The Tecno Pova 7 Ultra and Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. The Pova 7 Ultra aggressively targets gamers with a powerful chipset, while the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ prioritizes a balanced experience with a focus on fast charging and all-day battery life. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw gaming performance and don't mind slightly slower charging, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is the clear winner. However, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ delivers a more refined, all-around experience with its incredibly fast 120W charging and excellent battery endurance, making it the better choice for the average user.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA- International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, June 20 | 2023, September 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, July | Available. Released 2023, September 21 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 160 x 75.2 x 8.9 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.35 in) | 161.4 x 74.2 x 8.9 mm (6.35 x 2.92 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 199 g or 204.5 g (7.02 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~460 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, 2592Hz PWM, 4500 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Ultimate (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali G615-MC6 | Mali-G610 MC4 |
| OS | Android 15, HIOS 15 | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 108 MP, (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 200 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | Yes | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 70W wired, 50% in 18 min, 100% in 44 min
30W wireless (magnetic)
10W reverse wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 19 min |
| Type | 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Geek White, Geek Black | Midnight Black (Fushion Black), Moonlight White (Fushion White), Aurora Purple, Fushion Purple, Camo Green |
| Models | LJ9 | 23090RA98C, 23090RA98G, 23090RA98I |
| Price | - | $ 299.98 / £ 299.00 / € 208.98 / ₹ 24,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.85 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.98 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
Tecno Pova 7 Ultra
- More powerful processor for gaming
- Faster CPU clock speeds
- 30W wireless charging support
- Slower wired charging compared to Redmi
- Battery life potentially lower than Redmi
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+
- Incredibly fast 120W wired charging
- Excellent battery life (10:38h active use)
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Less powerful processor than Tecno
- No wireless charging support
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1283 nits, which translates to superior visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While the Pova 7 Ultra’s display specs are not provided, the Redmi’s brightness advantage is substantial. Both devices utilize 4nm chipsets, suggesting similar power efficiency in display operation, but the Redmi’s higher peak brightness is a clear advantage for outdoor usability. We expect both to be AMOLED panels, but the Redmi’s brightness is a key differentiator.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ likely benefits from Xiaomi’s established image processing algorithms. The focus should be on the main sensor resolution and aperture, as these are the primary determinants of image quality. The Redmi’s image processing is known for vibrant colors and good dynamic range, while Tecno often prioritizes detail. The absence of information on the Pova 7 Ultra’s camera system makes it difficult to assess its capabilities accurately.
Performance
The Tecno Pova 7 Ultra’s Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Ultimate chipset, featuring a 3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 core, offers a performance edge over the Redmi Note 13 Pro+'s Dimensity 7200 Ultra (2.8 GHz Cortex-A715). The Pova 7 Ultra’s CPU configuration – 1x3.35 GHz + 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 + 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510 – is more aggressive than the Redmi’s 2x2.8 GHz + 6x2.0 GHz configuration, indicating superior multi-core performance. This translates to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and higher frame rates in demanding games. However, the Dimensity 7200 Ultra is still a capable performer, and the difference may not be noticeable in everyday tasks.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ shines in battery charging speed, achieving a full charge in just 19 minutes with its 120W wired charging. The Tecno Pova 7 Ultra, while offering respectable 70W wired charging (50% in 18 min, 100% in 44 min) and 30W wireless charging, falls behind in charging speed. The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ also boasts an impressive 10:38h active use score, suggesting excellent battery endurance. While the Pova 7 Ultra’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the Redmi’s combination of fast charging and long battery life is a significant advantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra if you need uncompromising gaming performance, frequently play demanding titles for extended periods, and value a powerful processor above all else. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ if you prefer a phone that excels in battery life, charges incredibly quickly, and offers a more balanced feature set for everyday use and casual gaming.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 8350 Ultimate in the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra get hot during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 8350 Ultimate is a 4nm chip, which generally offers good thermal efficiency. However, sustained high performance will inevitably generate heat. The Pova 7 Ultra’s cooling system (details not provided) will be crucial in mitigating throttling. Expect some heat, but likely not to the point of significant performance degradation.
❓ How does the 120W charging of the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ affect battery health over the long term?
Xiaomi employs charging algorithms designed to minimize battery degradation with its 120W HyperCharge technology. While faster charging *can* contribute to battery wear over years of use, the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ incorporates safeguards like optimized charging curves and temperature control to mitigate this effect. Expect minimal noticeable degradation within the typical 2-3 year smartphone ownership cycle.
❓ Is the 30W wireless charging on the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra fast enough for convenient daily use?
30W wireless charging is a respectable speed, but it's significantly slower than the Redmi Note 13 Pro+'s 120W wired charging. It's convenient for overnight charging or topping up, but won't provide the same rapid boost as wired charging. Expect a full wireless charge to take considerably longer than a wired charge.
