Tecno Phantom X2 vs vivo V27: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo V27 edges out the Tecno Phantom X2 thanks to its significantly brighter display, longer battery life, and slightly faster charging. While the Phantom X2 boasts a more powerful chipset, the V27's overall package provides a more polished and user-friendly experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Tecno Phantom X2 | vivo V27 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 78 SA/NSA - Asia | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 07 | 2023, March 01 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, January 09 | Available. Released 2023, March 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame, plastic back | Glass front, glass back |
| Dimensions | 164.6 x 72.7 x 8.9 mm (6.48 x 2.86 x 0.35 in) | 164.1 x 74.8 x 7.4 mm (6.46 x 2.94 x 0.29 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 203 g (7.16 oz) | 180 g (6.35 oz) |
| - | Color changing back panel color | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~387 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 111.6 cm2 (~93.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7200 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G710 MC10 | Mali-G610 MC4 |
| OS | Android 12, HIOS 12 | Android 13, Funtouch 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, (wide), PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/1.3", 1.12µm, AF 2 MP | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash | Dual-LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio, recording | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 54% in 20 min, 100% in 60 min | 66W wired, 50% in 19 min |
| Type | 5160 mAh | 4600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Stardust Gray, Moonlight Silver | Magic Blue, Noble Black, Emerald Green, Flowing Gold |
| Models | AD8 | V2231, V2246 |
| Price | About 460 EUR | About 380 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 110h | Endurance rating 134h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -26.8 LUFS (Good) | -28.2 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 973623 (v9) GeekBench: 4027 (v5.1) GFXBench: 71fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 613641 (v9) GeekBench: 2400 (v5.1), 2689 (v6) GFXBench: 34fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Tecno Phantom X2
- More powerful chipset (Dimensity 9000)
- Faster charging (45W)
- Potentially better image processing
- Lower display brightness
- Shorter battery life
- Design may be less premium
vivo V27
- Brighter display (1055 nits)
- Longer battery life (134h endurance)
- Stylish design
- Good selfie camera
- Less powerful chipset (Dimensity 7200)
- Slightly slower charging (66W)
Display Comparison
The vivo V27 takes a clear lead in the display department. Its measured peak brightness of 1055 nits is substantially higher than the Phantom X2's 710 nits, resulting in better outdoor visibility and a more immersive viewing experience. Both offer infinite contrast ratios, but the V27's brightness advantage is undeniable. Both likely use AMOLED panels with vibrant colors.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but detailed comparisons require more in-depth testing. The Phantom X2 likely offers more flexibility with its chipset's image processing capabilities. The vivo V27 is known for its selfie camera and potentially better color science in its main camera. Both likely offer a variety of shooting modes and resolutions.
Performance
The Tecno Phantom X2 holds the advantage here, thanks to its Mediatek Dimensity 9000 chipset. This is a significantly more powerful processor than the vivo V27's Dimensity 7200. Expect smoother performance in demanding games and applications on the Phantom X2. However, the V27's Dimensity 7200 is still capable and efficient for everyday tasks.
Battery Life
The vivo V27 dominates in battery life, boasting an endurance rating of 134 hours compared to the Phantom X2's 110 hours. This translates to significantly longer usage between charges. The V27 also has slightly faster charging speeds at 66W versus the Phantom X2's 45W.
Buying Guide
The Tecno Phantom X2 is ideal for users prioritizing raw processing power for gaming or demanding applications. The vivo V27 is a better choice for those who value a vibrant display, exceptional battery life, and a stylish design, making it perfect for everyday use and content creation.