The Tecno Pova Curve and Realme 11 Pro+ represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. Both leverage MediaTek’s Dimensity series, but diverge significantly in charging speed and core architecture. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device best suits your needs, focusing on performance, battery life, and overall value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw speed and future-proofing, the Tecno Pova Curve emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 7300 Ultimate, built on a more efficient 4nm process, offers a performance edge over the Realme 11 Pro+'s 6nm Dimensity 7050. While the Realme 11 Pro+ boasts blazing-fast 100W charging, the Pova Curve’s more modern chipset provides a better long-term experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 - India |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA2000 1x |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, May 29 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, June 05 | Available. Released 2023, May 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, leather or plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 74.6 x 7.5 mm (6.47 x 2.94 x 0.30 in) | 161.6 x 73.9 x 8.2 mm or 8.7 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188.5 g (6.67 oz) | 183 g or 189 g (6.46 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2436 pixels (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 109.9 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 144Hz, 2304Hz PWM, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, HDR10+, 120Hz, 950 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Ultimate (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 15, planned upgrade to Android 16, HIOS 15 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades, Realme UI 5.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 200 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Panorama |
| Single | 13 MP | 32 MP, f/2.5, 22mm (wide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 45 min | 100W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5500 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Neon Cyan, Magic Silver, Geek Black | Astral Black, Sunrise Beige, Oasis Green |
| Models | LJ8k | RMX3740, RMX3741 |
| Price | About 170 EUR | € 399.90 / ₹ 27,990 |
Tecno Pova Curve
- More efficient 4nm Dimensity 7300 Ultimate chipset
- Potentially better sustained performance and thermal management
- Likely more competitive price point
- Slower 45W charging
- Display specs currently unknown
Realme 11 Pro+
- Blazing-fast 100W wired charging
- Bright 793 nit display for outdoor visibility
- 200MP main camera (widely known)
- Less efficient 6nm Dimensity 7050 chipset
- Potential for more thermal throttling
- May be more expensive
Display Comparison
The Realme 11 Pro+ features a display capable of reaching 793 nits of peak brightness, a strong showing for outdoor visibility. However, the Tecno Pova Curve’s display specifications are currently unavailable, making a direct brightness comparison difficult. Given Tecno’s focus on value, it’s likely to be competitive, but potentially not as bright. The Realme’s brightness is a clear advantage for users who frequently use their phones in direct sunlight. Without knowing the Pova Curve’s panel technology (LTPO or not), it’s hard to assess power efficiency, but the Realme’s brightness will consume more power.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera analysis is hampered by a lack of specific sensor information for both devices. However, the Realme 11 Pro+ is known for its 200MP main sensor (not provided in context, but widely known), which offers significant detail and potential for cropping. The Tecno Pova Curve’s camera specs are currently unknown, but given its price point, it’s likely to feature a more modest sensor. Without OIS information for either device, image stabilization will rely heavily on software processing. The Realme’s larger sensor will likely perform better in low-light conditions, but image processing style will ultimately determine the final image quality. We can assume both phones will include standard wide and ultrawide lenses, but the Realme’s 200MP sensor is a significant differentiator.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Tecno Pova Curve’s Dimensity 7300 Ultimate (4nm) utilizes a more modern architecture than the Realme 11 Pro+'s Dimensity 7050 (6nm). The 7300 Ultimate features four Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.5 GHz, compared to the 7050’s two Cortex-A78 cores at 2.6 GHz. While the 7050 has a slightly higher clock speed on its prime cores, the 7300 Ultimate’s four cores and the smaller 4nm node should translate to superior multi-core performance and better thermal management under sustained load. The 7300 Ultimate’s efficiency gains will be particularly noticeable during extended gaming sessions, reducing throttling. The Realme 11 Pro+’s CPU configuration (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) suggests a focus on single-core tasks, but the Pova Curve’s architecture is more balanced.
Battery Life
The Realme 11 Pro+ boasts 100W wired charging, capable of fully charging the battery in a remarkably short time. While the Tecno Pova Curve’s 45W charging is considerably slower (45 minutes to full), it’s still respectable. The Realme 11 Pro+ had an endurance rating of 112 hours, suggesting good battery optimization. However, the Dimensity 7300 Ultimate’s 4nm process in the Pova Curve should offer improved power efficiency, potentially offsetting the difference in charging speed. The 100W charging on the Realme is a convenience factor, but the Pova Curve’s efficiency could lead to comparable real-world battery life despite a potentially smaller battery capacity (not specified).
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Pova Curve if you need a phone that prioritizes sustained performance for gaming and demanding applications, and appreciate a more modern chipset architecture. Buy the Realme 11 Pro+ if you absolutely require the fastest possible charging speeds and value a brighter display, even if it means sacrificing some processing power and thermal efficiency.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 7050 in the Realme 11 Pro+ overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The 6nm Dimensity 7050 is a capable chipset, but its larger node size compared to the Tecno Pova Curve’s 7300 Ultimate means it’s more prone to thermal throttling during extended gaming. While the Realme 11 Pro+ likely has cooling solutions, the Pova Curve’s 4nm process offers inherent thermal advantages.
❓ Is the 45W charging on the Tecno Pova Curve slow compared to the 100W on the Realme 11 Pro+?
45W is slower than 100W, taking approximately 45 minutes for a full charge versus the Realme’s significantly faster time. However, the Tecno Pova Curve’s Dimensity 7300 Ultimate’s improved power efficiency may mean you won’t need to charge as frequently, mitigating the slower charging speed.
❓ How does the image processing differ between the Tecno Pova Curve and the Realme 11 Pro+?
Without sample images, it’s difficult to say definitively. However, Realme typically employs a more vibrant and saturated image processing style, while Tecno often aims for a more natural look. The Realme 11 Pro+'s 200MP sensor will allow for more detailed images, but the final result depends heavily on software algorithms.
