Neo 3, likely featuring a larger main sensor and potentially optical image stabilization (OIS). The Pova Neo 3’s camera capabilities are likely focused on providing acceptable results in good lighting conditions, while the X6 Pro aims for better low-light performance and more detailed images. The absence of details on the Pova Neo 3 suggests a more basic camera setup.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco X6 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4nm) is a powerhouse, featuring an octa-core configuration with a 3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 prime core and three 3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 cores, alongside four 2.20 GHz Cortex-A510 cores. This architecture, built on a 4nm process, delivers significantly higher performance and improved power efficiency compared to the Tecno Pova Neo 3’s Mediatek Helio G85 (12nm). The G85, with its 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, is adequate for casual gaming and everyday tasks, but will struggle with demanding titles and multitasking. The X6 Pro’s superior GPU will also provide a smoother gaming experience at higher settings.
Battery Life
The Poco X6 Pro demonstrates impressive battery life, achieving 11:46h in active use. While the Tecno Pova Neo 3’s battery capacity isn’t specified, its Helio G85 chipset is less power-efficient. The X6 Pro’s 67W wired charging, supporting QC2.0 and PD3.0, allows for a full charge in just 45 minutes, a significant advantage over the Pova Neo 3’s 18W charging. This faster charging is crucial for users who need to quickly top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Pova Neo 3 if you need a dedicated gaming phone on a strict budget, prioritizing long play sessions over graphical fidelity and demanding tasks. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro if you prefer a versatile device capable of handling demanding games, multitasking, and content creation with ease, and value fast charging and a brighter display.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Poco X6 Pro’s Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset get hot during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 8300 Ultra is built on a 4nm process, which offers excellent thermal efficiency. While some heat generation is inevitable during intense gaming, the X6 Pro is expected to manage temperatures effectively, minimizing throttling and maintaining consistent performance. Reviews suggest it handles demanding games well without overheating issues.
❓ Is the 18W charging on the Tecno Pova Neo 3 slow enough to be a major inconvenience?
Yes, 18W charging is considerably slower than the 67W charging on the Poco X6 Pro. It will take significantly longer to fully charge the Pova Neo 3, potentially requiring overnight charging for a full top-up. This is a trade-off for the lower price point.
❓ What kind of gaming performance can I expect from the Tecno Pova Neo 3?
The Helio G85 in the Pova Neo 3 is capable of running most popular mobile games at medium settings. However, demanding titles may require lower graphics settings to maintain a smooth frame rate. It's best suited for casual gamers and those who prioritize battery life over maximum graphical fidelity.
❓ Does the Poco X6 Pro support high refresh rate gaming?
While the context data doesn't explicitly state the display refresh rate, the Poco X6 Pro is expected to support a high refresh rate (likely 120Hz) for smoother gaming and overall user experience. This, combined with the Dimensity 8300 Ultra, will deliver a fluid and responsive gaming experience.
