The Tecno Pova 6 Pro and Motorola Edge 40 Neo represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. While both devices aim for a sweet spot of features and affordability, they prioritize different strengths. The Pova 6 Pro aggressively targets endurance with a massive battery and rapid charging, while the Edge 40 Neo focuses on a more polished experience with a slightly more powerful chipset and a sleek design.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing all-day (and then some) battery life, the Tecno Pova 6 Pro is the clear winner, offering over 4 hours more active use than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo. However, the Edge 40 Neo’s Dimensity 7030 provides a slight performance edge and a more refined user experience, making it ideal for those who value responsiveness and a premium feel.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, February 26 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, April 4 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 165.5 x 76.1 x 7.9 mm (6.52 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2436 pixels (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 109.9 cm2 (~87.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 1300 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6080 (6 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 14, HIOS 14 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 108 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lenses | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | Dual-LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 22mm (wide), 1/3.1", 0.7µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 70W wired, 50% in 20 min, 100% in 50 min
10W reverse wired | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Comet Green, Meteorite Grey | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | LI9 | XT2307-1 |
| Price | About 410 EUR | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
Tecno Pova 6 Pro
- Exceptional battery life (14:22h active use)
- Faster 70W wired charging
- 10W reverse wired charging
- Slightly less powerful chipset
- Limited camera information
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- More powerful Dimensity 7030 chipset
- Potentially better camera image processing
- Sleek and modern design
- Significantly shorter battery life (10:28h active use)
- Slower charging speed
Display Comparison
Both the Tecno Pova 6 Pro and Motorola Edge 40 Neo boast vibrant displays with a measured peak brightness of around 1070 nits. This ensures excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While both offer a good viewing experience, the specifics of panel technology (like LTPO for variable refresh rates) aren't provided, suggesting both likely utilize standard AMOLED panels. The similarity in peak brightness means neither device significantly outperforms the other in outdoor readability.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications are limited, but the Motorola Edge 40 Neo is marketed with a focus on photo and video capabilities. Without knowing sensor sizes or aperture values, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. The Pova 6 Pro’s camera specs are largely unknown, and focusing on the 2MP macro lens would be a misdirection. The Edge 40 Neo likely benefits from Motorola’s image processing algorithms, potentially offering more refined image quality, especially in challenging lighting conditions. The absence of OIS information for either device is a notable omission.
Performance
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo holds a slight advantage in processing power thanks to its MediaTek Dimensity 7030 chipset, featuring a 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 core configuration. This contrasts with the Tecno Pova 6 Pro’s Dimensity 6080, which uses 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores. While both are 6nm chips, the A78 cores in the Edge 40 Neo generally offer better single-core performance, translating to snappier app launches and smoother multitasking. However, the Pova 6 Pro’s larger battery capacity may allow it to sustain peak performance for longer periods. RAM configurations aren't specified, but LPDDR5x support would be expected in this price bracket for both devices.
Battery Life
The Tecno Pova 6 Pro dominates in battery endurance, achieving an impressive 14:22 hours of active use. This significantly surpasses the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s 10:28 hours. While the Edge 40 Neo’s older endurance rating of 80 hours suggests good standby time, active use is a more relevant metric. The Pova 6 Pro’s 70W charging is also faster, reaching 50% charge in 20 minutes and 100% in 50 minutes, compared to the Edge 40 Neo’s 68W, which hits 50% in 15 minutes. The Pova 6 Pro also includes 10W reverse wired charging, a feature absent in the Edge 40 Neo.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Pova 6 Pro if you need exceptional battery life, prioritize fast charging, and frequently engage in extended gaming or video streaming sessions. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prefer a more balanced experience with a slightly more powerful processor, a potentially smoother software experience (depending on Motorola’s skin), and a design that leans towards premium aesthetics. The Edge 40 Neo is better suited for users who value responsiveness and a more polished overall feel.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 6080 in the Tecno Pova 6 Pro throttle under sustained gaming loads?
While the Dimensity 6080 is a capable chipset, its thermal performance will depend on Tecno’s cooling solution. The large battery capacity of the Pova 6 Pro *may* help mitigate throttling by providing a larger thermal mass, but extended gaming sessions could still result in some performance reduction. Independent thermal testing is needed for a definitive answer.
❓ Is the 68W charging on the Motorola Edge 40 Neo fast enough for quick top-ups throughout the day?
The 68W charging on the Edge 40 Neo is reasonably fast, reaching 50% charge in 15 minutes. However, given the shorter battery life of the device, users may find themselves relying on more frequent top-ups compared to the Tecno Pova 6 Pro.
❓ How does the software experience differ between the Tecno Pova 6 Pro and Motorola Edge 40 Neo?
Motorola is known for a relatively clean Android experience with minimal bloatware, while Tecno’s HiOS typically includes more pre-installed apps and customizations. User preference will heavily influence which software experience is preferred. Motorola also generally offers faster software updates.
