The Tecno Pova 5G and Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range 5G smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a connected experience without breaking the bank, they take distinctly different approaches. The Pova 5G prioritizes processing power with its Dimensity 900, while the Poco X4 Pro 5G focuses on rapid charging and sustained usability.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and responsiveness, the Tecno Pova 5G is the better choice thanks to its more powerful Dimensity 900 chipset. However, the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G wins for those who value incredibly fast charging and all-day battery life, making it ideal for heavy users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Global |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, December 27 | 2022, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 27 | Available. Released 2022, March 23 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 172.8 x 78.2 x 9.1 mm (6.80 x 3.08 x 0.36 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~389 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.9 inches, 113.1 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, HIOS 8.0 | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, (wide), PDAF
2 MP
Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF - Global version
64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF - India version
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | Yes | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 70% in 22 min, 100% in 41 min |
| Type | 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Aether Black | Laser Black, Laser Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | LE8 | 2201116PG |
| Price | About 270 EUR | € 160.40 / $ 419.99 / £ 255.00 / ₹ 12,940 |
| SAR | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.8 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 335353 (v8), 384646 (v9)
GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Tecno Pova 5G
- Faster processor for smoother performance
- More powerful CPU architecture (Cortex-A78)
- Potentially better for gaming and demanding apps
- Significantly slower charging speed (18W)
- Limited battery charging technology support
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G
- Blazing-fast 67W charging with PD3.0/QC3
- Excellent battery endurance (119h)
- Quick top-up times for convenience
- Less powerful processor compared to the Pova 5G
- CPU architecture is less efficient than Cortex-A78
Display Comparison
Both devices share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting typical IPS LCD characteristics. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness, color gamut coverage, and refresh rate are missing. Given the price bracket, we can assume both utilize 60Hz panels. The absence of LTPO technology suggests neither offers adaptive refresh rates for power saving. Bezels are likely comparable, typical of this segment.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details regarding sensor size, aperture, or OIS. The omission of these details suggests a focus on affordability over premium camera features. It’s safe to assume both rely on multi-camera systems with a primary sensor and supporting lenses, but without concrete specs, a detailed comparison is impossible. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is likely a marketing feature with limited real-world utility.
Performance
The Tecno Pova 5G’s Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6nm) boasts a CPU configuration of 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, offering a clear advantage over the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) with its 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold and 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver setup. The Cortex-A78 cores in the Dimensity 900 are architecturally superior, translating to faster single-core performance and better responsiveness. While both are 6nm chips, the Dimensity 900’s CPU clock speeds and core architecture give it an edge in CPU-intensive tasks. The Snapdragon 695 focuses on efficiency, potentially offering slightly better sustained performance under load, but the Pova 5G will likely excel in bursty workloads.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 119 hours, indicating similar overall battery life. However, the charging capabilities are drastically different. The Poco X4 Pro 5G’s 67W wired charging, supporting PD3.0 and QC3, is a game-changer, achieving 70% charge in 22 minutes and 100% in 41 minutes. The Tecno Pova 5G’s 18W charging is significantly slower, requiring considerably more time to fully replenish the battery. This difference in charging speed is a major advantage for the Poco X4 Pro 5G, especially for users who frequently need to top up their phones.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Pova 5G if you need a phone for demanding tasks like gaming or video editing, and appreciate a snappier user experience. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G if you prefer a phone that can be quickly topped up, offering peace of mind with its 67W charging and solid endurance, even if it means a slight performance trade-off.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Snapdragon 695 in the Poco X4 Pro 5G sufficient for playing demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
The Snapdragon 695 is capable of running PUBG and Call of Duty, but you'll likely need to lower graphics settings for a consistently smooth experience. It's not a gaming powerhouse, but it's adequate for casual gaming. The Tecno Pova 5G with its Dimensity 900 will offer a noticeably better gaming experience at higher settings.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Poco X4 Pro 5G compared to the 18W charging on the Tecno Pova 5G in real-world use?
The difference is substantial. The Poco X4 Pro 5G can go from 0% to 100% in approximately 41 minutes, while the Tecno Pova 5G will take well over two hours with its 18W charger. This means you can quickly top up the Poco X4 Pro 5G during a short break, something that's impractical with the Pova 5G.
❓ Does the Poco X4 Pro 5G support carrier aggregation for improved 5G speeds?
While the specifications don't explicitly state carrier aggregation support, the Snapdragon 695 typically supports it. This means the Poco X4 Pro 5G can potentially combine multiple 5G channels for faster download and upload speeds, depending on your carrier's network configuration.
