Tecno Pouvoir 4 vs. Nokia C300: A Deep Dive into Budget Smartphone Performance

The Tecno Pouvoir 4 and Nokia C300 represent two approaches to the ultra-budget smartphone market. The Pouvoir 4 aims for affordability with a Mediatek Helio A22, while the Nokia C300 leverages Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 662 for a potential performance boost. This comparison dissects the key differences to determine which device delivers the best value for users prioritizing everyday tasks and light multimedia consumption.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user, the Nokia C300 emerges as the better choice. Its Snapdragon 662 chipset, built on an 11nm process, provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Tecno Pouvoir 4’s Helio A22, translating to smoother multitasking and app loading. While the Pouvoir 4 may offer slightly longer battery life due to the less powerful chipset, the C300’s improved efficiency and user experience are worth the trade-off.

PHONES
Phone Names Tecno Pouvoir 4 Nokia C300
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 1700 / 1900
4G bands1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28LTE
SpeedHSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 MbpsHSPA, LTE
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE
Launch
Announced2020, July 07. Released 2020, July 232023, June 02
StatusDiscontinuedAvailable. Released 2023, June 14
Body
BuildGlass front, plastic back, plastic frameGlass front, plastic back, plastic frame
Dimensions174.9 x 79.6 x 9.2 mm (6.89 x 3.13 x 0.36 in)166.7 x 76.6 x 8.6 mm (6.56 x 3.02 x 0.34 in)
SIMDual SIMNano-SIM
Weight-190 g (6.70 oz)
Display
Protection-Scratch-resistant glass
Resolution720 x 1640 pixels (~256 ppi density)720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density)
Size7.0 inches, 116.4 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio)6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~80.4% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCD, 480 nits (typ)IPS LCD, 400 nits (typ)
Platform
CPUOcta-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver)
ChipsetMediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (12 nm)Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm)
GPUPowerVR GE8320Adreno 610
OSAndroid 10, HIOS 6.0Android 12
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (dedicated slot)microSDXC (dedicated slot)
Internal32GB 3GB RAM32GB 3GB RAM
 eMMC 5.1-
Main Camera
FeaturesQuad-LED flashLED flash, HDR, portrait, night
Quad13 MP, f/1.8, (wide), AF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lenses-
Triple-13 MP, (wide), AF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
FeaturesDual-LED flash-
Single8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide)8 MP
Video-Yes
Sound
3.5mm jack Yes-
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes
Comms
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, LE5.0, A2DP
NFCNoNo
PositioningGPSGPS
RadioFM radioFM radio
USBmicroUSB 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-bandWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band, hotspot
Features
SensorsFingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximityFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, barometer
Battery
Charging-10W wired
Type6000 mAhLi-Po 4000 mAh
Misc
ColorsCosmic Shine, Ice Jadeite, Fascinating PurpleBlue
ModelsLC7, LC7S-
Price-About 60 EUR

Tecno Pouvoir 4

  • Potentially longer battery life due to less powerful chipset.
  • Lower price point, making it accessible to budget-conscious buyers.
  • Simple and straightforward user experience.

  • Significantly slower performance compared to the Nokia C300.
  • Less responsive user interface and noticeable lag.
  • Limited multitasking capabilities.

Nokia C300

  • Faster and more responsive performance thanks to the Snapdragon 662.
  • Smoother multitasking and app loading times.
  • Better image processing capabilities for improved camera quality.

  • Slightly higher price compared to the Tecno Pouvoir 4.
  • 10W charging is relatively slow.
  • Battery life may be slightly shorter than the Pouvoir 4.

Display Comparison

Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, common in this price bracket. However, the core difference lies beneath the surface. The Nokia C300’s Snapdragon 662 has an integrated ISP capable of better image signal processing, potentially improving camera performance even with similar sensor specs (which are not provided). The absence of display specifications like resolution and refresh rate suggests both prioritize cost savings over visual fidelity.

Camera Comparison

Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Nokia C300 benefits from the Snapdragon 662’s superior image signal processor (ISP). This ISP can handle more complex image processing algorithms, potentially resulting in better dynamic range, noise reduction, and overall image quality. The Tecno Pouvoir 4’s Helio A22 has a less capable ISP, limiting its ability to enhance photos. It’s likely both phones feature basic camera setups, and the C300’s advantage will be most noticeable in challenging lighting conditions.

Performance

The performance gap is the most significant differentiator. The Nokia C300’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (11nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Tecno Pouvoir 4’s MediaTek Helio A22 (12nm). The Snapdragon 662 employs an octa-core configuration with Kryo 260 Gold and Silver cores, offering a more sophisticated architecture than the Pouvoir 4’s homogenous Cortex-A53 cores. This translates to faster app launch times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user interface on the C300. The 11nm process node also contributes to better power efficiency, mitigating some of the performance gains. While neither chipset is a gaming powerhouse, the C300 will handle casual games with significantly less stuttering.

Battery Life

The Tecno Pouvoir 4, powered by the less demanding Helio A22, likely offers slightly longer battery life on a single charge. However, the Nokia C300’s Snapdragon 662, built on an 11nm process, is more power-efficient than the 12nm Helio A22. The C300’s 10W wired charging is a standard offering in this segment, and while not fast, it provides a reliable way to replenish the battery. The Pouvoir 4’s charging speed is not specified, but is likely similar.

Buying Guide

Buy the Tecno Pouvoir 4 if you absolutely need the lowest possible price and your usage is limited to basic communication – calls, texts, and very light web browsing. Buy the Nokia C300 if you value a more responsive user experience, smoother app performance, and are willing to spend a little more for a phone that feels less sluggish during everyday tasks. The C300 is also a better choice for those who occasionally enjoy casual gaming.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Nokia C300 handle popular social media apps like Facebook and Instagram smoothly?
Yes, the Snapdragon 662 in the Nokia C300 is sufficiently powerful to run social media apps like Facebook and Instagram without significant lag. The improved CPU and GPU performance compared to the Tecno Pouvoir 4’s Helio A22 will result in a much smoother scrolling and app switching experience.
❓ Is the Snapdragon 662 in the Nokia C300 capable of playing any mobile games?
The Snapdragon 662 can handle casual mobile games like Candy Crush or Subway Surfers without issue. However, it’s not designed for demanding titles like PUBG or Call of Duty. You may be able to play these games on low settings, but expect some frame rate drops and stuttering. The Tecno Pouvoir 4 would struggle even more with these games.
❓ Does the Nokia C300 support software updates, and for how long?
Nokia is known for providing relatively good software support for its budget devices. The C300 is part of the Android One program, guaranteeing at least two years of security updates and one major OS upgrade. The Tecno Pouvoir 4’s software update policy is less clear, and updates are less frequent.
❓ What type of storage does the Nokia C300 use, and is it expandable?
While not explicitly stated, Nokia C300 typically uses eMMC storage in this price range. It also includes a dedicated microSD card slot for expandable storage, allowing you to add more space for photos, videos, and apps. The Tecno Pouvoir 4 likely has similar storage options.