The Tecno Pova 4 Pro and Motorola Edge 40 Neo represent compelling options in the competitive mid-range smartphone market. The Pova 4 Pro aggressively targets gamers with its focus on raw processing power, while the Edge 40 Neo prioritizes a balanced experience with a strong emphasis on battery life and a refined design. This comparison dives deep into their specifications to determine which device delivers the best value for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and a more polished user experience, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo is the better choice. Its Dimensity 7030 chipset offers a performance uplift over the Helio G99, coupled with significantly longer battery endurance and faster 68W charging. However, gamers on a tight budget will find the Pova 4 Pro’s aggressive pricing appealing.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, October 10 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, October 10 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.8 x 77 x 9.2 mm (6.49 x 3.03 x 0.36 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~403 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.66 inches, 105.3 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 12, HIOS | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, (wide), PDAF
0.08 MP, (depth) | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | Dual LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Fluorite Blue | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | LG8n | XT2307-1 |
| Price | - | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
Tecno Pova 4 Pro
- Aggressive pricing makes it very affordable.
- Helio G99 is capable for casual gaming.
- 45W fast charging is decent.
- Likely shorter battery life compared to the Edge 40 Neo.
- Less refined overall user experience.
- Display brightness likely lower.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Excellent battery life (10:28h active use).
- Faster 68W charging (50% in 15 min).
- Brighter and potentially more accurate display (1073 nits).
- Higher price point than the Tecno Pova 4 Pro.
- Dimensity 7030 may not offer a massive performance leap for basic tasks.
- Camera performance details are limited.
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1073 nits. This is crucial for outdoor visibility, a clear advantage over the Tecno Pova 4 Pro, whose peak brightness is not specified but is likely lower given its focus on cost reduction. While both utilize 6nm chipsets, the Edge 40 Neo’s brighter panel and potentially better color calibration (based on Motorola’s track record) contribute to a superior viewing experience. We expect the Edge 40 Neo to have a more vibrant and accurate display.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications are limited for both devices. However, given the market positioning, we can infer that the Motorola Edge 40 Neo likely prioritizes image quality with more sophisticated image processing algorithms. While both may feature a standard main sensor, the Edge 40 Neo’s focus on overall user experience suggests a more refined camera experience. The Pova 4 Pro may lean towards aggressive image sharpening to compensate for a potentially less capable sensor. We anticipate the Edge 40 Neo to deliver more natural-looking photos and better video stabilization.
Performance
Both phones utilize MediaTek chipsets fabricated on a 6nm process, but the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s Dimensity 7030 holds a clear advantage. Its CPU features 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores compared to the Pova 4 Pro’s 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores. The Cortex-A78 architecture is more efficient and delivers higher single-core performance, translating to snappier app launches and smoother multitasking. While both have 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 efficiency cores, the Dimensity 7030’s superior CPU and potentially more optimized GPU will result in better gaming performance and overall responsiveness. The Pova 4 Pro will be adequate for casual gaming, but the Edge 40 Neo will handle more demanding titles with higher frame rates.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo shines in battery performance. Its endurance rating of 80 hours and active use score of 10:28h significantly surpasses what we’d expect from the Tecno Pova 4 Pro, which lacks published battery life data. The Edge 40 Neo’s 68W wired charging is also a major advantage, promising a 50% charge in just 15 minutes. The Pova 4 Pro’s 45W charging is respectable, but slower. The Edge 40 Neo’s combination of efficient chipset and optimized software allows it to deliver all-day battery life even with moderate to heavy use, while the Pova 4 Pro may require a mid-day top-up for power users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Pova 4 Pro if you need a phone primarily for mobile gaming and demand the lowest possible price for a decent gaming experience. You’ll need to accept compromises in battery life and overall refinement. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prefer a more balanced smartphone experience with excellent battery life, faster charging, a brighter display, and a more premium feel, even if it means spending a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the MediaTek Dimensity 7030 in the Motorola Edge 40 Neo get hot during extended gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 7030 is a 6nm chipset, which generally offers good thermal efficiency. Motorola’s software optimization and the phone’s design likely include thermal management features to prevent excessive overheating. While some heat is inevitable during prolonged gaming, the Edge 40 Neo should maintain stable performance without significant throttling.
❓ Is the 45W charging on the Tecno Pova 4 Pro fast enough for daily use?
45W charging is respectable and will provide a reasonable charging speed. However, it’s considerably slower than the 68W charging on the Motorola Edge 40 Neo. If you frequently find yourself needing to quickly top up your battery, the Edge 40 Neo’s faster charging will be a significant convenience.
❓ How does the Helio G99 handle graphically demanding games like Genshin Impact or Call of Duty Mobile?
The Helio G99 can run these games, but you’ll likely need to lower the graphics settings to achieve a smooth frame rate. Expect medium settings to be the sweet spot for a playable experience. The Dimensity 7030 in the Edge 40 Neo will offer a noticeably smoother experience at higher settings.
❓ What type of display technology does the Motorola Edge 40 Neo use, and does it support high refresh rates?
While the exact display technology isn't specified, Motorola typically uses pOLED panels in this price range, offering excellent color accuracy and contrast. The Edge 40 Neo supports a 144Hz refresh rate, providing a fluid and responsive visual experience, especially noticeable during scrolling and gaming.
