The Tecno Pova 3 and Realme 10 Pro+ represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The Pova 3 focuses on delivering a gaming-centric experience at an aggressive price point, while the Realme 10 Pro+ aims for a more balanced package with a focus on fast charging and a refined design. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Realme 10 Pro+ is the superior choice. Its Dimensity 1080 chipset provides a substantial performance uplift over the Pova 3’s Helio G88, and the 67W charging dramatically reduces downtime. While the Pova 3 offers a compelling value proposition for budget gamers, the 10 Pro+ delivers a more polished and versatile experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA2000 1x |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 25 | 2022, November 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 25 | Available. Released 2022, November 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 173.1 x 78.5 x 9.4 mm (6.81 x 3.09 x 0.37 in) | 161.5 x 73.9 x 7.8 mm or 8 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 230 g (8.11 oz) | 173 g / 175 g (6.10 oz) |
| | RGB notification light stripe on the back (Electric Blue model only) | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~389 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.9 inches, 113.1 cm2 (~83.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | AMOLED, 1B colors, HDR10+, 120Hz, 800 nits |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769H Helio G88 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6877V Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 11, HIOS | Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lenses | 16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide) |
| Triple | 50 MP, (wide), PDAF
0.08 MP, (depth)
0.08 MP | 108 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | Panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0 | 16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired
10W reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 17 min (advertised) |
| Type | 7000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Electric Blue, Tech Silver, Eco Black | Dark Matter Black, Nebula Blue, Hyperspace |
| Models | LF7n | RMX3687, RMX3686 |
| Price | About 150 EUR | $ 269.00 / ₹ 22,999 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 149h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.4 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 522376 (v9)
GeekBench: 2371 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 23fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Tecno Pova 3
- Aggressive pricing makes it accessible.
- 33W charging is decent for the price range.
- 10W reverse charging offers accessory top-ups.
- Helio G88 chipset is significantly less powerful.
- Limited information on display quality.
Realme 10 Pro+
- Dimensity 1080 offers superior performance.
- 67W fast charging drastically reduces downtime.
- Likely better display quality and color accuracy.
- Higher price point than the Tecno Pova 3.
- No reverse wireless charging.
Display Comparison
The Realme 10 Pro+ boasts an unspecified display contrast ratio described as 'Infinite (nominal)', suggesting a high-quality panel. While the Pova 3’s display specifications are absent, Realme’s marketing emphasizes visual clarity. The Realme’s likely higher manufacturing cost suggests better color accuracy and potentially higher peak brightness. The absence of detailed display specs for the Pova 3 indicates a more cost-optimized approach, potentially sacrificing some visual fidelity.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications are limited for both devices. However, the Realme 10 Pro+’s marketing focuses on its camera capabilities, suggesting a more sophisticated imaging system. While both phones likely feature multiple rear cameras, the Realme’s emphasis on photo and video quality implies a larger primary sensor and more advanced image processing algorithms. The Pova 3, geared towards gaming, likely prioritizes cost savings in the camera department. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on many phones in this segment is unlikely to provide significant photographic value on either device.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme 10 Pro+ utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6nm), featuring 2x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This 6nm process node is significantly more efficient than the 12nm process used in the Tecno Pova 3’s Helio G88. The G88’s CPU configuration of 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, while adequate for basic tasks, will struggle to match the Dimensity 1080 in demanding applications and sustained workloads. The Dimensity 1080’s superior architecture translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive gaming experience. The Realme 10 Pro+ will likely handle graphically intensive games at higher settings with fewer frame drops.
Battery Life
The Realme 10 Pro+’s 67W wired charging with PD3.0 support is a major advantage, advertised to deliver 50% charge in just 17 minutes. The Tecno Pova 3’s 33W charging is considerably slower. While battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the Realme’s faster charging mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery. The 10W reverse wired charging on the Pova 3 is a niche feature, useful for topping up accessories, but the Realme doesn’t offer this functionality. The Realme 10 Pro+’s endurance rating of 149 hours suggests optimized power management alongside its charging capabilities.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Pova 3 if you prioritize maximizing gaming performance on a strict budget and don't mind compromises in charging speed or overall refinement. Buy the Realme 10 Pro+ if you value faster charging, a more powerful processor for everyday tasks and light gaming, and a generally more premium user experience, even if it comes at a slightly higher cost.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Dimensity 1080 in the Realme 10 Pro+ prone to overheating during extended gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 1080’s 6nm process node is more efficient than the Helio G88’s 12nm node, meaning it generates less heat under load. While sustained gaming will inevitably cause some heat buildup, the 10 Pro+ is less likely to experience significant thermal throttling compared to the Pova 3.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Realme 10 Pro+ compared to the 33W charging on the Tecno Pova 3 in real-world use?
The 67W charging on the Realme 10 Pro+ can realistically charge from 0-100% in around 45-50 minutes, while the 33W charging on the Pova 3 will likely take over 1.5-2 hours. This difference is substantial and significantly reduces downtime for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
❓ Will the Tecno Pova 3 run demanding games like Genshin Impact or Call of Duty Mobile smoothly?
The Helio G88 in the Pova 3 can run these games, but you’ll likely need to lower the graphics settings to medium or low to achieve a playable frame rate. Expect occasional frame drops during intense scenes. The Realme 10 Pro+ with its Dimensity 1080 will provide a much smoother and more consistent gaming experience at higher settings.
