The Tecno Pova 6 Neo 5G aims to deliver 5G connectivity and a large display at an aggressive price point, while the OnePlus Nord 4 positions itself as a more refined mid-range experience with a focus on performance and fast charging. This comparison dissects the key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and rapid charging, the OnePlus Nord 4 is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 chipset and 100W charging significantly outperform the Tecno Pova 6 Neo 5G's Dimensity 6300 and 18W charging, justifying the price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, September 11 | 2024, July 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September 14 | Available. Released 2024, August 08 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, aluminum back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 165.4 x 76.8 x 7.8 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.31 in) | 162.6 x 75 x 8 mm (6.40 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192.3 (6.77 oz) | 199.5 g (7.05 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~263 ppi density) | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~450 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.74 inches, 109.7 cm2 (~90.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | Fluid AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 2150 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x1.9 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7675 Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 732 |
| OS | Android 14, HIOS 14.5 | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, OxygenOS 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), PDAF
Unspecified camera | 50 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | Dual-LED flash | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0 | 16 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 100W wired, PPS, 100% in 28 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Azure Sky, Midnight Shadow, Aurora Cloud | Obsidian Midnight, Mercurial Silver, Oasis Green |
| Models | - | CPH2663, CPH2661 |
| Price | About 140 EUR | € 410.27 / £ 423.17 |
| SAR | - | 1.18 W/kg (head) 1.06 W/kg (body) |
Tecno Pova 6 Neo 5G
- More affordable price point
- Potential for larger battery capacity (unconfirmed)
- 5G connectivity for budget users
- Significantly slower charging speed
- Less powerful chipset for demanding tasks
- Likely lower display quality
OnePlus Nord 4
- Faster Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 processor
- Ultra-fast 100W charging
- Brighter and higher-quality display
- Higher price tag
- May not have expandable storage (typical for OnePlus)
- Potentially less battery capacity than the Tecno (unconfirmed)
Display Comparison
The OnePlus Nord 4 boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1163 nits. This translates to superior visibility outdoors under direct sunlight compared to the Tecno Pova 6 Neo 5G, whose brightness is not specified but is likely lower given its price bracket. While panel technology isn't specified for either, the Nord 4's brightness suggests a higher-quality panel. Bezels are likely comparable, but the Nord 4's overall display experience will be more vibrant and readable.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs for the Tecno Pova 6 Neo 5G, a direct comparison is limited. However, the OnePlus Nord 4 is expected to have a more sophisticated camera system, likely featuring a larger main sensor and improved image processing algorithms. The Nord 4’s image processing will likely prioritize detail and dynamic range, while the Tecno Pova 6 Neo 5G will likely focus on affordability. We can assume the Nord 4 will offer better low-light performance and more consistent results across various shooting conditions.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus Nord 4’s Qualcomm SM7675 Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 (4nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Tecno Pova 6 Neo 5G’s MediaTek Dimensity 6300 (6nm). The Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 features a Cortex-X4 prime core clocked at 2.8 GHz, alongside Cortex-A720 performance cores, offering a significant leap in CPU and GPU performance. The 4nm process node also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing throttling during prolonged gaming or intensive tasks. The Dimensity 6300, while capable for everyday use, will struggle to match the Nord 4’s sustained performance. The Nord 4 likely utilizes faster LPDDR5x RAM, further enhancing responsiveness.
Battery Life
The OnePlus Nord 4 excels in battery charging, offering 100W wired charging with PPS, capable of a full charge in just 28 minutes. This is a massive advantage over the Tecno Pova 6 Neo 5G’s 18W charging. While the Pova 6 Neo 5G may have a larger battery capacity (not specified), the Nord 4’s significantly faster charging mitigates any capacity difference. The Nord 4 also boasts an impressive 14:41h active use score, indicating excellent battery life optimization alongside its fast charging capabilities.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Pova 6 Neo 5G if you need a budget-friendly 5G phone with a large display and aren't heavily reliant on demanding applications or extended gaming sessions. Buy the OnePlus Nord 4 if you prioritize a smoother user experience, faster charging speeds, and better long-term performance, even if it means a higher upfront cost.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Dimensity 6300 in the Tecno Pova 6 Neo 5G sufficient for playing games like Call of Duty: Mobile?
The Dimensity 6300 can handle Call of Duty: Mobile, but you'll likely need to lower graphics settings for a smooth experience. The Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 in the OnePlus Nord 4 will provide a significantly more consistent and higher-fidelity gaming experience without requiring compromises.
❓ How much faster is the 100W charging on the OnePlus Nord 4 compared to the 18W charging on the Tecno Pova 6 Neo 5G in real-world use?
The 100W charging on the Nord 4 can fully charge the phone in approximately 28 minutes, while the 18W charging on the Pova 6 Neo 5G will likely take well over 2 hours. This means you can quickly top up your Nord 4 during short breaks, whereas the Pova 6 Neo 5G requires overnight charging for a full refill.
❓ Does the OnePlus Nord 4 support software updates for an extended period?
OnePlus generally provides good software support, typically offering 3 years of Android OS updates and 4 years of security patches for their Nord series. Tecno's software support track record is less consistent, so the Nord 4 is the safer bet for long-term software updates.
