The Tecno Pouvoir 4 Pro and Samsung Galaxy A51 5G UW represent different approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The Pouvoir 4 Pro aims for affordability, while the A51 5G UW brings 5G connectivity and a more powerful processor to the table. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device offers the best value for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G UW is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 765G chipset delivers a significantly faster experience than the Tecno Pouvoir 4 Pro’s Helio P22, justifying the price difference. However, the Pouvoir 4 Pro remains a viable option for those on a very tight budget.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28 | 2, 4, 5, 13, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 260, 261 mmWave |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, July 07. Released 2020, July 23 | 2020, August 14 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, August 14 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 174.9 x 79.6 x 9.2 mm (6.89 x 3.13 x 0.36 in) | 158.8 x 73.4 x 8.6 mm (6.25 x 2.89 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM | Nano-SIM (pre-installed) |
| Weight | - | 188.8 g (6.67 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1640 pixels (~256 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 7.0 inches, 116.4 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ) | Super AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz & 4x1.5 GHz) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 10, HIOS 6.0 | Android 10, One UI 2 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 16 MP, f/1.9, (wide), AF
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lenses | 48 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide)
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 5 MP, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | - | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| | - | ANT+ |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 15W wired |
| Stand-by | - | Up to 672 h |
| Talk time | - | Up to 5 h |
| Type | 6000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Ice Jadeite, Misty Grey, Fascinating Purple | Prism Bricks Blue |
| Models | - | SM-A516V |
| Price | - | About 470 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.70 W/kg (head) 1.25 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.59 W/kg (head) 1.32 W/kg (body) |
Tecno Pouvoir 4 Pro
- Faster charging (18W vs 15W)
- Lower price point
- Potentially longer battery life due to less demanding chipset
- Significantly weaker performance
- Less future-proof
- Likely inferior camera quality
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G UW
- Much faster processor (Snapdragon 765G)
- 5G connectivity
- Better camera capabilities
- Slower charging (15W)
- Higher price
- Potentially lower battery life under heavy load
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a particularly standout display. While specific display specs (resolution, panel type) are missing for the Pouvoir 4 Pro, its market positioning suggests a lower-resolution panel. The A51 5G UW, while not featuring cutting-edge technology like LTPO, benefits from Samsung’s display expertise, likely offering better color accuracy and viewing angles. The absence of high refresh rates on both devices indicates a focus on battery conservation rather than visual fluidity.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the Tecno Pouvoir 4 Pro, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G UW likely offers a more refined camera experience. While the A51 5G UW’s main sensor size is unknown, Samsung’s image processing algorithms are generally well-regarded. The prevalence of low-resolution auxiliary cameras (often 2MP) in this price segment suggests the Pouvoir 4 Pro’s image quality may be limited, especially in low-light conditions. The A51 5G UW’s 5G capabilities also enable faster uploads of photos and videos.
Performance
The performance gap between these two phones is substantial. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G UW’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (7nm) is a far more advanced chipset than the Tecno Pouvoir 4 Pro’s MediaTek Helio P22 (12nm). The 7nm process node of the Snapdragon 765G translates to significantly improved power efficiency and thermal management, allowing for sustained performance during demanding tasks. The Snapdragon’s Kryo CPU architecture (1x2.4 GHz Prime, 1x2.2 GHz Gold, 6x1.8 GHz Silver) is also more sophisticated than the Helio P22’s simple octa-core configuration (4x2.0 GHz & 4x1.5 GHz). This difference is particularly noticeable in gaming and multitasking.
Battery Life
The Tecno Pouvoir 4 Pro’s 18W charging is faster than the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G UW’s 15W charging. However, battery life isn’t solely determined by charging speed. The Snapdragon 765G’s superior power efficiency means the A51 5G UW may offer comparable, or even better, real-world battery life despite potentially having a smaller battery capacity (specific capacity missing for both devices). The 3W difference in charging wattage will translate to a slightly faster 0-100% charge time on the Pouvoir 4 Pro, but the overall impact is moderate.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Pouvoir 4 Pro if you need a functional smartphone for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use, and your budget is extremely limited. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G UW if you prioritize smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, 5G connectivity, and a more capable camera system, even if it means spending more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Tecno Pouvoir 4 Pro struggle with modern mobile games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
Yes, the MediaTek Helio P22 is a relatively weak chipset and will likely struggle to run demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty at high settings. Expect low frame rates and potential stuttering, even on lower graphics settings. The A51 5G UW’s Snapdragon 765G is far better suited for gaming.
❓ Does the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G UW's 5G connectivity actually make a noticeable difference in everyday use?
The benefit of 5G depends heavily on your location and carrier coverage. If you live in an area with robust 5G infrastructure, you'll experience significantly faster download and upload speeds, especially for large files and streaming. However, if 5G coverage is limited, you may not see a substantial difference compared to 4G LTE.
❓ Is the difference in charging speed (18W vs 15W) between the Pouvoir 4 Pro and A51 5G UW significant?
While the Pouvoir 4 Pro charges slightly faster, the difference isn't dramatic. Expect a roughly 15-30 minute difference in a full charge, depending on battery capacity. The Snapdragon 765G's efficiency may offset this difference in real-world usage.
