The Tecno Pova 7 Ultra and Realme 12 Pro+ represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The Pova 7 Ultra aggressively targets gamers with a high-end chipset, while the Realme 12 Pro+ focuses on a balanced experience with a strong emphasis on battery life and everyday usability. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw gaming performance and rapid charging, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is the clear winner. However, the Realme 12 Pro+ offers superior battery endurance and a more refined all-around experience, making it the better choice for mainstream users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, June 20 | 2024, January 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, July | Available. Released 2024, January 29 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 160 x 75.2 x 8.9 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.35 in) | 161.5 x 74 x 8.8 mm (6.36 x 2.91 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 196 g (6.91 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | - |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~460 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, 2592Hz PWM, 4500 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Ultimate (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali G615-MC6 | Adreno 710 |
| OS | Android 15, HIOS 15 | Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 108 MP, (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
64 MP, f/2.8, 71mm, (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 13 MP, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 70W wired, 50% in 18 min, 100% in 44 min
30W wireless (magnetic)
10W reverse wired | 67W wired, 50% in 19 min |
| Type | 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Geek White, Geek Black | Submarine Blue, Navigator Beige, Explorer Red |
| Models | LJ9 | RMX3840, RMX3841 |
| Price | - | $ 465.00 / £ 299.00 / € 344.26 / ₹ 28,400 |
Tecno Pova 7 Ultra
- Significantly more powerful processor for gaming
- Faster wired and wireless charging speeds
- Reverse wireless charging capability
- Battery life potentially lower than Realme 12 Pro+
- Camera specs currently unknown
Realme 12 Pro+
- Excellent all-day battery life (13:24h active use)
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility (802 nits)
- Balanced performance for everyday tasks
- Slower charging speeds compared to Tecno Pova 7 Ultra
- Less powerful processor for demanding games
Display Comparison
The Realme 12 Pro+ boasts a measured peak brightness of 802 nits, providing excellent visibility in bright sunlight. While the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra’s display specs are currently unavailable, Realme’s figure suggests a significant advantage in outdoor readability. Both devices utilize 4nm chipsets, which contribute to power efficiency and potentially better display performance. Without knowing the Pova 7 Ultra’s panel technology (OLED vs LCD, refresh rate), it’s difficult to assess color accuracy and smoothness, but the Realme 12 Pro+ likely holds an edge in these areas given its brightness and presumed panel quality.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specs for the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra are currently unavailable. The Realme 12 Pro+’s camera system is likely to focus on its primary sensor and image processing capabilities. Without knowing the Pova 7 Ultra’s sensor size, aperture, and OIS implementation, it’s difficult to make a direct comparison. However, the Realme 12 Pro+’s image processing is known for its vibrant colors and detail, making it a strong contender for everyday photography. We can assume the Pova 7 Ultra will lean towards a gaming-focused aesthetic, potentially with more aggressive sharpening and contrast. The absence of detailed camera information for the Pova 7 Ultra makes a definitive assessment impossible.
Performance
The Tecno Pova 7 Ultra’s Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Ultimate, built on a 4nm process, is a significantly more powerful chipset than the Realme 12 Pro+'s Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (also 4nm). The Dimensity 8350 Ultimate features a core configuration of 1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715, 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715, and 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510, offering a substantial performance uplift over the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2’s 4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and significantly better gaming performance on the Pova 7 Ultra. However, the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2’s efficiency could lead to better sustained performance under prolonged load, mitigating some of the Dimensity’s raw power advantage. The Pova 7 Ultra is likely to excel in benchmarks and demanding games, while the Realme 12 Pro+ will provide a fluid experience for everyday tasks.
Battery Life
The Realme 12 Pro+ demonstrates impressive battery life, achieving 13:24 hours of active use. The Tecno Pova 7 Ultra’s battery capacity is unknown, but its 70W wired charging (50% in 18 min, 100% in 44 min) and 30W wireless charging (magnetic) significantly outperform the Realme 12 Pro+'s 67W wired charging (50% in 19 min). While the Pova 7 Ultra may have a smaller battery, its faster charging speeds could offset this difference for users who prioritize quick top-ups. The addition of 10W reverse wired charging on the Pova 7 Ultra is a useful feature for charging accessories, absent on the Realme 12 Pro+.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra if you need uncompromising gaming performance, demand the fastest possible charging speeds (both wired and wireless), and frequently engage in graphically intensive tasks. Buy the Realme 12 Pro+ if you prioritize all-day battery life, a brighter display for outdoor visibility, and a more balanced smartphone experience without sacrificing performance for everyday tasks.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 8350 Ultimate in the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra generate excessive heat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 8350 Ultimate is a powerful chip, its 4nm fabrication process helps mitigate heat generation. However, sustained gaming will inevitably produce heat. The Pova 7 Ultra’s thermal management system (details currently unavailable) will be crucial in preventing significant throttling and maintaining consistent performance. Expect some warmth, but likely not to the point of discomfort.
❓ How does the 67W charging on the Realme 12 Pro+ compare to the 70W charging on the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra in real-world usage?
Although the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra has a slightly higher charging wattage (70W vs 67W), the difference in charging times is minimal. The Pova 7 Ultra reaches 50% in 18 minutes and 100% in 44 minutes, while the Realme 12 Pro+ reaches 50% in 19 minutes. The practical difference is negligible for most users, making the Realme 12 Pro+'s charging speed perfectly adequate.
❓ Is the 30W wireless charging on the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra significantly faster than standard wireless charging?
Yes, 30W wireless charging is considerably faster than the typical 15W-20W wireless charging found on many smartphones. This allows for a more convenient and quicker wireless charging experience, especially when combined with a compatible magnetic charger.
