The Tecno Pova 4 and Realme 10 Pro+ represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive budget smartphone space. While both aim to deliver a strong user experience, they take different approaches. The Pova 4 focuses on maximizing value with a capable processor, while the 10 Pro+ prioritizes faster charging and a potentially more refined experience. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing fast charging and a smoother overall experience, the Realme 10 Pro+ is the better choice. Its Dimensity 1080 chipset and 67W charging significantly outperform the Pova 4’s Helio G99 and 18W charging, justifying the price difference for those who value convenience and speed.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA2000 1x |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, October 10 | 2022, November 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, October 10 | Available. Released 2022, November 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 170.6 x 77.5 x 8.7 mm (6.72 x 3.05 x 0.34 in) | 161.5 x 73.9 x 7.8 mm or 8 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 214 g (7.55 oz) | 173 g / 175 g (6.10 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~257 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.82 inches, 112.3 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | AMOLED, 1B colors, HDR10+, 120Hz, 800 nits |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6877V Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 12, HIOS 12 | Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, (wide), PDAF
0.08 MP, (depth) | - |
| Features | Dual LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide) |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | Panorama |
| Single | 8 MP | 16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS (L1+L5), GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 17 min (advertised) |
| Type | 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Cryolite Blue, Uranolith Grey | Dark Matter Black, Nebula Blue, Hyperspace |
| Models | LG7n | RMX3687, RMX3686 |
| Price | - | $ 269.00 / ₹ 22,999 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 149h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.4 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 522376 (v9)
GeekBench: 2371 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 23fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Tecno Pova 4
- More affordable price point
- Capable Helio G99 processor for gaming
- Potentially longer battery life due to less power-hungry components (speculation)
- Significantly slower 18W charging
- Less powerful processor compared to the Dimensity 1080
- Limited display information
Realme 10 Pro+
- 67W fast charging with PD3.0
- More powerful Dimensity 1080 processor
- Likely superior display quality (AMOLED)
- Higher price tag
- Potentially shorter battery life due to more powerful processor
- Camera details are limited
Display Comparison
The Realme 10 Pro+ boasts an unspecified 'Infinite' contrast ratio, suggesting a typical AMOLED panel with deep blacks. While the Pova 4’s display specifications are absent, Realme’s panel likely offers superior color accuracy and viewing angles. The lack of detailed display specs for the Pova 4 makes a direct comparison difficult, but the 10 Pro+ likely has an edge in visual quality. The Realme's display is also likely to have a higher peak brightness, improving visibility in direct sunlight.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for either device beyond 'Photo/Video', a precise comparison is challenging. However, the Realme 10 Pro+ is likely to feature a more sophisticated camera system, potentially including Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) – a feature often found in phones at this price point. The Pova 4’s camera is likely to be more basic, focusing on providing acceptable image quality in good lighting conditions. The absence of sensor size information makes it difficult to assess low-light performance, but Realme’s brand reputation suggests a more refined image processing pipeline.
Performance
The Realme 10 Pro+’s Dimensity 1080 (6nm) represents a significant step up in processing power compared to the Tecno Pova 4’s Helio G99 (6nm). The Dimensity 1080 utilizes two Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.6 GHz, offering superior single-core performance for app launches and responsiveness, versus the Pova 4’s Cortex-A76 cores at 2.2 GHz. While both chips are built on a 6nm process, the architectural improvements in the Dimensity 1080 translate to better overall performance and efficiency. The Realme 10 Pro+ will handle demanding games and multitasking with greater ease. The Pova 4 is still capable, but will show its limitations with graphically intensive titles.
Battery Life
The Realme 10 Pro+’s 67W wired charging with PD3.0 is a game-changer, advertised to deliver 50% charge in just 17 minutes. This is a massive advantage over the Tecno Pova 4’s slower 18W charging. While the Pova 4’s battery capacity is unspecified, the 10 Pro+’s 149-hour endurance rating suggests a well-optimized power management system. The faster charging of the Realme 10 Pro+ significantly reduces downtime, making it ideal for users who are constantly on the go.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Pova 4 if you need a reliable gaming phone on a strict budget and don't mind slower charging. Its Helio G99 provides sufficient power for most mobile games at medium settings. Buy the Realme 10 Pro+ if you prefer a more premium feel, significantly faster charging speeds, and a more powerful processor for demanding tasks and smoother multitasking.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 1080 in the Realme 10 Pro+ get hot during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 1080 is a relatively efficient chip built on a 6nm process. While some heat generation is inevitable during extended gaming, the 10 Pro+ likely incorporates thermal management solutions to prevent significant throttling. User reports will be crucial to confirm real-world thermal performance, but it's expected to handle demanding games without overheating excessively.
❓ Is the 18W charging on the Tecno Pova 4 slow enough to be a dealbreaker?
For users accustomed to fast charging, the 18W charging on the Pova 4 will feel noticeably slower. A full charge will take considerably longer than the Realme 10 Pro+'s 67W charging. If you frequently find yourself needing to top up your phone quickly, the Pova 4’s charging speed is a significant drawback.
❓ How does the Helio G99 perform in popular games like PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty Mobile?
The Helio G99 is capable of running PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty Mobile at medium settings with playable frame rates. However, you may need to lower graphics settings for smoother performance during intense firefights. The Dimensity 1080 in the Realme 10 Pro+ will provide a noticeably better gaming experience with higher frame rates and more consistent performance.
