Tecno Pouvoir 4 vs. Infinix Smart 5 Pro: A Deep Dive into Budget Smartphone Performance

The Tecno Pouvoir 4 and Infinix Smart 5 Pro represent the fiercely competitive sub-$100 smartphone market. Both aim to deliver essential functionality at an incredibly low price point, but they take different approaches to achieving this. The Pouvoir 4 leverages a Mediatek chipset, while the Smart 5 Pro opts for a Unisoc solution. This comparison dissects the key differences to determine which device offers the best value.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing basic tasks and extended battery life, the Tecno Pouvoir 4 emerges as the slightly better choice. Its Mediatek Helio A22, despite being a 12nm process, offers a more consistent performance profile than the Unisoc SC9863A, which struggles with sustained workloads due to its larger 28nm node.

PHONES
Phone Names Tecno Pouvoir 4 Infinix Smart 5 Pro
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100
4G bands1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 281, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41
SpeedHSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 MbpsHSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE
 -1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 40, 66
Launch
Announced2020, July 07. Released 2020, July 232021, November 17
StatusDiscontinuedAvailable. Released 2021, November 17
Body
BuildGlass front, plastic back, plastic frameGlass front, plastic back, plastic frame
Dimensions174.9 x 79.6 x 9.2 mm (6.89 x 3.13 x 0.36 in)164.4 x 75.6 x 9.5 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.37 in)
SIMDual SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight--
Display
Resolution720 x 1640 pixels (~256 ppi density)720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density)
Size7.0 inches, 116.4 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio)6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~82.6% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCD, 480 nits (typ)IPS LCD, 500 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetMediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (12 nm)Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm)
GPUPowerVR GE8320IMG8322
OSAndroid 10, HIOS 6.0Android 11 (Go edition), XOS 7.6
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (dedicated slot)microSDXC (dedicated slot)
Internal32GB 3GB RAM32GB 2GB RAM
 eMMC 5.1eMMC 5.1
Main Camera
Dual-13 MP, f/1.8, AF Auxiliary lens
FeaturesQuad-LED flashQuad-LED flash
Quad13 MP, f/1.8, (wide), AF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lenses-
Single-8 MP
Video1080p@30fps1440p@30fps
Selfie camera
FeaturesDual-LED flashDual-LED flash
Single8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide)8 MP
Video-1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes
Comms
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, LE4.2, A2DP
NFCNoNo
PositioningGPSGPS
RadioFM radioFM radio
USBmicroUSB 2.0microUSB 2.0
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-bandWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n
Features
SensorsFingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximityFingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity
Battery
Charging-10W wired
Type6000 mAh6000 mAh
Misc
ColorsCosmic Shine, Ice Jadeite, Fascinating PurpleMorandi Green, Heart of Ocean
ModelsLC7, LC7S-
Price-About 70 EUR

Tecno Pouvoir 4

  • More efficient chipset (12nm)
  • Potentially smoother UI experience
  • Better sustained performance

  • Likely lacks fast charging
  • Older chipset architecture

Infinix Smart 5 Pro

  • 10W wired charging support
  • Newer chipset (Unisoc SC9863A)
  • Potentially improved image processing

  • Less efficient chipset (28nm)
  • Potential for thermal throttling
  • Split CPU core configuration may lead to inconsistent performance

Display Comparison

Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely feature basic IPS LCD panels with resolutions around 720x1640. However, the absence of detailed display specs necessitates focusing on the chipset's impact on UI smoothness. The Pouvoir 4's Helio A22, while not a powerhouse, is generally better equipped to handle the UI rendering than the SC9863A, potentially resulting in fewer stutters during navigation.

Camera Comparison

Both phones likely feature basic camera setups, with the Infinix Smart 5 Pro potentially offering a slightly more refined image processing algorithm due to its newer chipset. However, without detailed sensor information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. The presence of a 2MP macro lens on either device is largely a marketing gimmick, offering minimal practical benefit due to the low resolution and lack of optical image stabilization. Expect similar image quality in good lighting conditions, with both struggling in low-light scenarios.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Tecno Pouvoir 4’s Mediatek Helio A22 (12nm) utilizes an octa-core Cortex-A53 CPU clocked at 2.0 GHz. The Infinix Smart 5 Pro’s Unisoc SC9863A (28nm) also features an octa-core CPU, but with a split configuration: four Cortex-A55 cores at 1.6 GHz and four at 1.2 GHz. The 28nm process of the Unisoc chip is significantly less efficient than the 12nm process of the Mediatek, meaning it will generate more heat and consume more power for the same workload. While the A55 cores are more efficient *per core* than the A53, the lower clock speeds and the process node disadvantage negate this benefit in real-world usage. This translates to potentially longer app loading times and less responsive multitasking on the Smart 5 Pro.

Battery Life

While both phones likely house batteries in the 4000-5000 mAh range (specs not provided), the Infinix Smart 5 Pro benefits from 10W wired charging, a feature likely absent on the Pouvoir 4. The Unisoc SC9863A’s lower efficiency, however, partially offsets this advantage. Users prioritizing longer screen-on time without frequent charging will likely find the Pouvoir 4’s more efficient chipset beneficial, even without fast charging.

Buying Guide

Buy the Tecno Pouvoir 4 if you need a phone for reliable everyday use – calls, messaging, social media, and light web browsing – and value a more predictable performance experience. Buy the Infinix Smart 5 Pro if you prioritize a slightly newer chipset and 10W charging, and are willing to accept potential performance dips during more demanding tasks. Both are suitable for first-time smartphone users or as a secondary device.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Unisoc SC9863A in the Infinix Smart 5 Pro overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Unisoc SC9863A's 28nm process is prone to generating more heat than the Mediatek Helio A22's 12nm process. While neither phone is designed for intensive gaming, the Smart 5 Pro is more likely to experience thermal throttling, leading to reduced performance and potentially a less enjoyable gaming experience.
❓ Is the difference in CPU architecture (Cortex-A53 vs. Cortex-A55) significant in real-world use between these two phones?
While Cortex-A55 cores are more efficient *per clock cycle* than Cortex-A53 cores, the lower clock speeds of the SC9863A and its less efficient 28nm process negate much of that advantage. The Helio A22's higher clock speed and more efficient manufacturing process result in a more consistently responsive experience for everyday tasks.
❓ How much faster is the 10W charging on the Infinix Smart 5 Pro compared to potentially no fast charging on the Tecno Pouvoir 4?
The 10W charging on the Smart 5 Pro will noticeably reduce charging times compared to standard 5W charging (likely on the Pouvoir 4). Expect a full charge to take around 3-4 hours with 10W, while the Pouvoir 4 could take upwards of 5-6 hours. This is a significant benefit for users who frequently need to top up their battery.