The Tecno Pova 7 and Realme 12 Pro+ represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. The Pova 7 aggressively targets gamers with its powerful Dimensity 7300 Ultimate chipset, while the Realme 12 Pro+ prioritizes all-day battery life and a refined user experience. This comparison dives deep into their specifications to determine which device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and faster charging, the Tecno Pova 7 is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 7300 Ultimate offers a noticeable edge in processing power. However, the Realme 12 Pro+ excels in battery endurance, lasting nearly 13.5 hours of active use, making it ideal for power users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, July 04 | 2024, January 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, July 10 | Available. Released 2024, January 29 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 167.3 x 75.6 x 8.9 mm (6.59 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) | 161.5 x 74 x 8.8 mm (6.36 x 2.91 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 207 g (7.30 oz) | 196 g (6.91 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~396 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~86.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 144Hz | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Ultimate (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Adreno 710 |
| OS | Android 15, HIOS 15 | Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, (wide), PDAF | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
64 MP, f/2.8, 71mm, (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 13 MP, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio, recording | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 50% in 29 min, 100% in 69 min
30W wireless (magnetic)
10W reverse wired | 67W wired, 50% in 19 min |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Geek Black, Magic Silver, Oasis Green | Submarine Blue, Navigator Beige, Explorer Red |
| Models | LJ7 | RMX3840, RMX3841 |
| Price | ₹ 17,999 | $ 465.00 / £ 299.00 / € 344.26 / ₹ 28,400 |
Tecno Pova 7
- More powerful CPU for demanding tasks
- Faster charging speeds (wired)
- Wireless charging support
- Battery life likely shorter than Realme 12 Pro+
- Display brightness likely lower than Realme 12 Pro+
Realme 12 Pro+
- Exceptional battery life (13:24h active use)
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Faster 50% charge time
- Less powerful CPU compared to Tecno Pova 7
- No wireless charging support
Display Comparison
The Realme 12 Pro+ boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 802 nits, which translates to better visibility under direct sunlight. While the Tecno Pova 7’s display specifications are not provided, Realme’s panel offers a tangible advantage in outdoor scenarios. Both devices utilize a 4nm chipset, suggesting similar power efficiency in display operation, but the Realme’s higher peak brightness is a key differentiator. The absence of refresh rate data for the Pova 7 makes a direct comparison difficult, but the Realme 12 Pro+ likely offers a smoother visual experience if it supports a higher refresh rate.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the Tecno Pova 7, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Realme 12 Pro+ likely benefits from Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, potentially offering improved image processing and noise reduction. The Realme 12 Pro+’s camera system is likely optimized for balanced image quality across various lighting conditions. The absence of sensor size or aperture information for the Pova 7 makes it difficult to assess its low-light performance capabilities. It's reasonable to assume the Realme 12 Pro+ offers a more refined and consistent camera experience.
Performance
The Tecno Pova 7’s Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Ultimate (4nm) and the Realme 12 Pro+’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4nm) are both built on efficient 4nm processes. However, the Dimensity 7300 Ultimate features a more powerful CPU configuration – four Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.5 GHz versus the Snapdragon’s 2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 cores. This suggests the Pova 7 will deliver superior performance in CPU-intensive tasks and gaming. While both chipsets utilize the same Cortex-A55 efficiency cores, the Pova 7’s higher clock speed provides a performance edge. The lack of GPU details prevents a complete performance assessment, but the Dimensity 7300 Ultimate is generally considered a stronger performer.
Battery Life
The Realme 12 Pro+ demonstrably excels in battery life, achieving 13 hours and 24 minutes of active use. While the Tecno Pova 7’s battery capacity is unknown, the Realme’s endurance is a significant advantage for users who heavily rely on their smartphones throughout the day. The Realme 12 Pro+ supports 67W wired charging, reaching 50% charge in just 19 minutes, while the Tecno Pova 7 takes 29 minutes with its 45W charger. The Pova 7 adds the convenience of 30W wireless (magnetic) charging and 10W reverse wired charging, features absent on the Realme 12 Pro+, offering greater versatility.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Pova 7 if you need a phone primarily for gaming, demanding multitasking, or appreciate the convenience of both wired and wireless charging. Its 45W wired and 30W wireless charging capabilities are a significant advantage. Buy the Realme 12 Pro+ if you prioritize exceptional battery life, a brighter display for outdoor visibility, and a more balanced overall experience, even if it means sacrificing some peak performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 7300 Ultimate in the Tecno Pova 7 get hot during extended gaming sessions?
While the 4nm process helps with thermal efficiency, prolonged gaming on the Tecno Pova 7 will likely generate heat. The device's thermal management system will throttle performance to prevent overheating, but this may result in reduced frame rates over extended periods. The Realme 12 Pro+’s Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 may exhibit similar behavior, but the Pova 7 is more likely to reach throttling thresholds due to its higher performance ceiling.
❓ How effective is the 30W wireless charging on the Tecno Pova 7 compared to the 67W wired charging on the Realme 12 Pro+?
While 30W wireless charging is convenient, it's significantly slower than the Realme 12 Pro+'s 67W wired charging. The Realme 12 Pro+ can reach 50% charge in 19 minutes, whereas the Tecno Pova 7 takes 29 minutes for the same level with wired charging. Wireless charging will take considerably longer. The Pova 7’s wireless charging is a bonus feature, but the Realme 12 Pro+ offers superior charging speed when wired.
❓ Is the lack of detailed camera specs on the Tecno Pova 7 a major concern?
Yes, the absence of information regarding sensor size, aperture, and image processing algorithms makes it difficult to assess the Pova 7’s camera capabilities. The Realme 12 Pro+ benefits from Qualcomm’s ISP, suggesting a more refined camera experience. Without comparable data, it’s reasonable to assume the Realme 12 Pro+ offers more consistent and reliable image quality.
