Tecno Phantom X2 vs vivo X90 Pro+: Which Flagship Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the vivo X90 Pro+ emerges as the superior choice. While the Tecno Phantom X2 offers excellent value, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s superior processing power, coupled with its faster 80W charging and potential for more efficient thermal management, justifies the price premium. However, the Phantom X2 remains a strong contender for budget-conscious buyers prioritizing battery endurance.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Tecno Phantom X2 | vivo X90 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 07 | 2022, November 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, January 09 | Available. Released 2022, December 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame, plastic back | Glass front, aluminum frame, eco leather back |
| Dimensions | 164.6 x 72.7 x 8.9 mm (6.48 x 2.86 x 0.35 in) | 164.4 x 75.3 x 9.7 mm (6.47 x 2.96 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 203 g (7.16 oz) | 221 g (7.80 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~387 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~517 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 111.6 cm2 (~93.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.4 cm2 (~90.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz | LTPO4 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G710 MC10 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 12, HIOS 12 | Android 13, Funtouch (Global), Origin OS 3 (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 4.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50.3 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, Dual Pixel PDAF, Laser AF, OIS 64 MP, f/3.5, 90mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/1.6, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.4", 0.7µm, AF, 2x optical zoom, OIS 48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, AF |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, (wide), PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/1.3", 1.12µm, AF 2 MP | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, 14-bit RAW video |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 32-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio, recording | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 54% in 20 min, 100% in 60 min | 80W wired, 100% in 33 min (advertised) 50W wireless Reverse wired |
| Type | 5160 mAh | Li-Po 4700 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Stardust Gray, Moonlight Silver | Black, Red |
| Models | AD8 | V2227A |
| Price | About 460 EUR | About 1030 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 110h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -26.8 LUFS (Good) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 973623 (v9) GeekBench: 4027 (v5.1) GFXBench: 71fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Tecno Phantom X2
- Excellent battery endurance (110h rating)
- More affordable price point
- Capable Dimensity 9000 chipset
- Slower charging speeds (45W)
- Less powerful chipset compared to Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- Limited camera details
vivo X90 Pro+
- Superior performance with Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- Ultra-fast 80W wired and 50W wireless charging
- Potentially exceptional camera system
- Higher price tag
- Potentially lower battery endurance compared to Tecno
- May run warmer under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Tecno Phantom X2 boasts a display capable of reaching 710 nits of peak brightness, which is respectable but falls short of the expected levels for a flagship in well-lit environments. While the 'Infinite' contrast ratio is a marketing term, it suggests a good OLED panel. The vivo X90 Pro+, while lacking specific brightness data, is expected to exceed this figure given its positioning and the typical performance of flagship vivo displays. Both likely utilize AMOLED technology, but the X90 Pro+ may benefit from LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, potentially improving power efficiency. Bezels and color accuracy are unknown for both, but the X90 Pro+ is likely to have a slight edge in overall display quality due to its higher-end components.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specs are limited for the Tecno Phantom X2, but it's described as having both photo and video capabilities. The vivo X90 Pro+ is expected to feature a more sophisticated camera system, potentially including a large 1-inch sensor (based on previous vivo Pro+ models). The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is also more advanced, enabling superior image processing, noise reduction, and dynamic range. While the Phantom X2 may offer acceptable image quality, the X90 Pro+ is likely to excel in low-light photography and video recording, offering greater detail and clarity. The absence of specific sensor details for the Phantom X2 makes a direct comparison difficult, but the X90 Pro+ is positioned as a camera-centric flagship.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo X90 Pro+’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) utilizes a more advanced architecture – specifically the Cortex-X3 prime core clocked at 3.2 GHz – compared to the Tecno Phantom X2’s Dimensity 9000 (4nm) and its Cortex-X2 core at 3.05 GHz. This translates to a noticeable performance advantage for the Snapdragon in CPU-intensive tasks and gaming. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 also benefits from architectural improvements in the Cortex-A715 and A710 cores, offering better efficiency. While both phones utilize 4nm fabrication, the Snapdragon’s design is optimized for sustained performance and reduced thermal throttling. The X90 Pro+’s LPDDR5x RAM further enhances memory bandwidth, contributing to a smoother overall experience.
Battery Life
The Tecno Phantom X2 boasts an endurance rating of 110 hours, suggesting excellent battery life. However, this is a lab-based metric and real-world usage will vary. It supports 45W wired charging, reaching 54% in 20 minutes and 100% in 60 minutes. The vivo X90 Pro+ significantly ups the ante with 80W wired charging, advertised to reach 100% in just 33 minutes. Furthermore, it adds 50W wireless charging and reverse wired charging, offering greater versatility. While the Phantom X2’s battery life is commendable, the X90 Pro+’s faster charging speeds and wireless capabilities provide a more convenient and efficient charging experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Phantom X2 if you prioritize long battery life and a more affordable entry point into the flagship space. It’s ideal for users who consume a lot of media and don’t necessarily need the absolute fastest performance. Buy the vivo X90 Pro+ if you demand the best possible performance for gaming and demanding applications, value significantly faster charging speeds (including wireless), and are willing to invest in a more premium camera system.