The Tecno Pova 7 Pro and Samsung Galaxy A55 represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. While both devices operate within a similar price bracket, they diverge significantly in their core philosophies: the Pova 7 Pro aggressively targets gamers with a powerful chipset and rapid charging, while the Galaxy A55 prioritizes a balanced experience with a focus on battery endurance and a refined display.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and a polished software experience, the Samsung Galaxy A55 is the better choice. However, gamers and power users who demand maximum performance and lightning-fast charging will find the Tecno Pova 7 Pro a more compelling option.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, July 04 | 2024, March 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, July 10 | Available. Released 2024, March 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), glass back (Gorilla Glass), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.5 x 75.9 x 8.2 mm (6.44 x 2.99 x 0.32 in) | 161.1 x 77.4 x 8.2 mm (6.34 x 3.05 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 213 g (7.51 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Resolution | 1224 x 2720 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~440 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~85.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 144Hz, 2304Hz PWM, 4500 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Ultimate (4 nm) | Exynos 1480 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Xclipse 530 |
| OS | Android 15, HIOS 15 | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, (wide), 1/1.73", PDAF
8 MP, (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 13 MP, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 50% in 26 min, 100% in 61 min
30W wireless (magnetic)
10W reverse wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Geek Black, Dynamic Grey, Neon Cyan | Iceblue, Lilac, Navy, Lemon |
| Models | LJ8 | SM-A556V, SM-A556B, SM-A556B/DS, SM-A556E, SM-A556E/DS, SM-A5560 |
| Price | About 190 EUR | $ 324.99 / £ 251.50 / € 319.99 / ₹ 23,998 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.68 W/kg (head) 1.04 W/kg (body) |
Tecno Pova 7 Pro
- Faster charging speeds (45W wired, 30W wireless)
- Potentially superior gaming performance due to Dimensity 7300 Ultimate
- More aggressive thermal design for sustained performance
- Unknown battery capacity
- Software experience may be less refined than Samsung’s One UI
Samsung Galaxy A55
- Excellent battery life (13:27h active use)
- Brighter and more color-accurate display (1010 nits)
- Refined software experience with Samsung’s One UI
- Slower charging speeds (25W wired)
- Potentially less powerful GPU for demanding games
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A55 boasts a measured peak brightness of 1010 nits, providing excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Tecno Pova 7 Pro’s display specifications are not provided, Samsung’s panel is likely superior in color accuracy and viewing angles. The A55’s display technology, while not explicitly stated as LTPO, benefits from Samsung’s expertise in display manufacturing, potentially offering adaptive refresh rates for improved efficiency. The A55’s brighter display is a clear advantage for outdoor use and content consumption.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the Tecno Pova 7 Pro, a direct comparison is challenging. However, Samsung’s Galaxy A55 benefits from its established image processing pipeline and likely superior software algorithms. The A55’s main sensor size is unknown, but Samsung typically prioritizes image quality and stabilization. The Pova 7 Pro’s camera performance will likely rely heavily on software optimization to compete. It’s reasonable to assume the A55 will deliver more consistent and refined image quality across various lighting conditions.
Performance
Both the Tecno Pova 7 Pro and Samsung Galaxy A55 utilize 4nm chipsets, but the underlying architectures differ. The Pova 7 Pro’s MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultimate features a Cortex-A78 prime core clocked at 2.5 GHz, while the Galaxy A55’s Exynos 1480 uses a slightly faster 2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 core. However, the Dimensity 7300 Ultimate’s newer architecture and potentially more efficient GPU give it an edge in sustained gaming performance. Both phones share the same Cortex-A55 efficiency cores, suggesting similar performance in less demanding tasks. The Pova 7 Pro’s focus on gaming is further reinforced by its likely more aggressive thermal design, allowing it to maintain peak performance for longer durations.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A55 demonstrably leads in battery endurance, achieving an active use score of 13 hours and 27 minutes. The Tecno Pova 7 Pro compensates with significantly faster charging: 45W wired (50% in 26 minutes, 100% in 61 minutes) and 30W wireless (magnetic), alongside 10W reverse wired charging. The A55 is limited to 25W wired charging. While the Pova 7 Pro’s battery capacity is unknown, the faster charging speeds mitigate the impact of a potentially smaller battery, allowing users to quickly top up throughout the day. The A55’s longevity is ideal for users who prioritize minimizing charging frequency.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Pova 7 Pro if you need uncompromising gaming performance, require the fastest possible charging speeds, and are comfortable with a potentially less refined software experience. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A55 if you prefer a long-lasting battery, a brighter and more color-accurate display, and Samsung’s established One UI software ecosystem.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 1480 in the Galaxy A55 tend to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Exynos 1480 is a capable chip, it's known to exhibit some thermal throttling under sustained heavy load. Samsung’s software optimizations help mitigate this, but users engaging in extended gaming may experience some performance dips. The Tecno Pova 7 Pro, with its Dimensity 7300 Ultimate and potentially more robust cooling, is likely to maintain higher sustained performance.
❓ How effective is the 30W wireless charging on the Tecno Pova 7 Pro, and is the magnetic alignment secure?
30W wireless charging is relatively fast for a mid-range phone, offering a convenient alternative to wired charging. The magnetic alignment ensures a secure connection, maximizing charging efficiency and preventing misalignment issues. While not as fast as the 45W wired charging, it’s a significant advantage over the Galaxy A55’s lack of wireless charging.
❓ Is the difference in CPU clock speeds (2.75 GHz on A55 vs 2.5 GHz on Pova 7 Pro) noticeable in everyday tasks?
The difference in CPU clock speeds is unlikely to be noticeable in most everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and messaging. Both chipsets are more than capable of handling these workloads. The performance gap will become more apparent in demanding applications like video editing or graphically intensive games.
❓ What type of storage and RAM does each phone use, and how does this impact performance?
While not explicitly stated, both phones likely utilize UFS 3.1 storage for fast app loading and file transfer speeds. The RAM type is also likely LPDDR5X in both devices, contributing to smoother multitasking. Faster storage and RAM are crucial for overall system responsiveness and a fluid user experience.
