The Tecno Pova 7 Pro and Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. Both devices leverage MediaTek's Dimensity series, but target slightly different priorities – the Pova 7 Pro emphasizing rapid charging and a robust feature set, while the Poco X6 Pro focuses on raw processing power and display quality. This comparison will dissect their strengths and weaknesses to determine which phone best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing gaming and sustained performance, the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset delivers a significant performance advantage, complemented by a brighter display. However, the Tecno Pova 7 Pro’s faster wireless charging and potentially lower price point make it a strong contender for those prioritizing convenience and value.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, July 04 | 2024, January 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, July 10 | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 163.5 x 75.9 x 8.2 mm (6.44 x 2.99 x 0.32 in) | 160.5 x 74.3 x 8.3 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 186 g or 190 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1224 x 2720 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~440 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 144Hz, 2304Hz PWM, 4500 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Ultimate (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali G615-MC6 |
| OS | Android 15, HIOS 15 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, (wide), 1/1.73", PDAF
8 MP, (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 50% in 26 min, 100% in 61 min
30W wireless (magnetic)
10W reverse wired | 67W wired, QC2.0, PD3.0, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Geek Black, Dynamic Grey, Neon Cyan | Black, Yellow, Gray |
| Models | LJ8 | 2311DRK48G, 2311DRK48I |
| Price | About 190 EUR | € 195.30 / $ 209.79 / £ 274.99 / ₹ 21,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
Tecno Pova 7 Pro
- 30W Wireless Charging (Magnetic)
- 45W Fast Wired Charging
- 10W Reverse Wired Charging
- Potentially Lower Price
- Less Powerful Chipset
- Likely Lower Display Brightness
- Camera performance likely inferior
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro
- Dimensity 8300 Ultra – Superior Performance
- 1148 Nits Peak Brightness – Excellent Visibility
- 67W Fast Wired Charging
- Longer Battery Life (11:46h active use)
- No Wireless Charging
- No Reverse Wired Charging
- Potentially Higher Price
Display Comparison
The Poco X6 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1148 nits. This is crucial for outdoor visibility and HDR content consumption. While the Pova 7 Pro’s display specifications are not provided, it’s likely to be dimmer. The X6 Pro’s brightness advantage, combined with its likely higher color accuracy (typical of Xiaomi’s displays), makes it the superior choice for multimedia enthusiasts. We can infer that the X6 Pro likely uses a higher quality panel, potentially AMOLED, given its brightness level.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the Pova 7 Pro, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Poco X6 Pro is expected to offer a more refined camera experience, leveraging Xiaomi’s image processing algorithms. The X6 Pro likely features a larger main sensor and potentially optical image stabilization (OIS), resulting in better low-light performance and sharper images. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely irrelevant; these sensors typically offer limited image quality. Focus should be on the main sensor and video capabilities.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco X6 Pro’s Dimensity 8300 Ultra, with its 1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 core and three additional Cortex-A715 cores, represents a substantial leap over the Pova 7 Pro’s Dimensity 7300 Ultimate. The 8300 Ultra’s more powerful CPU and GPU will translate to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and higher frame rates in demanding games. The Pova 7 Pro’s Cortex-A78 cores are older architecture, and while still capable, will be outpaced by the X6 Pro. Both chips are built on a 4nm process, ensuring good efficiency, but the architectural advantages of the 8300 Ultra are undeniable.
Battery Life
The Poco X6 Pro demonstrates impressive battery life, achieving 11:46h of active use. While the Pova 7 Pro’s battery capacity is unknown, its 45W wired and 30W wireless charging capabilities are a key differentiator. The X6 Pro’s 67W wired charging is faster, reaching 100% in 45 minutes, but the Pova 7 Pro’s 30W wireless charging (magnetic) offers unparalleled convenience. The Pova 7 Pro also includes 10W reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the X6 Pro, allowing it to charge accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Pova 7 Pro if you need exceptionally fast wireless charging, prioritize a feature-rich experience, and are comfortable with potentially slightly lower peak performance. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro if you prefer a smoother gaming experience, a brighter and more vibrant display, and demand the highest possible processing power within this price bracket. The X6 Pro is the clear choice for demanding mobile gamers.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 8300 Ultra in the Poco X6 Pro get hot during extended gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 8300 Ultra is a highly efficient chip built on a 4nm process. While some heat generation is inevitable during prolonged gaming, the X6 Pro’s thermal management system is expected to effectively dissipate heat, preventing significant throttling and maintaining consistent performance. Reviews will be crucial to confirm real-world thermal performance.
❓ How practical is the 30W wireless charging on the Tecno Pova 7 Pro compared to the 67W wired charging on the Poco X6 Pro?
While 67W wired charging is faster overall, 30W wireless charging offers unparalleled convenience. You can simply place the Pova 7 Pro on a compatible charger without needing to plug in a cable. For users who frequently top up their battery throughout the day, the convenience of wireless charging may outweigh the speed advantage of wired charging.
❓ Is the reverse wired charging feature on the Pova 7 Pro useful for everyday scenarios?
The 10W reverse wired charging is ideal for topping up accessories like wireless earbuds, smartwatches, or even a friend’s phone in a pinch. It’s not a replacement for a dedicated power bank, but it’s a convenient feature to have when you’re on the go.
