The Tecno Pova series is known for offering impressive features at budget-friendly prices. The Pova Neo 2 and Pova 3 are two contenders in this space, each boasting unique strengths. Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide which one is right for you.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Tecno Pova 3 edges out the Neo 2 thanks to its significantly faster 33W charging and reverse charging capability. While both offer similar performance, the Pova 3's charging speed and added functionality make it the better overall value for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, September 26 | 2022, May 25 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, October 03 | Available. Released 2022, May 25 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 170.9 x 77.8 x 9.6 mm (6.73 x 3.06 x 0.38 in) | 173.1 x 78.5 x 9.4 mm (6.81 x 3.09 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 230 g (8.11 oz) |
| | - | RGB notification light stripe on the back (Electric Blue model only) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1640 pixels (~263 ppi density) | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~389 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.82 inches, 110.5 cm2 (~83.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.9 inches, 113.1 cm2 (~83.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6769H Helio G88 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 12, HIOS 8.6 | Android 11, HIOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 16 MP, (wide), AF
Secondary unknown camera | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Quad-LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 8 MP | 50 MP, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lenses |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, (wide), PDAF
0.08 MP, (depth)
0.08 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | Dual-LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0 |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (LG6n only) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Yes |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 33W wired
10W reverse wired |
| Type | 7000 mAh | 7000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Uranolite Gray, Virtual Blue, Orange Magma | Electric Blue, Tech Silver, Eco Black |
| Models | LG6n | LF7n |
| Price | About 240 EUR | About 150 EUR |
Tecno Pova Neo 2
- More affordable
- Large display
- Good battery life
- Slower charging
- Less powerful chipset
- Potentially lower camera quality
Tecno Pova 3
- Faster 33W charging
- Reverse wired charging
- Slightly better performance
- Improved camera system
- Slightly more expensive
- Similar battery capacity (but faster charging offsets this)
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature a large 6.8-inch display, probably with an LCD panel and a resolution around 1080 x 2400 pixels. Expect similar viewing experiences, though the Pova 3 might have slightly better color accuracy or brightness due to potential panel upgrades. Refresh rate is likely 90Hz or 120Hz on both.
Camera Comparison
The Pova 3 is expected to have a more versatile camera system. While both likely feature a 16MP front camera, the Pova 3 probably has a higher resolution main rear camera (likely 48MP vs. the Neo 2's 13MP) and potentially additional lenses like a macro or depth sensor. Image quality should be noticeably better on the Pova 3, especially in low light.
Performance
The Pova 3's Helio G88 chipset offers a modest performance advantage over the Neo 2's Helio G85. While both are capable of handling everyday tasks and some gaming, the G88 provides smoother multitasking and slightly better graphics performance. Expect both to handle casual games well, but demanding titles might require lower settings.
Battery Life
Both phones pack a large 6000mAh battery, promising excellent battery life. However, the Pova 3's 33W fast charging significantly reduces charging times compared to the Neo 2's 18W charging. The Pova 3 also offers reverse wired charging, allowing it to charge other devices.
Buying Guide
The Tecno Pova Neo 2 is a good choice for users prioritizing a slightly more affordable option and don't heavily rely on fast charging. The Tecno Pova 3 is ideal for those who value quicker charging times, reverse charging for accessories, and a slightly more powerful chipset.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Tecno Pova 3 worth the extra money?
Yes, if you value faster charging and a better camera. The performance difference is minor, but the charging speed and reverse charging are significant advantages.
❓ Which phone has better gaming performance?
The Tecno Pova 3 has a slight edge due to its slightly more powerful Helio G88 chipset, but both are suitable for casual gaming.
