Tecno and Infinix consistently deliver compelling value in the mid-range smartphone market. The Pova 7 Pro and Note 40 Pro represent their latest attempts to capture the attention of budget-conscious gamers and power users. This comparison dissects their key differences, focusing on chipset performance, charging capabilities, and overall user experience to determine which device offers the most bang for your buck.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and faster charging, the Tecno Pova 7 Pro emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 7300 Ultimate, built on a more efficient 4nm process, provides a noticeable edge in demanding tasks. However, the Infinix Note 40 Pro’s MagCharge wireless capabilities and potentially more refined software experience make it a strong contender.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, July 04 | 2024, March 18 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, July 10 | Available. Released 2024, March 19 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 163.5 x 75.9 x 8.2 mm (6.44 x 2.99 x 0.32 in) | 164.3 x 74.5 x 8.1 mm (6.47 x 2.93 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 190 g or 196 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Resolution | 1224 x 2720 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~440 ppi density) | 1080 x 2436 pixels (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 109.9 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 144Hz, 2304Hz PWM, 4500 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Ultimate (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7020 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | IMG BXM-8-256 |
| OS | Android 15, HIOS 15 | Android 14, XOS 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | Unspecified |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, (wide), 1/1.73", PDAF
8 MP, (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS
2 MP, f/2.4
2 MP, f/2.4 |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Dual-LED flash |
| Single | 13 MP, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1" |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 50% in 26 min, 100% in 61 min
30W wireless (magnetic)
10W reverse wired | 45W wired, 50% in 26 min
20W wireless MagCharge
Reverse wired
Reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Geek Black, Dynamic Grey, Neon Cyan | Vintage Green, Titan Gold, Racing Edition |
| Models | LJ8 | X6851 |
| Price | About 190 EUR | About 280 EUR |
Tecno Pova 7 Pro
- Superior chipset performance with Dimensity 7300 Ultimate
- Faster 30W wireless (magnetic) charging
- Reverse wired charging for added convenience
- Potentially less refined software experience (based on brand history)
- No information on display quality
Infinix Note 40 Pro
- Convenient MagCharge wireless charging compatibility
- Potentially smoother software experience
- Reverse wireless charging capability
- Less powerful Dimensity 7020 chipset
- Slower wireless charging speed
Display Comparison
While both devices likely feature similar LCD or AMOLED panels (data not provided), the core difference lies in the processing power driving them. Display quality will be a key differentiator, but without specific nit brightness or color gamut data, it's difficult to declare a winner. However, the Pova 7 Pro’s more powerful chipset could potentially handle more complex display processing tasks, like HDR upscaling, more efficiently.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is challenging. However, both phones likely target the mid-range segment, meaning image quality will depend heavily on software processing. The absence of information regarding sensor sizes and optical image stabilization (OIS) makes it difficult to assess potential low-light performance. We can assume both will offer a standard suite of camera modes, but the Pova 7 Pro’s more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor) within the Dimensity 7300 Ultimate could provide an advantage in image processing speed and quality.
Performance
The Tecno Pova 7 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Ultimate (4nm) significantly outpaces the Infinix Note 40 Pro’s Dimensity 7020 (6nm) on paper. The 7300 Ultimate boasts a more modern CPU configuration – four Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.5 GHz versus the Note 40 Pro’s two Cortex-A78 cores at 2.2 GHz. This translates to faster single-core and multi-core performance, benefiting demanding applications and gaming. The 4nm fabrication process also contributes to improved thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during extended gaming sessions. The Note 40 Pro’s 6nm chip is still capable, but will likely exhibit more performance limitations under sustained load.
Battery Life
Both devices offer 45W wired charging, achieving 50% charge in 26 minutes – a comparable speed. The Pova 7 Pro distinguishes itself with 30W wireless (magnetic) charging, significantly faster than the Note 40 Pro’s 20W MagCharge. While the Note 40 Pro adds reverse wireless charging, the Pova 7 Pro also offers 10W reverse *wired* charging, providing more versatility. The actual battery life will depend on the mAh capacity (not provided), but the Pova 7 Pro’s more efficient chipset could translate to longer runtimes despite potentially having a similar battery size.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Pova 7 Pro if you need uncompromising performance for gaming and content creation, and value the fastest possible wired and wireless charging speeds. Buy the Infinix Note 40 Pro if you prioritize convenient MagCharge wireless charging, a potentially smoother software experience, and a more balanced feature set, even if it means sacrificing some raw processing power.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 7300 Ultimate in the Pova 7 Pro handle demanding games like Genshin Impact at high settings?
Yes, the Dimensity 7300 Ultimate is a capable chipset that should handle Genshin Impact and other graphically intensive games at high settings, though you may need to adjust settings for sustained frame rates. The 4nm process and improved CPU architecture contribute to better thermal management, reducing the likelihood of significant throttling during extended gaming sessions.
❓ Is the 20W MagCharge on the Infinix Note 40 Pro significantly slower than standard wireless charging?
While 20W is slower than the Pova 7 Pro’s 30W magnetic wireless charging, MagCharge offers the convenience of secure attachment and alignment. The actual charging time difference will depend on the charger used, but expect a longer overall charge time compared to the Pova 7 Pro.
❓ Does the Tecno Pova 7 Pro support 5G connectivity?
While not explicitly stated, the Dimensity 7300 Ultimate chipset inherently supports 5G connectivity. Therefore, it is highly likely that the Tecno Pova 7 Pro supports 5G networks, but specific band compatibility will vary by region.
❓ How does the reverse charging feature on both phones compare in practical use?
The Infinix Note 40 Pro offers reverse *wireless* charging, ideal for topping up accessories like earbuds. The Tecno Pova 7 Pro provides reverse *wired* charging, which is faster and more efficient for charging other phones or devices, but requires a cable connection.
