The Tecno Pova 7 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy A55 represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The Pova 7 Ultra aggressively targets gamers with a powerful chipset and rapid charging, while the Galaxy A55 focuses on a balanced experience with a strong emphasis on battery endurance and a refined display. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and lightning-fast charging, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is the clear winner. However, the Samsung Galaxy A55 delivers superior battery life, a brighter display, and Samsung’s established software ecosystem, making it the better choice for everyday users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, June 20 | 2024, March 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, July | Available. Released 2024, March 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), glass back (Gorilla Glass), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 160 x 75.2 x 8.9 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.35 in) | 161.1 x 77.4 x 8.2 mm (6.34 x 3.05 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) |
| Weight | - | 213 g (7.51 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~460 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~85.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, 2592Hz PWM, 4500 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Ultimate (4 nm) | Exynos 1480 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali G615-MC6 | Xclipse 530 |
| OS | Android 15, HIOS 15 | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 108 MP, (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 13 MP, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 70W wired, 50% in 18 min, 100% in 44 min
30W wireless (magnetic)
10W reverse wired | 25W wired |
| Type | 6000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Geek White, Geek Black | Iceblue, Lilac, Navy, Lemon |
| Models | LJ9 | SM-A556V, SM-A556B, SM-A556B/DS, SM-A556E, SM-A556E/DS, SM-A5560 |
| Price | - | $ 324.99 / £ 251.50 / € 319.99 / ₹ 23,998 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.68 W/kg (head) 1.04 W/kg (body) |
Tecno Pova 7 Ultra
- Significantly faster charging (70W wired, 30W wireless)
- More powerful processor (Dimensity 8350 Ultimate)
- Likely higher peak gaming performance
- Battery life likely shorter than Galaxy A55
- Software support may be less consistent than Samsung
Samsung Galaxy A55
- Exceptional battery life (13:27h active use)
- Brighter and more color-accurate display (1010 nits)
- Samsung’s established software ecosystem and updates
- Slower charging speed (25W wired)
- Less powerful processor (Exynos 1480)
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A55 boasts a measured peak brightness of 1010 nits, significantly outshining the likely lower peak brightness of the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra (spec not provided). While the Pova 7 Ultra likely features a high refresh rate, the A55’s panel benefits from Samsung’s color science and potentially better viewing angles. The absence of LTPO technology in either device suggests both will rely on adaptive refresh rate switching to conserve battery, but the A55’s superior brightness makes it more usable outdoors.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Galaxy A55’s image processing benefits from Samsung’s extensive software optimization. While the Pova 7 Ultra may feature a higher megapixel count, the A55’s image stabilization (OIS) and refined algorithms are likely to produce more consistent and visually appealing results, particularly in low-light conditions. We can assume the Pova 7 Ultra will focus on quantity of sensors, while the A55 will prioritize quality.
Performance
The Tecno Pova 7 Ultra’s Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Ultimate, built on a 4nm process, offers a substantial performance advantage over the Samsung Galaxy A55’s Exynos 1480 (also 4nm). The Dimensity 8350’s CPU configuration – 1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715, 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715, and 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510 – is architecturally more potent than the A55’s 4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. This translates to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and significantly better gaming performance. However, the Exynos 1480’s efficiency could lead to better sustained performance under prolonged load, mitigating potential throttling.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A55’s 13:27h active use score demonstrates exceptional battery life. The Tecno Pova 7 Ultra compensates with incredibly fast charging: 70W wired (50% in 18 minutes, 100% in 44 minutes) and 30W wireless (magnetic). While the Pova 7 Ultra’s battery capacity is unknown, the A55’s endurance is a significant advantage for users who prioritize minimizing charging frequency. The Pova 7 Ultra’s 10W reverse wired charging is a niche feature, while the A55 lacks reverse wireless charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra if you need uncompromising gaming performance, require the fastest possible charging speeds, and prioritize a high-refresh-rate display for immersive visuals. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A55 if you prefer all-day battery life, a brighter and more color-accurate display, and a polished software experience with guaranteed updates.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 1480 in the Galaxy A55 overheat during extended gaming sessions?
While the Exynos 1480 is not a flagship-level chip, its 4nm process and Samsung’s thermal management typically prevent significant overheating during moderate gaming. However, prolonged, graphically intensive games may lead to some throttling to maintain stable performance. The Pova 7 Ultra's Dimensity 8350 Ultimate will likely run hotter, but also sustain higher clocks for longer.
❓ How effective is the 70W charging on the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra in real-world use?
The 70W charging on the Pova 7 Ultra is exceptionally fast. Tecno claims 50% charge in 18 minutes and 100% in 44 minutes. This is significantly faster than the Galaxy A55’s 25W charging, allowing for quick top-ups throughout the day. The inclusion of 30W wireless charging is also a major advantage.
❓ Is the lack of a dedicated telephoto lens on either phone a significant drawback?
Both phones omit a dedicated telephoto lens, relying on digital zoom. While digital zoom can provide some magnification, it results in a loss of image quality. Users who frequently take zoomed-in photos may find this limitation noticeable, but it's a common trade-off in this price segment.
❓ What kind of gaming performance can I expect from the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra?
The Dimensity 8350 Ultimate in the Pova 7 Ultra is capable of running most mobile games at high or ultra settings with smooth frame rates. It should handle demanding titles like Genshin Impact and PUBG Mobile with ease. The high refresh rate display further enhances the gaming experience.
