The Tecno Pop 5 and itel Vision 2S represent the absolute bottom end of the smartphone market, targeting first-time buyers or those needing a basic, reliable device. While neither phone will set performance records, understanding their differences is crucial for maximizing value within a very tight budget. This comparison focuses on how the itel Vision 2S’s more modern chipset stacks up against the Tecno Pop 5’s simpler processor.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the itel Vision 2S is the better choice. Its Unisoc SC9863A chipset, featuring an octa-core CPU, provides a significantly more responsive experience than the Tecno Pop 5’s quad-core Cortex-A7. The 18W charging is also a substantial advantage, offsetting the likely similar battery capacities.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | - | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, July 26 | 2021 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, July 26 | Available. Released 2021 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 157.7 x 75.7 x 9.6 mm (6.21 x 2.98 x 0.38 in) | 166 x 76.3 x 8.9 mm (6.54 x 3.00 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM |
| Weight | - | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~282 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.1 inches, 91.3 cm2 (~76.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~81.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 | Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | - | Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm) |
| GPU | - | IMG8322 |
| OS | Android 10 (Go edition), HIOS | Android 11 (Go edition) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 16GB 1GB RAM, 32GB 2GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 5 MP
VGA | 8 MP
0.3 MP |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | 5 MP | - |
| Video | Unspecified | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | - |
| Single | 5 MP | 5 MP |
| Video | Unspecified | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Yes |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 18W wired |
| Type | 4000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Ice Lake Green, Obsidian Black, Ice Blue | Gradation Purple, Gradation Blue, Deep Blue |
| Models | BD2, BD2p, BD3, BD1, BD2d | - |
| Price | About 70 EUR | - |
Tecno Pop 5
- Potentially lower price point
- Extremely simple user interface
- Lightweight and compact
- Outdated processor
- Slow performance
- Likely slow charging
itel Vision 2S
- Octa-core processor for smoother performance
- 18W fast charging
- More responsive user experience
- May be slightly more expensive
- Unisoc chipset may have limited software support
- Camera quality likely similar to Tecno Pop 5
Display Comparison
Neither Tecno nor itel provide detailed display specifications. Given the price point, both likely utilize LCD panels with resolutions around 480x854. The absence of information suggests neither phone prioritizes display quality. Expect basic viewing angles and color reproduction. Bezels are likely to be substantial on both devices, maximizing screen real estate within a compact form factor.
Camera Comparison
Both phones likely feature basic camera setups. Without specific sensor details, it’s safe to assume both rely on low-resolution sensors (likely 5MP or 8MP main sensors). Image quality will be limited, particularly in low light. Any secondary cameras (depth or macro) are likely to be of very low quality and offer minimal benefit. The itel Vision 2S may have a slight edge if it utilizes software optimizations for image processing, but don't expect flagship-level results from either device.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipset. The Tecno Pop 5’s quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 processor is based on an older architecture. In contrast, the itel Vision 2S boasts the Unisoc SC9863A, an octa-core chip with a combination of 1.6 GHz and 1.2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The Cortex-A55 is a more efficient and capable architecture than the A7, meaning the itel will handle app switching and multitasking with noticeably less lag. The 28nm process node of the Unisoc chip is less efficient than modern nodes, but the core count advantage outweighs this in this price bracket. The itel will provide a smoother user experience for everyday tasks.
Battery Life
Battery capacity details are unavailable for both devices. However, given their target market and price point, they likely feature batteries in the 3000-4000 mAh range. The itel Vision 2S’s 18W wired charging is a significant advantage. While the Tecno Pop 5’s charging speed is unknown, it’s likely to be considerably slower. This means the itel can be topped up much faster, reducing downtime and increasing usability.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Pop 5 if your primary need is extreme simplicity and minimal cost, and you only intend to use it for basic calling and texting. Buy the itel Vision 2S if you want a phone capable of handling light multitasking, occasional social media browsing, and appreciate the convenience of faster charging. The itel is the better option for anyone wanting a slightly more modern smartphone experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the itel Vision 2S be able to run WhatsApp and Facebook smoothly?
Yes, the Unisoc SC9863A’s octa-core processor and Cortex-A55 cores are sufficient to run popular social media apps like WhatsApp and Facebook without significant lag. While it won’t offer a high-end experience, it will be usable for basic communication and browsing.
❓ Is the 18W charging on the itel Vision 2S compatible with any USB charger?
The itel Vision 2S likely uses a standard USB-C port. While an 18W PD (Power Delivery) charger is ideal, it will also charge with lower-wattage chargers (like 10W or 15W). However, charging will be slower with a less powerful adapter. Using a higher wattage charger than 18W will not damage the device, as it will only draw the power it needs.
❓ Can the Tecno Pop 5 handle video playback from YouTube?
The Tecno Pop 5 can play YouTube videos, but expect buffering and potential stuttering, especially with higher resolutions. The quad-core Cortex-A7 processor is not powerful enough for smooth playback of demanding video content. Lowering the video resolution to 360p or 480p will improve the experience.
