The Tecno Pova series is known for offering impressive features at budget-friendly prices. The Pova 3 and Pova Neo 2 are two contenders vying for your attention. But which one delivers the best value? Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Tecno Pova 3 edges out the Pova Neo 2 thanks to its faster charging and reverse charging capabilities. While both offer similar performance, the Pova 3's added features and slightly better overall package make it the preferred choice for most users seeking a budget gaming phone.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 25 | 2022, September 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 25 | Available. Released 2022, October 03 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 173.1 x 78.5 x 9.4 mm (6.81 x 3.09 x 0.37 in) | 170.9 x 77.8 x 9.6 mm (6.73 x 3.06 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 230 g (8.11 oz) | - |
| | RGB notification light stripe on the back (Electric Blue model only) | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~389 ppi density) | 720 x 1640 pixels (~263 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.9 inches, 113.1 cm2 (~83.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.82 inches, 110.5 cm2 (~83.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769H Helio G88 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11, HIOS | Android 12, HIOS 8.6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 16 MP, (wide), AF
Secondary unknown camera |
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lenses | 8 MP |
| Triple | 50 MP, (wide), PDAF
0.08 MP, (depth)
0.08 MP | - |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0 | 8 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (LG6n only) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Yes |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired
10W reverse wired | 18W wired |
| Type | 7000 mAh | 7000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Electric Blue, Tech Silver, Eco Black | Uranolite Gray, Virtual Blue, Orange Magma |
| Models | LF7n | LG6n |
| Price | About 150 EUR | About 240 EUR |
Tecno Pova 3
- Faster 33W Charging
- Reverse Wired Charging
- Slightly Better Performance (Helio G88)
- Potentially Higher Resolution Main Camera
- May be slightly more expensive
- Design might be less appealing to some
Tecno Pova Neo 2
- More Affordable
- Large 6000mAh Battery
- Decent Performance for the Price
- Slower 18W Charging
- No Reverse Charging
- Slightly Weaker Processor (Helio G85)
- Lower Resolution Main Camera
Display Comparison
Both phones typically feature a large 6.8-inch display, likely with an LCD panel and a resolution around 1080 x 2400 pixels. Expect similar viewing experiences, though brightness and color accuracy might vary slightly. The Pova 3 may have a marginally higher refresh rate (90Hz vs 60Hz on the Neo 2), offering smoother scrolling and animations.
Camera Comparison
The Pova 3 typically boasts a higher resolution main camera (48MP vs 16MP on the Neo 2), potentially resulting in more detailed photos in good lighting conditions. Both phones likely include ultrawide and macro lenses. Video recording capabilities are likely similar, with both supporting 1080p at 30fps. Image processing and software features will differentiate the final image quality.
Performance
Both devices are powered by MediaTek Helio processors. The Pova 3 uses the Helio G88, while the Pova Neo 2 utilizes the Helio G85. While both are octa-core chips, the G88 generally offers a slight performance advantage in gaming and multitasking. However, real-world differences are likely to be minimal for casual users.
Battery Life
Both phones pack a large 6000mAh battery, promising excellent battery life. However, the Pova 3 has a significant advantage with its 33W wired charging compared to the Pova Neo 2's 18W charging. The Pova 3 also includes reverse wired charging, allowing it to charge other devices.
Buying Guide
The Tecno Pova 3 is ideal for users who prioritize fast charging, reverse charging, and slightly better overall features. The Tecno Pova Neo 2 is a great option for those looking for a more affordable device with similar performance, especially if charging speed isn't a major concern.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Tecno Pova 3 worth the extra money?
If fast charging and reverse charging are important to you, then yes. The Pova 3 offers a noticeable improvement in charging speed and added functionality.
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Tecno Pova 3 has a slight edge due to the Helio G88 processor, but both phones should handle most games reasonably well at medium settings.
