Both the Tecno Pouvoir 3 Plus and the Infinix Smart 4c target the ultra-budget smartphone market, but they approach it with slightly different hardware. The key distinction lies in their chipsets: the Tecno utilizes the Mediatek Helio P22, while the Infinix opts for the Helio A22. This comparison will dissect the implications of this core difference, and other factors, to determine which device offers the best value for users prioritizing affordability.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user needing a functional smartphone for basic tasks, the Tecno Pouvoir 3 Plus emerges as the better choice. Its Helio P22 chipset, featuring an octa-core CPU compared to the Smart 4c’s quad-core, provides a noticeable performance advantage in multitasking and app loading, justifying a potential slight price premium.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | 3, 7, 20 | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, August. Released 2019, August | 2019, November. Released 2019, December |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 159 x 76 x 9.2 mm (6.26 x 2.99 x 0.36 in) | 167 x 76 x 8.3 mm (6.57 x 2.99 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 183 g (6.46 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1548 pixels (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~266 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.35 inches, 99.5 cm2 (~82.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), HIOS 5.0 | Android 9.0 (Pie) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 8 MP
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash |
| Single | 32 MP, AF | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR | - |
| Single | 13 MP, 1/3.1", 1.12µm | 5 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Type | 6000 mAh, non-removable | 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gold, Black, Blue | Midnight Black, Quetzal Cyan, Cosmic Purple |
| Models | LB8, LB8a | X653C |
Tecno Pouvoir 3 Plus
- Octa-core processor offers better multitasking.
- Potentially smoother app performance.
- More responsive user experience.
- May have slightly shorter battery life under heavy load.
- Likely a slightly higher price point.
Infinix Smart 4c
- Lower price point.
- Potentially longer battery life with minimal usage.
- Sufficient for basic phone functions.
- Quad-core processor struggles with multitasking.
- Slower app loading times.
- Less responsive user experience.
Display Comparison
Neither Tecno nor Infinix provide detailed display specifications in the provided data. However, given their market segment, both likely utilize IPS LCD panels. The absence of information regarding resolution, brightness, or color gamut suggests a focus on cost reduction. The user experience will likely be similar, with neither device excelling in display quality. Expect standard viewing angles and color reproduction.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is difficult. Both devices likely feature basic camera setups geared towards casual photography. Given the price point, image quality will likely be adequate in good lighting conditions but suffer in low light. The absence of information regarding sensor size or aperture suggests neither device will excel in image quality. Any additional cameras (often 2MP macro or depth sensors) are unlikely to significantly enhance the overall photography experience.
Performance
The core difference between these devices is the chipset. The Tecno Pouvoir 3 Plus’s Mediatek Helio P22 (MT6762) boasts an octa-core CPU clocked at 2.0 GHz, utilizing Cortex-A53 cores. In contrast, the Infinix Smart 4c’s Helio A22 (MT6761) features a quad-core CPU, also clocked at 2.0 GHz using Cortex-A53 cores. While both are based on the same architecture, the doubling of cores in the P22 translates to significantly improved multitasking capabilities and smoother performance in demanding applications. The P22’s increased processing power will be particularly noticeable when switching between apps or browsing the web with multiple tabs open. Both chipsets are fabricated on a 12nm process, suggesting similar power efficiency, but the P22 will likely draw slightly more power under load due to its higher core count.
Battery Life
Battery capacity isn't specified, but both phones likely feature batteries in the 3000-4000 mAh range, typical for this price segment. Charging wattage is also unknown. Real-world battery life will depend heavily on usage patterns, but the Helio P22 in the Tecno Pouvoir 3 Plus may consume slightly more power due to its higher processing demands. However, the performance benefits likely outweigh the potential minor reduction in battery life for most users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Pouvoir 3 Plus if you need a phone capable of handling more than just the most basic apps, or if you anticipate multitasking between several applications. The extra cores will provide a smoother experience. Buy the Infinix Smart 4c if your primary needs are limited to calls, texts, and very light app usage, and you are prioritizing the absolute lowest possible price point. It’s a functional device for those with minimal smartphone requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Tecno Pouvoir 3 Plus handle popular social media apps like Facebook and WhatsApp smoothly?
Yes, the Helio P22 chipset in the Tecno Pouvoir 3 Plus is capable of running social media apps like Facebook and WhatsApp without significant lag. The octa-core processor provides enough processing power for these common tasks, offering a smoother experience than the quad-core Helio A22 in the Infinix Smart 4c.
❓ Is the Infinix Smart 4c suitable for playing mobile games?
The Infinix Smart 4c is not ideal for gaming. While it can run very basic games, the Helio A22 chipset and limited processing power will struggle with more demanding titles. Expect low frame rates and potential lag, even on low graphics settings. The Tecno Pouvoir 3 Plus offers a slightly better gaming experience, but neither phone is designed for serious mobile gaming.
❓ How much storage do these phones typically offer, and can it be expanded?
While not specified, both phones likely come with 32GB of internal storage, expandable via microSD card. This is standard for devices in this price range. Users planning to store many photos, videos, or apps should prioritize a model with microSD card support.
