The Tecno Pouvoir 4 Pro and Nokia 5.4 represent two distinct approaches to the budget smartphone market. The Pouvoir 4 Pro aims for value with a focus on fast charging, while the Nokia 5.4 prioritizes a cleaner software experience and a more modern chipset. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right phone for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Nokia 5.4 emerges as the better choice. Its Snapdragon 662 chipset, built on an 11nm process, delivers noticeably smoother performance and better long-term efficiency compared to the Tecno Pouvoir 4 Pro’s Helio P22. While the Pouvoir 4 Pro boasts faster 18W charging, the Nokia 5.4’s overall refinement and superior processing power make it the more compelling option.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 28, 66 - NA, LATAM |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, July 07. Released 2020, July 23 | 2020, December 15. Released 2020, December 25 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 174.9 x 79.6 x 9.2 mm (6.89 x 3.13 x 0.36 in) | 161 x 76 x 8.7 mm (6.34 x 2.99 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1640 pixels (~256 ppi density) | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 7.0 inches, 116.4 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.39 inches, 100.2 cm2 (~81.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 400 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz & 4x1.5 GHz) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 10, HIOS 6.0 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 16 MP, f/1.9, (wide), AF
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lenses | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
5 MP, 13mm (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | 6000 mAh | Li-Po 4000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Ice Jadeite, Misty Grey, Fascinating Purple | Polar Night, Dusk |
| Models | - | TA-1333, TA-1340, TA-1337, TA-1328, TA-1325 |
| Price | - | About 90 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.68 W/kg (head) 1.02 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
Tecno Pouvoir 4 Pro
- Faster 18W wired charging
- Potentially larger battery capacity (unconfirmed)
- Aggressive pricing for value-focused users
- Less powerful Helio P22 chipset
- Less efficient 12nm process
- Likely slower software updates
Nokia 5.4
- More powerful Snapdragon 662 chipset
- More efficient 11nm process
- Cleaner software experience (Nokia's Android One)
- Better long-term software support
- Slower 10W wired charging
- Potentially higher price point
- May lack some of the extra features found on Tecno devices
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely feature LCD panels, common in this price bracket. However, the lack of detailed display specs necessitates focusing on the chipset's impact on UI smoothness. The Nokia 5.4’s Snapdragon 662 will contribute to a more fluid scrolling experience, even if the resolution and panel type are similar. Bezels are likely comparable, given the market segment.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs beyond the presence of sensors, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Snapdragon 662’s image signal processor (ISP) is generally more capable than the Helio P22’s. This suggests the Nokia 5.4 will likely produce better-quality photos, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The presence of a dedicated ISP in the Snapdragon 662 allows for more sophisticated image processing, resulting in improved dynamic range and noise reduction. The Tecno Pouvoir 4 Pro may rely more heavily on software processing, which can sometimes lead to over-sharpening or unnatural colors.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Nokia 5.4’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (11nm) is a clear upgrade over the Tecno Pouvoir 4 Pro’s MediaTek Helio P22 (12nm). The smaller 11nm node translates to improved power efficiency and reduced heat generation, leading to sustained performance. While both CPUs feature octa-core configurations with similar peak clock speeds (2.0 GHz), the Snapdragon 662’s Kryo cores offer a more efficient architecture. This means the Nokia 5.4 will handle multitasking and demanding apps with greater ease, and is more likely to receive software updates for a longer period.
Battery Life
The Tecno Pouvoir 4 Pro’s 18W charging is its key advantage. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging will significantly reduce the time spent tethered to a wall outlet. The Nokia 5.4’s 10W charging is comparatively slow. However, the Snapdragon 662’s superior power efficiency means the Nokia 5.4 will likely deliver comparable, or even better, real-world battery life despite the slower charging speed. The 11nm process node contributes to lower power consumption during everyday use.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Pouvoir 4 Pro if you absolutely prioritize charging speed and need a phone that can quickly top up, even if it means sacrificing some performance. This phone suits users who frequently find themselves with limited access to power outlets. Buy the Nokia 5.4 if you value a smoother, more responsive user experience, a cleaner software interface, and better overall performance for everyday tasks and light gaming. This is the better choice for users who want a reliable and efficient daily driver.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Nokia 5.4 struggle with demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
While the Snapdragon 662 isn't a gaming powerhouse, it's capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium settings with reasonable frame rates. The efficient thermal management will prevent significant throttling during extended gaming sessions, unlike the Helio P22 which is more prone to overheating.
❓ How much faster is the charging on the Tecno Pouvoir 4 Pro in real-world use?
The 18W charging on the Pouvoir 4 Pro can potentially charge the phone from 0-100% in around 2-3 hours, depending on battery capacity. The Nokia 5.4’s 10W charging will likely take 4-5 hours for a full charge. This difference is significant for users who need a quick top-up before leaving the house.
❓ Does the Nokia 5.4's Android One software guarantee faster updates?
Android One guarantees at least two years of OS updates and three years of security patches. This is a significant advantage over Tecno, which typically offers less consistent and shorter-term software support. This ensures your Nokia 5.4 remains secure and up-to-date for a longer period.
❓ Is the difference in performance between the Helio P22 and Snapdragon 662 noticeable in everyday tasks?
Yes, the difference is quite noticeable. The Snapdragon 662 provides a smoother and more responsive experience when navigating the UI, opening apps, and multitasking. The Helio P22 can feel sluggish, especially when running multiple apps simultaneously.
