Looking for a budget-friendly smartphone? The Tecno Pop 6 Pro and Samsung Galaxy A40 offer compelling options, but cater to different needs. This comparison dives deep into their features to help you choose the right device for your budget and lifestyle.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A40 is the clear winner, offering significantly better performance, a brighter display, and a more refined user experience despite its age. The Tecno Pop 6 Pro is a budget champion, but compromises on key areas.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat12 600/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, September 17 | 2019, March 19. Released 2019, April |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, September 28 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.9 x 76.3 x 8.8 mm (6.49 x 3.00 x 0.35 in) | 144.4 x 69.2 x 7.9 mm (5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 140 g (4.94 oz) |
| | Splash resistant | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~437 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~82.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.9 inches, 85.5 cm2 (~85.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 480 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (2x1.77 GHz Cortex-A73 & 6x1.59 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (12 nm) | Exynos 7904 (14 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G71 MP2 |
| OS | Android 12 (Go edition), HiOS 8.6 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 8 MP, f/2.0
Auxiliary lens | 16 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide) |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 5 MP | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | - |
| Single | 5 MP | 25 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.9µm |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| | - | ANT+ |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 15W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 3100 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Peaceful Blue, Polar Black | Black, White, Blue, Coral |
| Models | BE8 | SM-A405F, SM-A405FN, SM-A405FM, SM-A405S |
| Price | About 80 EUR | About 260 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 0.49 W/kg (head) 1.34 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -91.0dB / Crosstalk -85.9dB |
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 73h |
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: infinite |
| Loudspeaker | - |
Voice 66dB / Noise 68dB / Ring 73dB |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 106388 (v7)
GeekBench: 4112 (v4.4)
GFXBench: 4.6fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Tecno Pop 6 Pro
- Extremely affordable
- Decent battery life (estimated)
- Lightweight design
- Low performance
- Basic display
- Limited camera capabilities
- Outdated chipset
Samsung Galaxy A40
- Superior performance
- Vibrant Super AMOLED display
- Better camera quality
- Refined user experience
- Good battery life
- Older model (potential software update limitations)
- 15W charging is relatively slow
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A40 boasts a Super AMOLED display with a measured 548 nits brightness and an infinite contrast ratio, providing vibrant colors and deep blacks. The Pop 6 Pro likely has a standard LCD display, which will be less bright and have lower contrast. The A40's display is noticeably superior.
Camera Comparison
While both offer 'Photo/Video' capabilities, the Samsung Galaxy A40 generally has a more capable camera system due to better image processing and potentially better sensors. The Pop 6 Pro's camera is likely adequate for basic snapshots, but won't compete with the A40's image quality.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy A40's Exynos 7904 with its octa-core CPU (2x1.77 GHz Cortex-A73 & 6x1.59 GHz Cortex-A53) offers significantly better performance than the Pop 6 Pro's Helio A22 with its quad-core Cortex-A53. Expect smoother multitasking and faster app loading on the A40.
Battery Life
Both phones are reported to have excellent battery life, with the Galaxy A40 achieving an endurance rating of 73h. The Pop 6 Pro's battery capacity is likely smaller, but its less demanding processor might compensate somewhat. The A40 likely offers longer real-world usage.
Buying Guide
The Tecno Pop 6 Pro is ideal for users prioritizing affordability above all else and needing basic smartphone functionality. The Samsung Galaxy A40 is a better choice for those seeking a smoother experience, a better camera, and a brighter display, even if it's an older model.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Tecno Pop 6 Pro good for gaming?
No, the Pop 6 Pro's chipset is not powerful enough for demanding games. It can handle basic games, but expect low frame rates and potential lag.
❓ Will the Samsung Galaxy A40 receive software updates?
Samsung has likely ended major software updates for the Galaxy A40. However, it may still receive security patches for a limited time.
❓ Which phone has better call quality?
Generally, Samsung phones have a reputation for good call quality. However, both phones should provide acceptable call quality in most conditions.