The Tecno Pova 7 and Samsung Galaxy A55 represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. The Pova 7 aggressively targets gamers with its powerful Dimensity 7300 Ultimate chipset and rapid charging, while the Galaxy A55 prioritizes a refined user experience, strong battery endurance, and Samsung’s established ecosystem. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and blazing-fast charging, the Tecno Pova 7 is the clear winner. However, the Samsung Galaxy A55 excels in sustained battery life and offers a more polished software experience, making it the better choice for everyday users who value longevity and reliability.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, July 04 | 2024, March 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, July 10 | Available. Released 2024, March 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), glass back (Gorilla Glass), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 167.3 x 75.6 x 8.9 mm (6.59 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) | 161.1 x 77.4 x 8.2 mm (6.34 x 3.05 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) |
| Weight | 207 g (7.30 oz) | 213 g (7.51 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~396 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~86.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~85.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 144Hz | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Ultimate (4 nm) | Exynos 1480 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Xclipse 530 |
| OS | Android 15, HIOS 15 | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, (wide), PDAF | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 13 MP, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio, recording | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 50% in 29 min, 100% in 69 min
30W wireless (magnetic)
10W reverse wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Geek Black, Magic Silver, Oasis Green | Iceblue, Lilac, Navy, Lemon |
| Models | LJ7 | SM-A556V, SM-A556B, SM-A556B/DS, SM-A556E, SM-A556E/DS, SM-A5560 |
| Price | ₹ 17,999 | $ 324.99 / £ 251.50 / € 319.99 / ₹ 23,998 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.68 W/kg (head) 1.04 W/kg (body) |
Tecno Pova 7
- Significantly faster charging (45W wired, 30W wireless)
- Potentially higher single-core CPU performance
- Reverse wireless charging capability
- Battery life likely inferior to the A55
- Camera details are currently unknown
Samsung Galaxy A55
- Exceptional battery life (13:27h active use)
- Brighter display (1010 nits)
- Refined software experience and long-term support
- Slower charging speed (25W wired)
- Potentially lower peak CPU performance
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A55 boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1010 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Tecno Pova 7’s display specifications are not provided, Samsung’s panel likely offers superior color accuracy and viewing angles. The A55’s brightness advantage is crucial for outdoor use and HDR content consumption. The absence of LTPO technology in either phone suggests both will rely on adaptive refresh rate switching to conserve battery, but the A55’s higher peak brightness is a clear advantage.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the Tecno Pova 7, a direct comparison is limited. However, Samsung’s Galaxy A55 is expected to deliver consistently high-quality images thanks to its image processing algorithms and likely larger sensor size. The A55’s camera system will likely prioritize balanced image quality across various lighting conditions, while the Pova 7 may lean towards more vibrant, social media-ready photos. The absence of information regarding OIS on the Pova 7 suggests the A55 will have an advantage in low-light photography and video stabilization.
Performance
Both the Tecno Pova 7 and Samsung Galaxy A55 utilize 4nm chipsets, but the architectural differences are noteworthy. The Pova 7’s MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultimate features a Cortex-A78 prime core clocked at 2.5 GHz, potentially offering a slight edge in single-core performance compared to the Galaxy A55’s Exynos 1480 with its 2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 cores. However, the Exynos 1480’s more refined process and potentially better thermal design could lead to more sustained performance under heavy load. Both phones share the same Cortex-A55 efficiency cores, suggesting similar performance in less demanding tasks. The Pova 7’s focus on gaming suggests optimized GPU drivers, potentially giving it an edge in graphically intensive applications.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A55 demonstrably leads in battery endurance, achieving 13 hours and 27 minutes of active use. While the Tecno Pova 7’s battery capacity is unknown, its 45W wired charging significantly outpaces the A55’s 25W charging. The Pova 7 can reach 50% charge in just 29 minutes and 100% in 69 minutes, a substantial advantage for users who need a quick power boost. Furthermore, the Pova 7 offers 30W wireless (magnetic) charging and 10W reverse wired charging, features absent on the A55. This makes the Pova 7 a more versatile option for charging accessories or other devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Pova 7 if you need a phone primarily for gaming, demanding multitasking, or frequently find yourself needing to top up your battery quickly. Its Dimensity 7300 Ultimate and 45W charging are geared towards power users. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A55 if you prefer a phone with exceptional battery life, a bright and vibrant display, and the seamless integration of Samsung’s software features and long-term support.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 1480 in the Galaxy A55 tend to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Exynos 1480 is generally well-regarded for its thermal management. While it can get warm during extended gaming, Samsung’s software optimizations and the phone’s cooling system are designed to prevent significant throttling. However, the Tecno Pova 7’s Dimensity 7300 Ultimate, with its focus on gaming, may offer slightly better sustained performance in demanding titles.
❓ How effective is the 30W wireless charging on the Tecno Pova 7, and is the magnetic alignment secure?
30W wireless charging is relatively fast for a mid-range phone, offering a convenient alternative to wired charging. The magnetic alignment ensures a secure connection, maximizing charging efficiency and preventing misalignment issues. While not as fast as the 45W wired charging, it’s a significant advantage over the Galaxy A55, which lacks wireless charging altogether.
❓ Is the difference in CPU clock speeds (2.75 GHz vs 2.5 GHz) between the Exynos 1480 and Dimensity 7300 Ultimate noticeable in everyday tasks?
The difference in clock speed is unlikely to be noticeable in most everyday tasks like browsing, social media, or video playback. Both chipsets are more than capable of handling these workloads smoothly. The difference will be more apparent in CPU-intensive applications like video editing or demanding games.
