The Tecno Pova 4 Pro and Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a strong feature set without breaking the bank, they take distinctly different approaches. The Pova 4 Pro focuses on maximizing value with a MediaTek Helio G99, while the Poco X5 Pro leverages the more powerful Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G. This comparison dives deep into the specifics to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 778G 5G chipset provides a noticeable performance advantage in demanding tasks and gaming, complemented by a brighter display and faster 67W charging. While the Tecno Pova 4 Pro offers a competitive price, the Poco X5 Pro delivers a more refined overall experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, October 10 | 2023, February 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, October 10 | Available. Released 2023, February 07 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.8 x 77 x 9.2 mm (6.49 x 3.03 x 0.36 in) | 162.9 x 76 x 7.9 mm (6.41 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~403 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.66 inches, 105.3 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 900 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 12, HIOS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, (wide), PDAF
0.08 MP, (depth) | - |
| Features | Dual LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.2 (Intl), 5.1 (India), A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band - India |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 45 min
5W reverse wired |
| Type | 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Fluorite Blue | Astral Black, Horizon Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | LG8n | 22101320G, 22101320I |
| Price | - | € 156.00 / $ 221.33 / ₹ 22,490 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 113h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-24.9 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 531398 (v9)
GeekBench: 2930 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Tecno Pova 4 Pro
- Potentially lower price point
- Competitive battery endurance
- 45W fast charging
- Less powerful chipset
- Likely lower display brightness
- Image processing may be less refined
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
- More powerful Snapdragon 778G 5G
- Brighter display (912 nits)
- Faster 67W charging with PD3.0/QC4
- Potentially higher price
- Battery life is comparable, not superior
- No specified water resistance
Display Comparison
The Poco X5 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 912 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Tecno Pova 4 Pro. This higher peak brightness translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both likely utilize IPS LCD panels (given the price bracket), the Poco’s superior brightness and infinite (nominal) contrast ratio suggest a more visually engaging experience. The absence of refresh rate information for the Pova 4 Pro is a drawback; the X5 Pro’s likely 120Hz panel (common in this segment) would offer smoother scrolling and animations.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but specifics are lacking. Without sensor size or aperture details, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Poco X5 Pro’s brand reputation suggests a more refined image processing pipeline. The Tecno Pova 4 Pro often prioritizes aggressive image sharpening, which can result in less natural-looking photos. The absence of details regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device suggests reliance on software stabilization, potentially limiting low-light video quality. We can assume both will include standard wide and macro lenses, but the Poco X5 Pro is more likely to deliver consistently better image quality across various conditions.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco X5 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm) features a more powerful CPU configuration – a 1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 prime core alongside 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55 efficiency cores – compared to the Tecno Pova 4 Pro’s MediaTek Helio G99 (6nm) with its 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 setup. The Snapdragon 778G’s architecture, particularly the inclusion of more performance-focused A78 cores, provides a clear advantage in CPU-intensive tasks and sustained performance. While both are 6nm chips, Qualcomm’s process optimization generally leads to better thermal efficiency. The Poco X5 Pro will likely exhibit less throttling during extended gaming sessions.
Battery Life
Both devices share an endurance rating of 113 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite the Tecno Pova 4 Pro’s unspecified battery capacity. However, the Poco X5 Pro’s 67W wired charging with PD3.0 and QC4 support is a significant advantage. It can reach 100% charge in just 45 minutes, while the Tecno Pova 4 Pro’s 45W charging will take considerably longer. The Poco X5 Pro also offers 5W reverse wired charging, a convenient feature for topping up accessories. The faster charging speed of the Poco X5 Pro mitigates any potential battery capacity difference.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Pova 4 Pro if you prioritize maximizing battery life and are primarily focused on everyday tasks like social media, browsing, and light gaming, and are on a very tight budget. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro if you demand smoother performance for gaming and multitasking, appreciate a brighter and more vibrant display, and value faster charging speeds, even if it means a slightly higher price point.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 778G in the Poco X5 Pro handle demanding games like Genshin Impact well?
Yes, the Snapdragon 778G is a capable chipset for gaming. While it won't deliver flagship-level performance, it can comfortably run Genshin Impact at medium settings with stable frame rates. The improved thermal management compared to the Helio G99 also means less throttling during extended gaming sessions.
❓ Is the 45W charging on the Tecno Pova 4 Pro slow compared to the Poco X5 Pro's 67W?
Yes, 45W is noticeably slower than 67W. The Poco X5 Pro can fully charge in approximately 45 minutes, while the Tecno Pova 4 Pro will likely take over an hour, potentially closer to 90 minutes depending on battery capacity. This difference is significant for users who prioritize quick top-ups.
❓ How does the image processing differ between the two phones, and which one produces more natural-looking photos?
Tecno phones often employ more aggressive image sharpening and saturation, resulting in photos that appear vibrant but can lack natural detail. Xiaomi's image processing tends to be more balanced, aiming for greater accuracy and realism. The Poco X5 Pro is therefore likely to produce more natural-looking photos, especially in challenging lighting conditions.
