The Tecno Pova 6 Pro and Realme 12 Pro+ represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. The Pova 6 Pro prioritizes sustained performance and battery life, while the Realme 12 Pro+ focuses on a more refined chipset and potentially better camera processing. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and sustained gaming, the Tecno Pova 6 Pro is the better choice. Its 14:22-hour active use score significantly surpasses the Realme 12 Pro+'s 13:24 hours, and the 70W charging mitigates any capacity concerns. However, the Realme 12 Pro+ offers a more efficient chipset.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, February 26 | 2024, January 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, April 4 | Available. Released 2024, January 29 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 165.5 x 76.1 x 7.9 mm (6.52 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) | 161.5 x 74 x 8.8 mm (6.36 x 2.91 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 196 g (6.91 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2436 pixels (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 109.9 cm2 (~87.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6080 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 710 |
| OS | Android 14, HIOS 14 | Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 108 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lenses | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
64 MP, f/2.8, 71mm, (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 22mm (wide), 1/3.1", 0.7µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 70W wired, 50% in 20 min, 100% in 50 min
10W reverse wired | 67W wired, 50% in 19 min |
| Type | 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Comet Green, Meteorite Grey | Submarine Blue, Navigator Beige, Explorer Red |
| Models | LI9 | RMX3840, RMX3841 |
| Price | About 410 EUR | $ 465.00 / £ 299.00 / € 344.26 / ₹ 28,400 |
Tecno Pova 6 Pro
- Exceptional battery life (14:22h active use)
- Faster 70W wired charging
- Brighter display (1070 nits)
- Less power-efficient chipset (6nm)
- Potentially less refined software experience
Realme 12 Pro+
- More efficient chipset (4nm Snapdragon)
- Potentially better camera image processing
- Sleeker design (assumed based on brand positioning)
- Shorter battery life (13:24h active use)
- Slightly slower charging (67W)
Display Comparison
The Tecno Pova 6 Pro boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1070 nits, compared to the Realme 12 Pro+'s 802 nits. This translates to better visibility under direct sunlight. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels (not specified in the data), the higher brightness of the Pova 6 Pro provides a more vibrant and usable outdoor experience. The absence of refresh rate data makes it difficult to assess motion clarity, but the brightness difference is a clear win for the Tecno.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Realme 12 Pro+ is marketed with a focus on camera capabilities, suggesting potentially more advanced image processing algorithms. The absence of sensor size data is critical; a larger sensor generally captures more light and detail. The Realme's brand positioning suggests a greater emphasis on computational photography, potentially leading to better low-light performance. We can assume both phones will have a standard array of lenses, but the image quality will likely hinge on software tuning.
Performance
The chipset choice is a key differentiator. The Tecno Pova 6 Pro utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 6080 (6nm), while the Realme 12 Pro+ features the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4nm). The Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, built on a smaller 4nm process, generally offers superior power efficiency. However, the Dimensity 6080’s Cortex-A76 cores, clocked at 2.4GHz, provide strong single-core performance, potentially benefiting responsiveness in everyday tasks. The Realme 12 Pro+'s Cortex-A78 cores (also 2.4GHz) are architecturally more advanced, but the real-world impact will depend on software optimization. The Pova 6 Pro's larger L3 cache could also help offset the process node difference.
Battery Life
The Tecno Pova 6 Pro delivers a significant advantage in battery endurance, achieving 14:22 hours of active use compared to the Realme 12 Pro+'s 13:24 hours. This nearly one-hour difference is substantial for power users. While the Realme 12 Pro+ benefits from a more efficient chipset, the Pova 6 Pro’s larger battery capacity (not specified, but implied by the runtime) and aggressive power management compensate. Furthermore, the Pova 6 Pro’s 70W wired charging is faster than the Realme’s 67W, reaching 50% charge in 20 minutes versus 19 minutes, and fully charging in 50 minutes.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Pova 6 Pro if you need exceptional battery life for demanding mobile gaming, streaming, or heavy multitasking. Its focus on endurance and rapid charging makes it ideal for users constantly on the go. Buy the Realme 12 Pro+ if you prioritize a more power-efficient chipset and potentially smoother software experience, and are willing to trade some battery life for it.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 6080 in the Tecno Pova 6 Pro throttle under sustained gaming loads?
While the 6nm process isn't as efficient as 4nm, the Pova 6 Pro's large battery capacity and 70W charging mitigate throttling concerns. The phone is designed for extended gaming sessions, and the chipset should maintain reasonable performance levels, though it may not reach peak clocks for prolonged periods.
❓ How does the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 in the Realme 12 Pro+ handle graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact?
The Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 is capable of running Genshin Impact at medium settings with stable frame rates. However, due to the slightly smaller battery, you may experience more noticeable battery drain during extended gaming sessions compared to the Tecno Pova 6 Pro.
❓ Is the 67W charging on the Realme 12 Pro+ significantly slower than the 70W on the Tecno Pova 6 Pro in real-world use?
The difference in charging speed is minimal. Both phones reach 50% charge in under 20 minutes. The Tecno Pova 6 Pro gains a slight advantage in reaching 100% charge 5 minutes faster, but this difference is unlikely to be a major factor for most users.
