Xiaomi 13 Pro vs Tecno Phantom X2: A Detailed Comparison of Flagship Android Phones
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi 13 Pro emerges as the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 delivers demonstrably better performance and efficiency, complemented by a significantly brighter display and faster charging. While the Tecno Phantom X2 offers a compelling price-to-performance ratio, the Xiaomi 13 Pro’s overall refinement justifies the higher cost.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Tecno Phantom X2 | Xiaomi 13 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 07 | 2022, December 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, January 09 | Available. Released 2022, December 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), ceramic back or silicone polymer back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 164.6 x 72.7 x 8.9 mm (6.48 x 2.86 x 0.35 in) | 162.9 x 74.6 x 8.4 mm or 8.7 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 203 g (7.16 oz) | 210 g or 229 g (7.41 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~387 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~522 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 111.6 cm2 (~93.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.73 inches, 108.9 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 1900 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G710 MC10 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 12, HIOS 12 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 - 128GB UFS 4.0 - 256/512GB | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica lens, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, (wide), PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/1.3", 1.12µm, AF 2 MP | 50.3 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 75mm (telephoto), PDAF (10cm - ∞), 3.2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 115˚ (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps | 8K@24fps (HDR), 4K@24/30/60fps (HDR10+, 10-bit Dolby Vision HDR, 10-bit LOG), 1080p@30/120/240/960fps, 1080p@1920fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | FM radio, recording | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 54% in 20 min, 100% in 60 min | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 19 min 50W wireless, 100% in 36 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | 5160 mAh | Li-Po 4820 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Stardust Gray, Moonlight Silver | Ceramic White, Ceramic Black, Ceramic Flora Green, Mountain Blue |
| Models | AD8 | 2210132G, 2210132C |
| Price | About 460 EUR | About 750 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 110h | Endurance rating 115h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -26.8 LUFS (Good) | -25.6 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 973623 (v9) GeekBench: 4027 (v5.1) GFXBench: 71fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 1281666 (v9) GeekBench: 5087 (v5.1), 5323 (v6) GFXBench: 64fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Tecno Phantom X2
- More affordable price point
- Capable Dimensity 9000 chipset
- Respectable battery endurance (110h)
- Significantly lower display brightness
- Slower charging speeds (60 minutes to full)
- Less refined overall experience
Xiaomi 13 Pro
- Superior Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 performance
- Much brighter and more vibrant display
- Ultra-fast 120W wired and 50W wireless charging
- Higher price tag
- Potentially more expensive repairs
- May run hotter under extreme load (though thermal management is improved)
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 13 Pro’s display is a clear winner, boasting a measured peak brightness of 1253 nits compared to the Tecno Phantom X2’s 710 nits. This translates to significantly better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. Both devices feature an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting deep blacks, but the Xiaomi’s higher brightness provides a more vibrant and engaging viewing experience. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels, the Xiaomi 13 Pro’s superior brightness and potential for higher refresh rate support (not specified in the data, but typical for this class) give it a distinct advantage.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but the provided data lacks specifics. Given Xiaomi’s history with flagship camera systems, it’s reasonable to assume the 13 Pro features a more sophisticated camera setup, potentially with larger sensors and advanced image processing algorithms. The absence of sensor size information prevents a definitive comparison, but Xiaomi typically prioritizes camera quality in its Pro models. The Tecno Phantom X2 likely offers a capable camera experience, but it’s unlikely to match the Xiaomi 13 Pro’s potential for detail, dynamic range, and low-light performance.
Performance
The Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in the Xiaomi 13 Pro, with its Cortex-X3 prime core clocked at 3.2 GHz, offers a performance edge over the Tecno Phantom X2’s Mediatek Dimensity 9000. The Snapdragon’s architecture, featuring a more efficient 4nm process, also contributes to better thermal management, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during sustained workloads. The Xiaomi’s CPU configuration (1x3.2GHz Cortex-X3, 2x2.8GHz Cortex-A715, 2x2.8GHz Cortex-A710, 3x2.0GHz Cortex-A510) is optimized for both peak performance and power efficiency, while the Dimensity 9000 (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) relies on older core designs. This difference will be most noticeable in demanding games and applications.
Battery Life
While the Tecno Phantom X2 boasts an endurance rating of 110 hours and the Xiaomi 13 Pro 115 hours, the real-world impact differs significantly due to charging speeds. The Xiaomi 13 Pro’s 120W wired charging can fully charge the device in just 19 minutes, a massive advantage over the Tecno’s 60-minute charge time. Furthermore, the Xiaomi 13 Pro offers 50W wireless charging and 10W reverse wireless charging, features absent on the Tecno Phantom X2. The Xiaomi’s active use score of 10:55h suggests efficient power management despite the higher performance, effectively offsetting the slightly smaller battery (implied, as mAh is not provided).
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Phantom X2 if you prioritize value and are comfortable with a slightly less polished experience. It’s ideal for users who want a powerful phone for everyday tasks and light gaming without breaking the bank. Buy the Xiaomi 13 Pro if you demand top-tier performance, a stunning display, and the fastest possible charging speeds, and are willing to pay a premium for it. This phone caters to power users, mobile photographers, and gamers.