The Tecno Pova 4 Pro and Oppo Reno 10x Zoom represent different eras of smartphone design. The Pova 4 Pro is a modern budget gaming-focused device, while the Reno 10x Zoom, though older, was a flagship known for its innovative periscope zoom camera. This comparison dissects their strengths and weaknesses to determine which phone offers the best value in today's market.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user in 2024, the Tecno Pova 4 Pro emerges as the better choice. Its newer Mediatek Helio G99 chipset offers comparable, and in some cases superior, performance to the aging Snapdragon 855, coupled with faster 45W charging. While the Reno 10x Zoom boasts a legacy of camera innovation, the Pova 4 Pro delivers a more modern and efficient experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE |
| | - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, October 10 | 2019, April. Released 2019, June |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, October 10 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 164.8 x 77 x 9.2 mm (6.49 x 3.03 x 0.36 in) | 162 x 77.2 x 9.3 mm (6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~403 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~387 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.66 inches, 105.3 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 108.6 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz | AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 12, HIOS | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, ColorOS 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, (wide), PDAF
0.08 MP, (depth) | - |
| Features | Dual LED flash | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/3.0, 130mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF OIS, 5x optical zoom, 10x hybrid zoom
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide) |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS; video rec. only with main camera |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 8 MP | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.0, A2DP, EDR, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired | 20W wired |
| Type | 6000 mAh | Li-Po 4065 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Fluorite Blue | Ocean Green, Jet Black, Mist Pink, Ocean Blue |
| Models | LG8n | CPH1919, PCCM00 |
| Price | - | About 1020 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 107h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-24.7 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 364220 (v7), 407473 (v8)
GeekBench: 10395 (v4.4), 2103 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 35fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Tecno Pova 4 Pro
- Faster 45W Charging
- More Modern Chipset (Helio G99)
- Likely Lower Price Point
- Camera System Details Unknown
- May Lack Periscope Zoom
Oppo Reno 10x zoom
- Innovative 10x Hybrid Optical Zoom
- OLED Display with Good Contrast
- Established Camera Reputation
- Aging Snapdragon 855 Chipset
- Slower 20W Charging
- Older Software Support
Display Comparison
The Oppo Reno 10x Zoom’s display is rated at 440 nits of peak brightness, which, while adequate for its time, is likely to appear dimmer compared to modern displays. The Tecno Pova 4 Pro’s display specifications are not provided, but given its market segment, it likely prioritizes refresh rate over peak brightness. The Reno 10x Zoom’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio is a marketing term; however, its OLED panel inherently offers excellent contrast. The Reno 10x Zoom’s display technology was a key selling point, but the Pova 4 Pro likely offers a larger screen size for a more immersive experience.
Camera Comparison
The Oppo Reno 10x Zoom’s primary strength lies in its 10x hybrid optical zoom, a feature largely absent in the Tecno Pova 4 Pro. However, the Reno 10x Zoom’s image processing is dated, and its low-light performance may not match modern algorithms. The Pova 4 Pro’s camera specifications are not detailed, but it likely focuses on providing a versatile camera system for social media and everyday photography. The Reno 10x Zoom’s periscope lens offers a unique capability, but the Pova 4 Pro’s newer sensor and image processing could deliver more consistent results in most scenarios.
Performance
The Tecno Pova 4 Pro’s Mediatek Helio G99 (6nm) is a more efficient chipset than the Oppo Reno 10x Zoom’s Snapdragon 855 (7nm). While the Snapdragon 855 boasts a higher peak CPU clock speed (2.84 GHz Kryo 485 vs 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76), the G99’s newer architecture and smaller node size translate to better sustained performance and thermal management. The Snapdragon 855’s Kryo 485 cores are showing their age, and may struggle with demanding modern applications. The G99’s octa-core configuration (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) provides a balanced approach for both gaming and everyday tasks.
Battery Life
Both devices share an endurance rating of 107 hours, suggesting comparable battery life despite the Tecno Pova 4 Pro’s unspecified battery capacity. However, the Pova 4 Pro’s 45W wired charging is significantly faster than the Reno 10x Zoom’s 20W charging. This means the Pova 4 Pro can replenish its battery much quicker, reducing downtime. The Reno 10x Zoom’s battery life was impressive for its time, but the Pova 4 Pro’s faster charging offers a more convenient user experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Pova 4 Pro if you prioritize gaming performance, fast charging, and a modern feature set on a tight budget. It’s ideal for users who spend significant time playing mobile games or need a phone that can quickly replenish its battery. Buy the Oppo Reno 10x Zoom if you specifically need a periscope zoom camera for long-range photography and are willing to accept an older chipset and slower charging speeds. It caters to photography enthusiasts who value optical zoom capabilities.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 855 in the Oppo Reno 10x Zoom struggle with demanding games in 2024?
Yes, the Snapdragon 855, while powerful in its prime, is showing its age. Modern, graphically intensive games may experience frame drops or require reduced settings to maintain smooth gameplay. The Tecno Pova 4 Pro’s Helio G99 is designed for efficient gaming and will likely provide a more consistent experience.
❓ How does the 45W charging on the Tecno Pova 4 Pro compare to the 20W charging on the Oppo Reno 10x Zoom in real-world use?
The 45W charging on the Pova 4 Pro can significantly reduce charging times. Expect a full charge in approximately 60-90 minutes, compared to potentially over 2 hours for the Reno 10x Zoom. This is a substantial difference for users who need to quickly top up their battery.
❓ Is the 10x zoom on the Oppo Reno 10x Zoom still relevant compared to digital zoom on modern phones?
While digital zoom has improved, the optical elements in the Reno 10x Zoom’s periscope lens still provide superior image quality at high zoom levels. However, the convenience of software-based zoom and computational photography on the Pova 4 Pro may be preferable for casual users.
