The Tecno Pova 3 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive sub-$300 smartphone market. While both aim to deliver 5G connectivity and a feature-rich experience, they diverge significantly in their core hardware choices, particularly in chipset and charging technology. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device offers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing fast charging and a more efficient processor, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) is the better choice. Its 67W charging significantly outperforms the Pova 3’s 33W, and the Snapdragon 695 offers a more refined experience despite similar CPU clock speeds.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE-A (CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 25 | 2022, March 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 25 | Available. Released 2022, March 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 173.1 x 78.5 x 9.4 mm (6.81 x 3.09 x 0.37 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 230 g (8.11 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | RGB notification light stripe on the back (Electric Blue model only) | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~389 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.9 inches, 113.1 cm2 (~83.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769H Helio G88 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, HIOS | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lenses | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, (wide), PDAF
0.08 MP, (depth)
0.08 MP | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0 | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired
10W reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 42 min (advertised) |
| Type | 7000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Electric Blue, Tech Silver, Eco Black | Mirage Blue, Phantom White, Stealth Black |
| Models | LF7n | 2201116SI |
| Price | About 150 EUR | About 250 EUR |
Tecno Pova 3
- Potentially larger battery capacity (unconfirmed)
- More affordable price point (likely)
- Reverse wired charging for accessory top-ups
- Less efficient Helio G88 chipset
- Slower 33W charging
- Inferior ISP for image processing
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India)
- Faster 67W charging with PD3.0/QC3
- More efficient Snapdragon 695 chipset
- Superior ISP for better image quality
- Potentially smaller battery capacity (unconfirmed)
- Higher price point (likely)
- May lack reverse wired charging
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. While specific panel details (like peak brightness or color gamut coverage) are absent, the focus here is on the underlying processing power impacting UI smoothness. Both likely utilize IPS LCD panels, common in this price bracket. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G benefits from the Snapdragon 695’s superior image signal processor (ISP), potentially leading to slightly better image quality from the display, but this is a secondary effect.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs beyond the main sensors, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Snapdragon 695’s superior ISP in the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G will likely result in better image processing, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The ISP handles noise reduction, dynamic range, and color accuracy. While the Pova 3 may offer a comparable megapixel count, the image quality will likely be inferior due to the less capable image signal processing. We can assume both phones will include standard features like portrait mode and night mode, but the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G will likely execute these features more effectively.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (6nm) has a clear architectural advantage over the Tecno Pova 3’s MediaTek Helio G88 (12nm). The 6nm process node translates to significantly improved power efficiency, meaning less heat generation and potentially less performance throttling during sustained workloads. While both CPUs feature a 2x high-performance core and 6x efficiency core configuration, the Snapdragon’s Kryo 660 Gold cores (2.2 GHz) are clocked higher than the Helio G88’s Cortex-A75 cores (2.0 GHz). This, combined with the more modern architecture, gives the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G an edge in both single-core and multi-core performance. The Snapdragon 695 also includes an integrated 5G modem, while the Pova 3 relies on a separate modem, potentially impacting efficiency.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G’s 67W charging is a game-changer. Advertised figures claim a 0-100% charge in just 42 minutes, a substantial improvement over the Tecno Pova 3’s 33W charging. This difference is critical for users who value convenience and minimal downtime. While the Pova 3 may have a slightly larger battery capacity (spec not provided), the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G’s more efficient Snapdragon 695 chipset will likely offset any capacity difference, resulting in comparable real-world battery life. The inclusion of PD3.0 and QC3 support on the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G further enhances its charging versatility.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Pova 3 if you prioritize maximizing battery life and are less concerned with peak performance or rapid charging. It’s a solid option for users who primarily engage in casual tasks and media consumption. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) if you value faster charging speeds, a more power-efficient processor, and a generally smoother user experience, even if it means slightly less battery longevity.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 695 in the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 695 is known for its relatively good thermal efficiency thanks to its 6nm process. While it won't match the cooling performance of flagship chips, it's unlikely to overheat significantly during typical gaming sessions. However, sustained, high-graphics gaming will still generate heat, and performance may be throttled slightly to maintain safe operating temperatures.
❓ Is the 33W charging on the Tecno Pova 3 slow compared to the competition?
Yes, 33W charging is considerably slower than the 67W charging offered by the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G. While 33W is still faster than standard charging, it will take significantly longer to fully charge the device, potentially adding an hour or more to the charging time.
❓ Will the Helio G88 in the Tecno Pova 3 struggle with demanding apps or multitasking?
The Helio G88 is a capable chipset for everyday tasks, but it may exhibit some lag or slowdown when running multiple demanding apps simultaneously or when handling graphically intensive games. It's best suited for casual users who don't push their phones to the limit.
