The Tecno Pova 6 and Realme 12 Pro+ represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. The Pova 6 aggressively targets gamers with its focus on raw processing power, while the Realme 12 Pro+ prioritizes a balanced experience with a focus on battery endurance and a more refined chipset. This comparison dives deep into the specifics to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and a smoother, more efficient experience, the Realme 12 Pro+ is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 chipset and impressive 13:24h active use battery score outweigh the Pova 6’s raw processing power for most daily tasks.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, April 04 | 2024, January 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, May | Available. Released 2024, January 29 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 166.2 x 76.8 x 7.9 mm (6.54 x 3.02 x 0.31 in) | 161.5 x 74 x 8.8 mm (6.36 x 2.91 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 196 g (6.91 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~396 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~85.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 Ultimate (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 710 |
| OS | Android 14, HIOS 14 | Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 108 MP, (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
64 MP, f/2.8, 71mm, (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash | - |
| Single | 32 MP, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 70W wired, 50% in 20 min, 100% in 50 min
10W reverse wired | 67W wired, 50% in 19 min |
| Type | 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Interstellar Blue, Comet Green, Meteorite Grey | Submarine Blue, Navigator Beige, Explorer Red |
| Models | - | RMX3840, RMX3841 |
| Price | About 490 EUR | $ 465.00 / £ 299.00 / € 344.26 / ₹ 28,400 |
Tecno Pova 6
- Faster 70W wired charging
- Potentially higher peak gaming performance (due to CPU clock speed)
- 10W reverse wired charging
- Less efficient 6nm chipset
- Likely shorter battery life
- Missing display specifications (refresh rate, panel type)
Realme 12 Pro+
- Superior battery life (13:24h active use)
- More efficient 4nm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 chipset
- Brighter display (802 nits)
- Slightly slower 67W charging
- Potentially lower peak gaming performance compared to Pova 6
- No reverse wireless charging
Display Comparison
The Realme 12 Pro+ boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 802 nits. While the Pova 6’s display specifications are not provided, this brightness advantage on the Realme is crucial for outdoor visibility. The Realme’s panel likely benefits from the more advanced manufacturing process of the Snapdragon chipset, allowing for more efficient power delivery to the display. The absence of refresh rate data for the Pova 6 is a notable omission, potentially indicating a standard 60Hz panel compared to the likely 120Hz on the Realme, impacting smoothness.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the Tecno Pova 6, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Realme 12 Pro+ likely benefits from Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, offering improved image processing capabilities. The Realme’s camera system is likely to deliver more consistent results in various lighting conditions. The absence of information regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the Pova 6 suggests the Realme 12 Pro+ may offer superior image stabilization, especially for video recording. We can assume the Realme will have a more refined camera experience.
Performance
The Realme 12 Pro+ utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4nm), a more modern and efficient chipset compared to the Tecno Pova 6’s MediaTek Helio G99 Ultimate (6nm). The 4nm process node of the Snapdragon translates to better thermal efficiency, reducing throttling during sustained workloads. While the Pova 6’s Cortex-A76 cores offer a higher clock speed (2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz on the Realme’s A78 cores), the architectural improvements and core count advantage (4x A78 vs 2x A76) of the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 provide superior overall performance, particularly in multi-threaded tasks and gaming. The Realme’s chipset also benefits from a more advanced GPU.
Battery Life
The Realme 12 Pro+ shines in battery life, achieving an impressive 13:24 hours of active use. While the Tecno Pova 6’s battery capacity is not specified, its 70W charging (50% in 20 minutes, 100% in 50 minutes) is faster than the Realme’s 67W charging (50% in 19 minutes). However, the Realme’s superior chipset efficiency and longer battery life likely offset the slightly slower charging speed for most users. The Pova 6’s 10W reverse wired charging is a useful addition, but the Realme’s overall battery performance is more impactful.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Pova 6 if you are a mobile gamer who prioritizes maximizing frame rates and doesn't mind sacrificing some battery life for performance. It’s ideal for users who frequently engage in demanding games and appreciate the faster charging speeds. Buy the Realme 12 Pro+ if you value all-day battery life, a more efficient processor, and a generally smoother user experience. This phone is perfect for content consumers, social media users, and those who need a reliable device that can last through a full day of heavy use.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Helio G99 Ultimate in the Tecno Pova 6 throttle under sustained gaming loads?
The 6nm process of the Helio G99 Ultimate is less efficient than the 4nm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2. This means the Pova 6 is more likely to experience thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions, leading to reduced performance over time. While the initial burst performance might be high, it won't be sustained as effectively as on the Realme.
❓ How does the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 in the Realme 12 Pro+ handle popular games like PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty Mobile?
The Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 is well-equipped to handle PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty Mobile at high settings. While it may not achieve the absolute highest frame rates possible on flagship devices, it provides a smooth and consistent gaming experience with minimal stuttering. The improved thermal efficiency of the 4nm process ensures sustained performance during longer gaming sessions.
❓ Is the 70W charging on the Tecno Pova 6 significantly faster in real-world use than the 67W charging on the Realme 12 Pro+?
While the Tecno Pova 6 charges slightly faster on paper (50% in 20 mins vs 19 mins), the difference is minimal in practical use. The Realme 12 Pro+'s superior battery capacity and efficiency mean you'll likely spend less time overall plugged into a charger, despite the slightly slower charging speed.
