Tecno continues to deliver impressive budget smartphones, and the Pova Neo 2 and Spark 10 Pro are prime examples. Both offer compelling features at affordable prices, but which one reigns supreme? This comprehensive comparison will help you decide which phone best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Tecno Spark 10 Pro edges out the Pova Neo 2 thanks to its slightly better chipset (Helio G88 vs G85), potentially improved camera performance, and a brighter display. Both offer excellent battery life, making them strong contenders in the budget segment.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, September 26 | 2023, March 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, October 03 | Available. Released 2023, March 22 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 170.9 x 77.8 x 9.6 mm (6.73 x 3.06 x 0.38 in) | 168.4 x 76.2 x 8.4 mm (6.63 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 208 g (7.34 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1640 pixels (~263 ppi density) | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~396 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.82 inches, 110.5 cm2 (~83.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 109.3 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6769H Helio G88 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 12, HIOS 8.6 | Android 13, HIOS 12.6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 16 MP, (wide), AF
Secondary unknown camera | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), PDAF
0.08 MP, (depth) |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), PDAF
other unspecified cameras |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | Dual-LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP | 32 MP, (wide) |
| Video | Yes | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (LG6n only) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | 7000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Uranolite Gray, Virtual Blue, Orange Magma | Starry Black, Pearl White |
| Models | LG6n | KI7 |
| Price | About 240 EUR | £ 245.74 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 131h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1991:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-29.2 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 249938 (v9)
GeekBench: 1358 (v5.1), 1376 (v6)
GFXBench: 8.1fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Tecno Pova Neo 2
- Large Display
- Excellent Battery Life
- Affordable Price
- Decent Gaming Performance
- Slightly Weaker Chipset
- Lower Display Brightness
- Potentially Inferior Camera
Tecno Spark 10 Pro
- Brighter Display
- Slightly Better Performance
- Potentially Better Camera
- Modern Design
- Slightly Higher Price
- Battery life is identical to Pova Neo 2
Display Comparison
Both phones feature large displays with a nominal contrast ratio of 1991:1. However, the Spark 10 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 521 nits, significantly brighter than the Pova Neo 2, offering better visibility in sunlight. The Spark 10 Pro's display also likely has better color accuracy.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited in the provided specs, but the Helio G88 in the Spark 10 Pro generally supports more advanced camera features and image processing capabilities. While both likely offer decent image quality for the price, the Spark 10 Pro is expected to deliver slightly better photos and videos, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. Both likely have a primary camera around 50MP.
Performance
While both phones share the same CPU core configuration, the Tecno Spark 10 Pro utilizes the slightly more powerful Mediatek Helio G88 chipset compared to the Pova Neo 2's Helio G85. This translates to marginally better overall performance, especially in demanding tasks and gaming. Expect smoother multitasking and slightly faster app loading times on the Spark 10 Pro.
Battery Life
Both phones boast an impressive endurance rating of 131 hours, indicating exceptional battery life. Users can expect all-day battery performance with moderate usage on either device. Charging speed is identical at 18W wired.
Buying Guide
The Tecno Pova Neo 2 is ideal for users prioritizing gaming and a large display on a tight budget. The Tecno Spark 10 Pro is a better choice for those who value a slightly more powerful processor, a brighter screen, and potentially better camera quality, even if the price is a bit higher.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Tecno Spark 10 Pro worth the extra money?
If you prioritize a brighter display, slightly better performance, and potentially improved camera quality, then the Spark 10 Pro is worth the extra investment. However, if you're on a very tight budget and primarily need a phone for basic tasks and gaming, the Pova Neo 2 remains a solid choice.
❓ What is the battery life like on these phones?
Both the Tecno Pova Neo 2 and Spark 10 Pro offer exceptional battery life, with an endurance rating of 131 hours. You can realistically expect all-day battery performance with moderate usage.
