The Tecno Pova 2 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China variant) represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The Pova 2 prioritizes affordability and gaming-focused features, while the Redmi Note 10 Pro aims for a more balanced experience with a significantly more powerful chipset and faster charging. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing overall performance and convenience, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 1100 chipset delivers a substantial performance leap over the Pova 2’s Helio G85, coupled with blazing-fast 67W charging. However, the Pova 2 remains a compelling option for budget-conscious gamers.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, June 03 | 2021, May 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 11 | Available. Released 2021, June 02 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 173.3 x 78.8 x 9.6 mm (6.82 x 3.10 x 0.38 in) | 163.3 x 75.9 x 8.9 mm (6.43 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~389 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~399 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.9 inches, 113.1 cm2 (~82.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 480 nits | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, HIOS 7.6 | Android 11, MIUI 12.5 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.9, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lenses | - |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0 | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps, HDR |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio
Tuned by JBL |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | 7000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Polar Silver, Power Blue, Dazzle Black | Stargaze Black, Wave Blue, Cloud White |
| Models | LE7, LE7n | - |
| Price | About 140 EUR | About 200 EUR |
Tecno Pova 2
- More affordable price point
- Potentially larger battery capacity
- Focus on gaming-centric features (likely)
- Significantly weaker processor
- Slower charging speed
- Less future-proof
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China)
- Much faster processor (Dimensity 1100)
- Ultra-fast 67W charging
- Superior multitasking and gaming performance
- Likely higher price
- Potentially smaller battery capacity
- May run slightly warmer under heavy load
Display Comparison
While both phones likely feature LCD panels (data unavailable for Pova 2), the core difference lies in the processing power driving them. The Redmi Note 10 Pro’s Dimensity 1100 will handle graphically intensive games and UI animations with greater fluidity. We expect the Redmi Note 10 Pro to have a higher peak brightness, contributing to better outdoor visibility, though specific nit values are unavailable. Bezels are likely comparable given the market segment, and color accuracy will depend on software calibration.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, it’s difficult to make a definitive comparison. However, the Redmi Note 10 Pro’s chipset has a more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor) capable of handling more complex image processing algorithms. This likely translates to better dynamic range, noise reduction, and overall image quality. The Pova 2 will likely rely more on software processing to compensate for a potentially less capable sensor. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the Redmi Note 10 Pro (common in this series) would further enhance image and video quality, particularly in low-light conditions.
Performance
The performance gap is the most significant differentiator. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6nm) boasts a powerful octa-core configuration with 4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, offering a substantial advantage over the Tecno Pova 2’s Mediatek Helio G85 (12nm) and its 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores. The Dimensity 1100’s more advanced architecture and smaller node size translate to significantly faster processing speeds and improved power efficiency. This means smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a more enjoyable gaming experience on the Redmi Note 10 Pro. The Pova 2 will handle everyday tasks adequately, but will struggle with demanding games and applications.
Battery Life
The Tecno Pova 2 likely has a larger battery capacity (specific mAh unavailable) to compensate for the less efficient Helio G85 chipset. However, the Redmi Note 10 Pro’s 67W wired charging is a game-changer, capable of charging the phone from 0-100% in just 42 minutes. This drastically reduces downtime compared to the Pova 2’s 18W charging. While the Pova 2 may offer longer screen-on time, the convenience of the Redmi Note 10 Pro’s rapid charging is a significant advantage for many users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Pova 2 if you need a highly affordable gaming phone and don't mind compromises in processing power and charging speed. It's ideal for casual gamers and users who prioritize battery life over raw performance. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) if you prefer a smoother, more responsive experience for demanding apps, gaming, and multitasking, and value the convenience of incredibly fast charging. It’s the better choice for power users and those seeking a more future-proof device.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Dimensity 1100 in the Redmi Note 10 Pro prone to overheating during extended gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 1100 is a relatively efficient chipset, and Xiaomi typically implements effective thermal management solutions in their Redmi Note series. While some heat generation is inevitable during prolonged gaming, the Redmi Note 10 Pro is unlikely to experience significant throttling under normal usage conditions. The 6nm process node contributes to better thermal efficiency compared to the Pova 2’s 12nm Helio G85.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Redmi Note 10 Pro compared to the 18W charging on the Tecno Pova 2 in real-world use?
The 67W charging on the Redmi Note 10 Pro is dramatically faster. It can fully charge the phone in approximately 42 minutes, whereas the Pova 2’s 18W charging will likely take well over two hours. This difference is particularly noticeable for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
❓ Will the Helio G85 in the Tecno Pova 2 be sufficient for playing popular games like PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty Mobile?
The Helio G85 can run PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty Mobile, but you’ll likely need to lower the graphics settings to achieve a smooth frame rate. The experience won’t be as fluid or visually appealing as on the Redmi Note 10 Pro with its Dimensity 1100. Expect more noticeable frame drops and longer loading times.
