Tecno Phantom X2 vs Samsung Galaxy A54: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A54 edges out the Tecno Phantom X2 thanks to its brighter display, more refined software experience, and faster software updates. While the Phantom X2 boasts a powerful chipset and faster charging, the A54's overall polish and brand reputation give it the slight advantage.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Tecno Phantom X2 | Samsung Galaxy A54 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 07 | 2023, March 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, January 09 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.6 x 72.7 x 8.9 mm (6.48 x 2.86 x 0.35 in) | 158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2 mm (6.23 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 203 g (7.16 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~387 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 111.6 cm2 (~93.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G710 MC10 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| OS | Android 12, HIOS 12 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, (wide), PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/1.3", 1.12µm, AF 2 MP | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.X", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio, recording | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 54% in 20 min, 100% in 60 min | 25W wired |
| Type | 5160 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Stardust Gray, Moonlight Silver | Lime, Graphite, Violet, White |
| Models | AD8 | SM-A546V, SM-A546U, SM-A546U1, SM-A546B, SM-A546B/DS, SM-A546E, SM-A546E/DS, SM-A5460, SM-A546M, SM-A546M/DS, SM-A546W |
| Price | About 460 EUR | € 210.00 / $ 119.11 / £ 169.95 / ₹ 28,999 |
| SAR | - | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.69 W/kg (head) 1.34 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 110h | Endurance rating 119h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -26.8 LUFS (Good) | -26.6 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 973623 (v9) GeekBench: 4027 (v5.1) GFXBench: 71fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 506678 (v9) GeekBench: 2703 (v5.1), 2797 (v6) GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Tecno Phantom X2
- Powerful Dimensity 9000 chipset
- Faster 45W charging
- Competitive price
- Less refined camera
- Software updates may be slower
- Lower display brightness
Samsung Galaxy A54
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- Excellent camera performance
- Reliable software and updates
- Water and dust resistance (IP67)
- Slower 25W charging
- Less powerful chipset than Phantom X2
- Higher price than Phantom X2
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A54 takes the display crown with a measured peak brightness of 980 nits, significantly brighter than the Phantom X2's 710 nits. Both offer infinite contrast ratios (nominally), but the A54's higher brightness makes it more usable outdoors. Color accuracy is generally good on both, but Samsung's display often has a slight edge in vibrancy.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but the Galaxy A54 generally produces more consistent and pleasing results. Samsung's image processing is more refined, resulting in better dynamic range and color accuracy. The Phantom X2's camera can sometimes struggle with over-saturation. Video recording is also generally better on the A54.
Performance
The Tecno Phantom X2 packs a punch with its Mediatek Dimensity 9000 chipset, a flagship-level processor. This translates to noticeably faster performance in demanding games and applications compared to the Exynos 1380 in the Galaxy A54. However, Samsung's One UI is well-optimized, so everyday tasks feel smooth on both devices.
Battery Life
The endurance ratings are very close, with the Galaxy A54 boasting a slightly higher endurance rating of 119h versus the Phantom X2's 110h. In active use, the A54 achieves 11:15h of battery life. The Phantom X2's 45W charging is significantly faster than the A54's 25W, allowing for quicker top-ups.
Buying Guide
The Tecno Phantom X2 is ideal for users prioritizing raw performance and fast charging, especially gamers or those who frequently multitask. The Samsung Galaxy A54 is a better choice for those seeking a reliable, well-supported device with a vibrant display and a strong camera, particularly those invested in the Samsung ecosystem.