The Tecno Pova series is known for delivering impressive features at incredibly competitive prices. The Pova 4 and Pova 4 Pro build upon this reputation, but with key differences. This comprehensive comparison will help you decide which phone is the right fit for your budget and needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Tecno Pova 4 Pro emerges as the clear winner thanks to its significantly faster 45W charging. Both phones share the same powerful Helio G99 chipset, but the Pro's charging speed makes it a more practical choice for users who value quick top-ups. The Pova 4 remains a solid option if charging speed isn't a priority.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, October 10 | 2022, October 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, October 10 | Available. Released 2022, October 10 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.8 x 77 x 9.2 mm (6.49 x 3.03 x 0.36 in) | 170.6 x 77.5 x 8.7 mm (6.72 x 3.05 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 214 g (7.55 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~403 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~257 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.66 inches, 105.3 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.82 inches, 112.3 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 12, HIOS | Android 12, HIOS 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, (wide), PDAF
0.08 MP, (depth) | 50 MP, (wide), PDAF
0.08 MP, (depth) |
| Features | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Single | 50 MP, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Yes |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | 6000 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Fluorite Blue | Cryolite Blue, Uranolith Grey |
| Models | LG8n | LG7n |
Tecno Pova 4 Pro
- Faster 45W Charging
- Potentially better camera system
- Possible improved thermal management
- Large 6000mAh battery
- Slightly higher price
- LCD display (not AMOLED)
Tecno Pova 4
- More affordable
- Large 6000mAh battery
- 120Hz display
- Smooth performance with Helio G99
- Slow 18W charging
- Less versatile camera system
- LCD display (not AMOLED)
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.8-inch FHD+ display with a 120Hz refresh rate, offering a smooth and immersive viewing experience. While both are LCD panels, they provide vibrant colors and decent brightness for the price point. There's likely a slight difference in color accuracy, but it's unlikely to be noticeable for most users.
Camera Comparison
The Pova 4 Pro generally boasts a more versatile camera system. While both have a 50MP main sensor, the Pro often includes additional lenses like a macro and depth sensor, offering more creative options. Image processing and low-light performance are likely improved on the Pro, though both deliver acceptable results for their price range. Expect the Pro to have better video recording capabilities.
Performance
The core performance is virtually identical. Both devices utilize the Mediatek Helio G99 chipset, ensuring smooth multitasking, gaming, and app usage. However, the Pro model *might* have slightly better thermal management due to potential design tweaks, preventing throttling during extended gaming sessions. Software optimization could also play a role.
Battery Life
Both phones pack a large 6000mAh battery, promising all-day battery life. However, the charging speed is the key differentiator. The Pova 4 Pro's 45W charging can fully charge the battery in around an hour, while the Pova 4's 18W charging takes significantly longer (around 3-4 hours).
Buying Guide
The Tecno Pova 4 Pro is ideal for gamers and power users who want fast charging and a smooth experience. The Tecno Pova 4 is a great choice for budget-conscious users who prioritize value and don't need the fastest charging speeds. Both are excellent for media consumption and everyday tasks.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Tecno Pova 4 Pro worth the extra money?
If fast charging and a slightly better camera are important to you, then yes. The Pova 4 Pro offers a noticeable upgrade in charging speed and potentially camera quality.
❓ Which phone has better gaming performance?
Both phones offer good gaming performance thanks to the Helio G99 chipset. The Pova 4 Pro *might* have a slight edge due to potentially better thermal management, but it's unlikely to be a significant difference.
❓ What type of display do these phones have?
Both the Tecno Pova 4 and Pova 4 Pro use LCD panels. They are not AMOLED displays.