The Tecno Pova series is known for delivering impressive features at budget-friendly prices. But with multiple models available, choosing the right one can be tricky. This article dives deep into a head-to-head comparison of the Tecno Pova Neo 2 and the Tecno Pova 4 Pro, helping you decide which phone best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Tecno Pova 4 Pro is the clear winner, offering a significantly faster chipset (Helio G99 vs G85), faster charging (45W vs 18W), and a more efficient 6nm process. While the Neo 2 is a decent budget option, the Pro's upgrades make it a worthwhile investment if your budget allows.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, September 26 | 2022, October 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, October 03 | Available. Released 2022, October 10 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 170.9 x 77.8 x 9.6 mm (6.73 x 3.06 x 0.38 in) | 164.8 x 77 x 9.2 mm (6.49 x 3.03 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1640 pixels (~263 ppi density) | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.82 inches, 110.5 cm2 (~83.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.66 inches, 105.3 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | AMOLED, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 12, HIOS 8.6 | Android 12, HIOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 16 MP, (wide), AF
Secondary unknown camera | 50 MP, (wide), PDAF
0.08 MP, (depth) |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP | 50 MP, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (LG6n only) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Yes |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 45W wired |
| Type | 7000 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Uranolite Gray, Virtual Blue, Orange Magma | Fluorite Blue |
| Models | LG6n | LG8n |
| Price | About 240 EUR | - |
Tecno Pova Neo 2
- Large 6000mAh battery
- Affordable price
- Large display
- Decent performance for basic tasks
- Slower chipset
- Slow charging (18W)
- Less powerful camera
- Older 12nm process
Tecno Pova 4 Pro
- Faster Helio G99 chipset
- Fast charging (45W)
- More efficient 6nm process
- Likely better camera performance
- Potentially higher refresh rate display
- Higher price
- Battery life might be slightly reduced due to faster charging (though still excellent)
Display Comparison
Both phones feature large 6.67-inch displays, likely with a similar resolution (likely FHD+). However, the Pova 4 Pro might have a slightly improved refresh rate (potentially 120Hz vs 60Hz on the Neo 2), leading to smoother scrolling and animations. We'll need to confirm the exact panel technology and refresh rate for a definitive comparison.
Camera Comparison
While both phones likely feature a multi-camera setup (likely a 50MP main sensor), the Pova 4 Pro's image processing capabilities are likely superior due to its more powerful chipset. Expect better low-light performance, more accurate colors, and improved dynamic range on the Pova 4 Pro. Details on specific camera configurations (ultrawide, macro, depth) are needed for a more precise comparison.
Performance
This is where the Pova 4 Pro shines. The Helio G99 chipset, built on a 6nm process, offers a substantial performance boost over the Neo 2's Helio G85 (12nm). Expect noticeably faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance on the Pova 4 Pro. The Cortex-A76 cores in the G99 are also more powerful than the Cortex-A75 cores in the G85.
Battery Life
Both phones boast large 6000mAh batteries, promising excellent battery life. However, the Pova 4 Pro's 45W fast charging significantly reduces charging times compared to the Neo 2's 18W charging. Expect the Pova 4 Pro to charge much faster.
Buying Guide
The Tecno Pova Neo 2 is ideal for users on a tight budget who prioritize a large screen and long battery life for basic tasks like browsing and social media. The Tecno Pova 4 Pro is better suited for gamers, power users, and anyone who values faster performance, quicker charging, and a more modern chipset.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Tecno Pova 4 Pro worth the extra money?
Yes, if performance and fast charging are important to you. The Helio G99 and 45W charging make a noticeable difference.
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
Both have excellent battery life due to their 6000mAh batteries. However, the Pova 4 Pro's faster charging means you'll spend less time plugged in.
